Neurological Sciences

, Volume 35, Issue 8, pp 1243–1247 | Cite as

Effects of electromagnetic fields on Reelin and Dab1 expression in the developing cerebral cortex

  • Matin Hemmati
  • Farhad MashayekhiEmail author
  • Fareheh Firouzi
  • Masoumeh Ashori
  • Hamidreza Mashayekhi
Original Article


Many studies describe the biological effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) including brain damages, neuronal migration and neurogenesis within the central nervous system. Neuronal cell produced in the neuroepithelium migrates along radial glial fibers into the cortical plate. Reelin, which is produced by Cajal–Retzius cells directs neuronal migration. It was shown that Disabled 1 (Dab1) functions downstream of reelin signal transduction pathway that directs the correct cytoarchitecture of the developing cortex. In this study, the EMF effects on total protein concentration (TPC), reelin and Dab1 expression in the developing cortex was studied. 30 pregnant Balb/c mice were separated into three groups: control (n = 10), EMF (n = 10) and SHAM groups (n = 10). The 15-day pregnant mice were placed inside the solenoid for a daily EMF exposure of 5 h for 3 consecutive days (15–17). The SHAM group was also located in the same coil with no exposure. Mice were sacrificed 24 h after the final exposure session. TPC, reelin and Dab1 expression were studied by Bio-Rad protein assay and western blot. No significant change in the TPC was seen in the EMF-treated cerebral cortex samples compared with those from the SHAM and control groups. It was also shown that the reelin and Dab1 expression increases in the EMF-treated cerebral cortex extracts as compared to controls and SHAM group. It is concluded that EMF may play important role in the neural cell migration by increasing reelin and Dab1 expression in the developing cortex.


Electromagnetic fields Reelin Dab1 Cerebral cortex Development 



This study was supported by the University of Guilan. The authors thank all people in the Genetics and Developmental Biology laboratories, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Guilan, for their technical assistance.


  1. 1.
    Bar I, Lambert de Rouvroit C, Goffinet AM (2000) The evolution of cortical development. An hypothesis based on the role of the reelin signaling pathway. Trends Neurosci 23:633–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Uylings HB, Delalle I (1997) Morphology of neuropeptide Y-immunoreactive neurons and fibers in human prefrontal cortex during prenatal and postnatal development. J Comp Neurol 379:523–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Isaacs KR, Wolpoe ME, Jacobowitz DM (2000) Vulnerability to calcium-induced neurotoxicity in cultured neurons expressing calretinin. Exp Neurol 163:311–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hellwig S, Hack I, Zucker B, Brunne B, Junghans D (2012) Reelin together with ApoER2 regulates interneuron migration in the olfactory bulb. PLoS One 7:e50646PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bar I, Goffinet AM (1999) Developmental neurobiology. Decoding the reelin signal. Nature 399:645–646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Howell BW, Lanier LM, Frank R, Gertler FB, Cooper JA (1999) The disabled 1 phosphotyrosine-binding domain binds to the internalization signals of transmembrane glycoproteins and to phospholipids. Mol Cell Biol 19:5179–5188PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fatemi SH (2005) Reelin glycoprotein in autism and schizophrenia. Int Rev Neurobiol 71:179–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Botella-López A, Burgaya F, Gavín R (2006) Reelin expression and glycosylation patterns are altered in Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:5573–5578PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rice DS, Curran T (2001) Role of the reelin signaling pathway in central nervous system development. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:1005–1039PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Honda T, Kobayashi K, Mikoshiba K, Nakajima K (2011) Regulation of cortical neuron migration by the reelin signaling pathway. Neurochem Res 36:1270–1279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mashayekhi F, Gholizadeh L (2011) Administration of hepatocyte growth factor increases reelin and disabled 1 expression in the mouse cerebral cortex: an in vivo study. Cell Mol Neurobiol 31:1267–1270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yao L, Pandit A, Yao S, McCaig CD (2011) Electric field-guided neuron migration: a novel approach in neurogenesis. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 17:143–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dupont MJ, McKay BE, Parker G, Persinger MA (2004) Geophysical variables and behavior: xcix. Reductions in numbers of neurons within the parasolitary nucleus in rats exposed perinatally to a magnetic pattern designed to imitate geomagnetic continuous pulsations: implications for sudden infant death. Percept Mot Skills 98:958–966PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wertheimer N, Leeper E (1979) Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer. Am J Epidemiol 109:273–284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bernabò N, Tettamanti E, Russo V et al (2010) Extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure affects fertilization outcome in swine animal model. Theriogenology 73:1293–1305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ohgaki H (2009) Epidemiology of brain tumors. Methods Mol Biol 472:323–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maes A, Verschaeve L (2012) Can cytogenetics explain the possible association between exposure to extreme low-frequency magnetic fields and Alzheimer’s disease? J Appl Toxicol 32:81–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Robert E (1996) Teratogen update: electromagnetic fields. Teratology 54:305–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rajaei F, Borhani N, Sabbagh-Ziarani F, Mashayekhi F (2010) Effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field on fertility and heights of epithelial cells in pre-implantation stage endometrium and fallopian tube in mice. Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao 8:56–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang HH, Wang SR (2008) The effects of inverter magnetic fields on early seed germination of mung beans. Bioelectromagnetics 29:649–657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Solecki DJ (2012) Sticky situations: recent advances in control of cell adhesion during neuronal migration. Curr Opin Neurobiol 22:791–798PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Supèr H, Soriano E, Uylings HB (1998) The functions of the preplate in development and evolution of the neocortex and hippocampus. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 27:40–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sekine K, Honda T, Kawauchi T, Kubo K, Nakajima K (2011) The outermost region of the developing cortical plate is crucial for both the switch of the radial migration mode and the Dab1-dependent “inside-out” lamination in the neocortex. J Neurosci 31:9426–9439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chai X, Förster E, Zhao S, Bock HH, Frotscher M (2009) Reelin stabilizes the actin cytoskeleton of neuronal processes by inducing n-cofilin phosphorylation at serine3. J Neurosci 29:288–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matin Hemmati
    • 1
  • Farhad Mashayekhi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fareheh Firouzi
    • 1
  • Masoumeh Ashori
    • 1
  • Hamidreza Mashayekhi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of GuilanRashtIran
  2. 2.Department of Physics, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of GuilanRashtIran

Personalised recommendations