Advertisement

Neurological Sciences

, Volume 33, Supplement 1, pp 119–125 | Cite as

The therapeutic future in headache

  • Alan M. RapoportEmail author
THE FUTURE OF THERAPY IN HEADACHE

Abstract

There are many categories and individual types of headache and most have a variety of treatment protocols, while a few are best treated by just one medication. This paper will concentrate on acute care medications for migraine and discuss some new and future acute care treatments. There is not much to discuss about prevention, except that onabotulinumtoxinA has been approved for prevention of chronic migraine. Cluster headache will also be discussed, as there are some future treatments for acute care and prevention being studied at present. For the acute care of migraine in the US, we have seven triptans by tablet plus other routes and one non steroidal anti-inflammatory medication approved by the FDA that is currently available (Cambia brand of buffered diclofenac potassium for oral solution). There are several other acute care medications in various stages of development and there are three new methods of administering a triptan and others under investigation. The optimal acute care therapy for migraine should be faster, easier to use and more efficient with fewer adverse events than what is currently available. What follows is a brief review of the status in development for five of the many new acute care medications being investigated: the CGRP antagonist tablet telcagepant, the sumatriptan iontophoretic patch Zelrix, sumatriptan powder for use in the OptiNose apparatus, dihydroergotamine for oral inhalation (Levadex), civamide nasal solution for prevention of episodic cluster headache (Civanex) and sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for acute cluster attacks in chronic cluster headaches. Other future treatments that will not be discussed include transcranial magnetic stimulation, a 5-HT1F agonist named alniditan, large conductance calcium-activated potassium channel openers, glial modulators or other medications and devices in early stages of development.

Keywords

Headache treatment Migraine treatment Triptans Dihydroergotamine Migraine pipeline Cluster headache prevention 

Notes

Conflict of interest

A. Rapoport is on the Advisory Boards of NuPathe and MAP, he consults for Autonoic Technologies, Inc and Winston and is an author of the Phase IIB study on telcagepant studied by Merck.

References

  1. 1.
    Ramadan NM, Buchanan TM (2006) New and future migraine therapy. Pharmacol Ther 112:199–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goadsby PJ, Edvinsson L (1993) The trigeminovascular system and migraine: studies characterizing cerebrovascular and neuro- peptide changes seen in humans and cats. Ann Neurol 33:48–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Levy D, Burstein R, Strassman AM (2005) Calcitonin gene related peptide does not excite or sensitize meningeal nociceptors: implications for the pathophysiology of migraine. Ann Neurol 58:698–705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Olesen J, Diener HC, Husstedt IW et al (2004) Calcitonin gene related peptide receptor antagonist BIBN 4096 BS for the acute treatment of migraine. N Engl J Med 350:1104–1110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ho TW, Mannix LK, Fan X et al (2008) Randomized controlled trial of an oral CGRP receptor antagonist, MK-0974, in acute treatment of migraine. Neurology 70:1304–1312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ho TW, Ferrari MD, Dodick DW et al (2008) Efficacy and tolerability of MK-0974 (telcagepant), a new oral antagonist of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, compared with zolmi- triptan for acute migraine: a randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-treatment trial. Lancet 372:2089–2090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pierce M, Marbury T, O’Neill C et al (2008) A novel patch formulation of sumatriptan succinate utilizing SmartReliefTM transdermal technology. In: Data presented at the 50th annual scientific meeting of the American Headache Society, 28 June 2008Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Acute Anti-Migraine Efficacy and Tolerability of Zelrix, a Novel Iontophoretic Transdermal Patch of Sumatriptan. Paper presented at the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) 62nd Annual Meeting, April 2010Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rapoport AM, Freitag F, Pearlman S (2010) Innovative delivery systems for migraine: the clinical utility of a transdermal patch for the acute treatment of migraine. CNS Drugs 24(11):929–940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Armer T, Shrewsbury S, Newman S et al (2007) Aerosol delivery of ergotamine tartrate via a breath-synchronized plume-control inhaler in humans. Curr Med Res Opin 23:3177–3187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shrewsbury S, Cook R, Taylor G et al (2008) Safety and pharmacokinetics of dihydroergotamine mesylate administered via a novel (TEMPO) inhaler. Headache 48:355–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Silberstein SD, Kori SH, Aurora S et al (2010) LEVADEX, a novel orally inhaled treatment for acute migraine: Efficacy and tolerability results of a phase 3 study. In: 14th Congress of the International Headache Society; 2009 September 10–13, 2009; Philadelphia, PA, 2009Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luthringer R, Djupesland PG, Sheldrake CD et al (2009) Rapid absorption of sumatriptan powder and effects on the glyceryl trinitrate model of headache following intranasal delivery using a novel bi-directional device. J Pharm Pharmacol 61:1–10. doi: 10.1211ISSN0022-3573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Djupesland PG, Docˇekal P, the Czech Migraine Investigators Group (2010) Intranasal sumatriptan powder delivered by a novel breath-actuated bi-directional device for the acute treatment of migraine: a randomised, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia 30(8):933–942 (Cephalalgia online first, published on March 17, 2010 as doi: 10.1177/0333102409359314 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saper J, Klapper J, Mathew N et al (2002) Intransal civamide for the treatment of episodic cluster headaches. Arch Neurol 59:990–994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ansarinia M, Rezai A, Tepper S et al (2010) Electrical stimulation of sphenopalatine ganglion for acute treatment of cluster headaches. Headache 50:1164–1174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rapoport A (2011) New frontiers in headache therapy. Neurol Sci 32:105–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLALos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations