Advertisement

Animal Cognition

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 1185–1190 | Cite as

User innovation: a novel framework for studying animal innovation within a comparative context

  • Lydia M. HopperEmail author
  • Andrew W. Torrance
Short Communication

Abstract

Much work has been dedicated to defining and describing animal innovation. Despite this, efforts to compare human and animal innovation have been hindered by perceived fundamental differences between how, and why, humans and animals innovate. Furthermore, there is not a useful framework for comparisons across different taxa. Here, we provide an overview of the current understanding of human ‘user’ innovation, provide some examples of user innovation, and highlight the parallels between animal innovation and user innovation by humans. User innovation, put simply, is the process by which people invent to satisfy their own needs, not necessarily with the aim of distributing their invention, or marketing it for profit. Thus, it is much more closely aligned to the manner in which nonhuman animals innovate. Our intention is that this discussion will help to re-frame how we consider animal innovation and foster more direct comparisons between human and animal innovation, while propagating new avenues for research, both experimental and observational.

Keywords

User innovation Free innovation Problem solving Play Social learning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The ideas we present here arose from discussions at meetings hosted by the Gruter Institute for Law and Behavioral Economics and we thank the organizers of those meetings, namely Monika Gruter Cheney and Oliver Goodenough, for hosting and for providing us with a forum to present these ideas.

