Animal Cognition

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 113–121 | Cite as

Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs

  • Á. Miklösi
  • R. Polgárdi
  • J. Topál
  • V. Csányi
Original article

Abstract

Since the observations of O. Pfungst the use of human-provided cues by animals has been well-known in the behavioural sciences (“Clever Hans effect”). It has recently been shown that rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) are unable to use the direction of gazing by the experimenter as a cue for finding food, although after some training they learned to respond to pointing by hand. Direction of gaze is used by chimpanzees, however. Dogs (Canis familiaris) are believed to be sensitive to human gestural communication but their ability has never been formally tested. In three experiments we examined whether dogs can respond to cues given by humans. We found that dogs are able to utilize pointing, bowing, nodding, head-turning and glancing gestures of humans as cues for finding hidden food. Dogs were also able to generalize from one person (owner) to another familiar person (experimenter) in using the same gestures as cues. Baseline trials were run to test the possibility that odour cues alone could be responsible for the dogs’ performance. During training individual performance showed limited variability, probably because some dogs already “knew” some of the cues from their earlier experiences with humans. We suggest that the phenomenon of dogs responding to cues given by humans is better analysed as a case of interspecific communication than in terms of discrimination learning.

Key words Dogs Inter-specific communication Visual cues Attention Human gestures 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson JR, Sallaberry P, Barbier H (1995) Use of experimenter-given cues during object choice tasks by capuchin monkeys. Anim Behav 49: 201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson JR, Montant M, Schmitt D (1996) Rhesus monkeys fail to use gaze direction as an experimenter-given cue in an object-choice task. Behav Proc 37: 47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrew RJ (1962) The origin and evolution of the calls and facial expressions of the primates. Behaviour 20: 1–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barker SB, Barker RT (1988) The human-canine bond: closer than family ties? J Mental Health Counsel 10: 46–56Google Scholar
  5. Blaschke M, Ettlinger G (1987) Pointing as an act of social communication by monkeys}. Anim Behav 35: 1520–1523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolwig N (1964) Facial expression in primates with remarks on a parallel development in a certain carnivores. Behaviour 22: 167–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butterworth G Jarrett N 1991 What minds have in common is spaces patial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy. Br J Dev Psychol 955-7Google Scholar
  8. Candland DK (1993) Feral children and clever animals. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Cox RP (1993) The human/animal bond as a correlate of family functioning. Clin Nursing Res 2: 224–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Emery NJ, Lorincz EN, Perrett DI, Oram MW, Baker CI (1997) Gaze following and joint attention in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). J Comp Psychol 111: 286–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fox MW (1970) A comparative study of development of facial expressions in canids, wolf, coyote and foxes. Behaviour 36: 49–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frank H (1980) Evolution of canine information processing under conditions of natural and artificial selection. Z Tierpsychol 59: 389–399Google Scholar
  13. Freedman DG, King JA, Elliot O (1961) Critical periods in the social development of dogs. Science 133: 1016–1017PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ginsburg BE (1976) Evolution of communication patterns in animals.: In: Hahn ME, Simmel EC (eds) Communicative behaviour and evolution. Academic Press, New York, pp 59–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gomez JC (1996) Ostensive behaviour in great apes: the role of eye contact. In: Russon AE, Parker ST, Bard K (eds) Reaching into thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 131–151Google Scholar
  16. Harlow HF (1951) Primate learning. In: Stone TP (ed) Comparative psychology. Prentice-Hall, New York, pp 183–238Google Scholar
  17. Hooff JARAM van (1962) Facial expressions in higher primates. Symp Zool Soc Lond 8: 97–125Google Scholar
  18. Itakura S (1996) An exploratory study of gaze-monitoring in nonhuman primates. Jpn Psychol Res 38: 174–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Itakura S, Anderson JR (1996) Learning to use experimenter-given cues during an object-choice task by a capuchin monkey. Curr Psychol Cogn 15: 103–112Google Scholar
  20. Itakura S, Tanaka M (1998) Use of experimenter-given cues during object choice tasks by chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), and orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) and human infants (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 112: 119–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jenkins WO (1943) A spatial factor in chimpanzee learning. J Comp Psychol 35: 81–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kretchmer KR, Fox MW (1975) Effects of domestication on animal behaviour. Vet Rec 96: 102–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leung EHL, Rheingold HL (1981) Development of pointing as a social gesture. Dev Psychol 17: 215–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maestripieri D (1996) Gestural communication and its cognitive implication in pigtail macaques (Macaca nemestrina). Behaviour 133: 997–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McConell PB, Baylis JR (1985) Interspecific communication in cooperative herding: acoustic and visual signals from shepherds and herding dogs. Z Tierpsychol 67: 302–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mech LD (1970) The wolf: the ecology and behaviour of an endangered species. Natural History, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Menzel EW (1973) Leadership and communication in young chimpanzees. In: Menzel EW (ed) Precultural primate behaviour. Karger, Basel, pp 192–125Google Scholar
  28. Messent P, Serpell J (1981) An historical and biological view of the pet owner bond. In: Fogle B (ed) Interrelations between people and pets. Thomas, Springfield, pp 5–22Google Scholar
  29. Miller RE, Murphy JV (1964) Influence of the spatial relationships between the cue, reward, and response in discrimination learning. J Exp Psychol 67: 120–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Murphy JV, Miller RE (1955) The effect of spatial contiguity of cue and reward in the object-quality learning of rhesus monkeys. J Comp Physiol Psychol 48: 221–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Niebuhr BR, Levinson M, Nobbe DE, Tiller JE (1980) Treatment of an incompletely socialized dog. In: Hart BL (ed) Canine behaviour. Veterinary Practice, Santa Barbara, pp 83–85Google Scholar
  32. Pepperberg IM, McLaughlin MA (1996) Effect of avian-human joint attention on allospecific vocal learning by grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus). J Comp Psychol 110: 286–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pfungst O (1911) Clever Hans. The horse of Mr. von Osten. Henry Holt, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Povinelli DJ, Eddy TJ (1996) Chimpanzees: joint visual attention. Psychol Sci 7: 129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Povinelli, DJ, Eddy TJ (in press) Factors influencing young chimpanzees’ (Pan troglodytes) recognition of attention. J Comp PsycholGoogle Scholar
  36. Povinelli, DJ, Eddy TJ (1997) Specificity of gaze-following in young chimpanzees. Br J Dev Psychol 15: 213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Povinelli DJ, Nelson KE, Boysen ST (1990) Inferences about guessing and knowing by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 104: 203–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Povinelli DJ, Parks KA, Novak MA (1991) Do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) attribute knowledge and ignorance to others? J Comp Psychol 105: 318–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Redican WK (1975) Facial expressions in nonhuman primates. In: Rosenblum LA (ed) Primate behaviour: developments in field and laboratory research, vol 4. Academic Press, New York, pp 103–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sackett GP, Porter M, Holmes H (1965) Choice behaviour in rhesus monkeys: effect of stimulation during the first month of life. Science 147: 304–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schenkel R (1947) Ausdrucksstudien an Wülfen. Behaviour 1: 81–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scott JP (1992) The phenomenon of attachment in human-nonhuman relationships. In: Davis H, Balfour D (eds) The inevitable bond. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 72–92Google Scholar
  43. Scott JP, Fuller JL (1965) Genetics and the social behaviour of the dog. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  44. Serpell J (1995) The domestic dog. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Sigg H, Stolba A (1981) Home range and daily march in a hamadryas baboon troop. Folia Primatol 36: 40–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Topál J, Miklósi A, Dóka A, Csányi V (1998) Attachment behaviour in dogs: a new application of the Ainsworth's strange situation test. J Comp Psychol 112: 218–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vilá C, Savolainen P, Maldonado JE, Amorim IR, Rice JE, Homeycutt RL, Crandall KA, Lundeberg J, Wayne RK (1997) Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. Science 276: 1687–1689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weigel RM (1979) The facial expressions of the brown capuchin monkey (Cebus apella). Behaviour 68: 250–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Á. Miklösi
    • 1
  • R. Polgárdi
    • 1
  • J. Topál
    • 1
  • V. Csányi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EthologyEötvös UniversityGödHungary

Personalised recommendations