Funding

At the time of writing, Lydia M Hopper was supported by the Women’s Board of Lincoln Park Zoo. No other grants or funding supported the work associated with the writing of this article.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Lydia M Hopper declares that she has no conflict of interest. Andrew W Torrance declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Auersperg AMI, Szabo B, von Bayern AMP, Kacelnik A (2012) Spontaneous innovation in tool manufacture and use in a Goffin’s cockatoo. Curr Biol 22(21):R903–R904PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin CY, von Hippel E (2010) Modeling a paradigm shift: from producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper, No. 10-038; MIT Sloan Research Paper, No. 4764-09. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1502864. Accessed 25 May 2019
  3. Becker JA (1994) ‘Sneak-shoes’, ‘sworders’ and ‘nose-beards’: a case study of lexical innovation. First Lang 14(41):195–211Google Scholar
  4. Behncke I (2015) Play in the Peter Pan ape. Curr Biol 25(1):R24–R27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brosnan SF, Hopper LM (2014) Psychological limits on animal innovation. Anim Behav 92:325–332Google Scholar
  6. Burghardt GM (2005) The genesis of animal play: testing the limits. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler S (2014) The story of the sandwich. https://www.history.com/news/the-story-of-the-sandwich. Accessed 31 July 2019]
  8. Byrne RW (2015) The what as well as the why of animal fun. Curr Biol 25(1):R2–R4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Carr K, Kendal RL, Flynn EG (2015) Imitate or innovate? Children’s innovation is influenced by the efficacy of observed behaviour. Cognition 142:322–332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng K, Byrne RW (2018) Why human environments enhance animal capacities to use objects: evidence from keas (Nestor notabilis) and apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pan paniscus, Pongo abelii, Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 132(4):419–426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cutting N, Apperly IA, Chappell J, Beck SR (2014) The puzzling difficulty of tool innovation: why can’t children piece their knowledge together? J Exp Child Pscyhol 125:110–117Google Scholar
  12. Davids M, Frenken K (2017) Proximity, knowledge base and the innovation process: towards an integrated framework. Region Stud 52(1):23–34Google Scholar
  13. Dean LG, Vale GL, Laland KN, Flynn E, Kendal RL (2014) Human cumulative culture: a comparative perspective. Biol Rev 89(2):284–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. DeMonaco HJ, Olivier P, Torrance AW, von Hippel C, von Hippel EA (2019) When patients become innovators MIT Sloan Management Review. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3355803. Accessed 25 May 2019
  15. Ebel SJ, Hanus D, Call J (2019) How prior experience and task presentation modulate innovation in 6-year-old-children. J Exp Child Psychol 180:87–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2015) Do birds have the capacity for fun? Curr Biol 25(1):R16–R20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Forss SIF, Schuppli C, Haiden D, Zweifel N, van Schaik CP (2015) Contrasting responses to novelty by wild and captive orangutans. Am J Primatol 77(10):1109–1121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Forss SIF, Koski SE, van Schaik CP (2017) Explaining the paradox of neophobic explorers: the social information hypothesis. J Primatol 38(5):799–822Google Scholar
  19. Franke N, Shah S (2003) How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Res Pol 32(1):157–178Google Scholar
  20. Griffin AS (2016) Innovativeness as an emergent property: a new alignment of comparative and experimental research on animal innovation. Phil Tran R Soc B 371(1690):20150544Google Scholar
  21. Haidle MN, Bräuer J (2011) From brainwave to tradition—how to detect innovations in tool behavior. Paelo Anthropol.  https://doi.org/10.4207/PA.2011.ART48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hirata S, Watanabe K, Masao K (2008) “Sweet-potato washing” revisited. In: Matsuzawa T (ed) Primate origins of human cognition and behavior. Springer, Tokyo, pp 487–508Google Scholar
  23. Hobaiter C, Poisot T, Zuberbühler K, Hoppitt W, Gruber T (2014) Social network analysis shows direct evidence for social transmission of tool use in wild chimpanzees. PLoS Biol 12(9):e1001960PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Hopkins WD, Taglialatela JP, Leavens DA (2007) Chimpanzees differentially produce novel vocalizations to capture the attention of a human. Anim Behav 73:281–286PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoppitt W, Laland KN (2013) Social learning: an introduction to mechanisms, methods, and models. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoppitt WJE, Brown GR, Kendal R, Rendell L, Thornton A, Webster MW, Laland KN (2008) Lessons from animal teaching. Trends Ecol Evol 23(9):486–493PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hunt GR, Gray RD (2003) Diversification and cumulative evolution in New Caledonian crow tool manufacture. Proc R Soc B 270(1517):867–874PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hyysalo S (2009) User innovation and everyday practices: micro-innovation in sports industry development. R&D Manag 39(3):247–258Google Scholar
  29. Isaacson W (2014) The innovators: how a group of hackers, geniuses, and geeks created the digital revolution. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaufman AB, Kaufman JC (2015) Animal creativity and innovation. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Kendal RL, Coe RL, Laland KN (2005) Age differences in neophilia, exploration, and innovation in family groups of Callitrichid monkeys. Am J Primatol 66:167–188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Krause J, Ruxton GD, Krause S (2010) Swarm intelligence in animals and humans. Trends Ecol Evol 25(1):28–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kummer H, Goodall J (1985) Conditions of innovative behaviour in primates. Phil Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 308:203–214Google Scholar
  34. Laidre ME (2008) Do captive mandrills invent new gestures? Anim Cogn 11(2):179–187PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Laughlin PR, Hatch EC, Silver JS, Boh L (2006) Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: effects of group size. J Personal Soc Psychol 90(4):644–651Google Scholar
  36. Leca JB, Gunst N, Watanabe K, Huffman MA (2007) A new case of fish-eating in Japanese macaques: implications for social constraints on the diffusion of feeding innovation. Am J Primatol 69(7):821–828PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Matsuzawa T, Yamakoshi G (1996) Comparison of chimpanzee material culture between Bossou and Nimba, West Africa. In: Rousson AE, Bard K, Parker S (eds) Reaching into thought: the minds of the great Apes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 211–232Google Scholar
  38. Matsuzawa T, Biro D, Humle T, Inoue-Nakamura N, Tonooka R, Yamakoshi G (2001) Emergence of culture in wild chimpanzees: education by master-apprenticeship. In: Matsuzwa T (ed) Primate origins of human cognition and behavior. Springer, Tokyo, pp 557–574Google Scholar
  39. Mesoudi A (2011) Variable cultural acquisition costs constrain cumulative cultural evolution. PLoS One 6(3):e18239PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Mesoudi A, Thornton A (2018) What is cumulative cultural evolution? Proc R Soc B 285:20180712PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mesoudi A, Laland KN, Boyd R, Buchanan B, Flynn E, McCauley RN, Jürgen R, Reyes-García V, Shennan S, Dietrich S, Tennie C (2013) The cultural evolution of technology and science. In: Richerson PJ, Christiansen M (eds) Cultural evolution: society, technology, language, and religion. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 193–216Google Scholar
  42. Musgrave S, Morgan D, Lonsdorf E, Mundry R, Sanz C (2016) Tool transfers are a form of teaching among chimpanzees. Sci Rep 6:34783PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Muthukrishna M, Henrich J (2016) Innovation in the collective brain. Phil Trans R Soc B.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0192 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Nishida T, Matsuzaka McGrew WC (2009) Emergence, propagation or disappearance of novel behavioral patterns in the habituated chimpanzees of Mahale: a review. Primates 50(1):23–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. O’Mahony S (2003) Guarding the commons: how open source contributors protect their work. Res Policy 32(7):1179–1198Google Scholar
  46. Patterson EM, Mann J (2011) The ecological conditions that favor tool use and innovation in wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.). PLoS One 6(7):e22243PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Prasher S, Thompson MJ, Evans JC, El-Nachef M, Bonier F, Morand-Ferron J (2019) Innovative consumers: ecological, behavioral, and physiological predictors of responses to novel food. Behav Ecol.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arz067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ramsey G, Bastian ML, van Schaik C (2007) Animal innovation defined and operationalized. Behav Brain Sci 30:393–437PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Reader SM, Laland KN (2001) Primate innovation: sex, age and social rank differences. Int J Primatol 22(5):787–805Google Scholar
  50. Reader SM, Laland KN (2003) Animal innovation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  51. Reader SM, Morand-Ferron J, Flynn E (2016) Animal and human innovation: novel problem and novel solutions. Phil Trans R Soc B 371(1690):20150182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Reindl E, Apperly IA, Beck SR, Tennie C (2017) Young children copy cumulative technological design in the absence of action information. Sci Rep 7:1788PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Rogers EM (2005) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Sanz C, Call J, Morgan D (2009) Design complexity in termite-fishing tools of chimpanzees (Pan trogolodytes). Biol Lett 5(3):293–296PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Sasaki T, Biro D (2017) Cumulative culture can emerge from collective intelligence in animal groups. Nat Commun 8:15049PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper & Brothers, New York (ISBN 978-1617208652) Google Scholar
  57. Smith A (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. W Strahan and T Cadell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  58. St Clair JJH, Klump BC, Sugasawa S, Higgott CG, Colegrave N, Rutz C (2018) Hook innovation boosts foraging efficiency in tool-using crows. Nat Ecol Evol 2:441–444PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Tebbich S, Griffin AS, Peschl MF, Sterelny K (2016) From mechanisms to function: an integrated framework of animal innovation. Phil Trans R Soc B 371:20150195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Tennie C, Call J, Tomasello M (2009) Ratcheting up the ratchet: on the evolution of cumulative culture. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:2405–2415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Thornton A, Samson J (2012) Innovative problem solving in wild meerkats. Anim Behav 83(6):1459–1468Google Scholar
  62. van de Waal E, Bshary R (2010) Contact with human facilities appears to enhance technical skills in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops). Folia Primatol 81:282–291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. van Schaik CP, Burkart J, Damerius L, Forss SIF, Koops K, van Noordwijk MA, Schuppli C (2016) The reluctant innovator: orangutans and the phylogeny of creativity. Phil Trans R Soc B 371:20150183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. von Hippel E (1988) The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press: New York. http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www-old/books/sources/Sofl.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2019
  65. von Hippel E (2005) Democratizing Innovation The MIT Press: Cambridge. http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm. Accessed 29 May 2016
  66. von Hippel E (2017) Free Innovation The MIT Press:  Cambridge. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2866571. Accessed 07 May 2019
  67. Whiten A, Goodall J, McGrew WC, Nishida T, Reynolds V, Sugiyama Y, Tutin CEG, Wrangham RW, Boesch C (1999) Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature 399:682–685PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lester E. Fisher Center for the Study and Conservation of Apes, Lincoln Park ZooChicagoUSA
  2. 2.The University of Kansas School of LawUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  3. 3.MIT Sloan School of ManagementCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations