Advertisement

Cats match voice and face: cross-modal representation of humans in cats (Felis catus)

  • Saho TakagiEmail author
  • Minori Arahori
  • Hitomi Chijiiwa
  • Atsuko Saito
  • Hika Kuroshima
  • Kazuo Fujita
Short Communication

Abstract

We examined whether cats have a cross-modal representation of humans, using a cross-modal expectancy violation paradigm originally used with dogs by Adachi et al. (Anim Cogn 10:17–21, 2007). We compared cats living in houses and in cat cafés to assess the potential effect of postnatal experience. Cats were presented with the face of either their owner or a stranger on a laptop monitor after playing back the voice of one of two people calling the subject’s name. In half of the trials the voice and face were of the same person (congruent condition) whereas in the other half of trials the stimuli did not match (incongruent condition). The café cats paid attention to the monitor longer in incongruent than congruent conditions, showing an expectancy violation. By contrast, house cats showed no similar tendency. These results show that at least café cats can predict their owner’s face upon hearing the owner’s voice, suggesting possession of cross-modal representation of at least one human. There may be a minimal kind or amount of postnatal experiences that lead to formation of a cross-modal representation of a specific person.

Keywords

Cross-modal representation Cats Felis catus Expectancy violation method 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) No. 17J08974 to S. Takagi, No. JP16J1034 to M. Arahori, No. JP16J08691 to H. Chijiiwa, No. 25118003 to A. Saito and Nos. 25240020, 26119514, 16H01505, 15K12047, 25118002, and 16H06301 to K. Fujita from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). The authors acknowledge with thanks to all owners and cats who volunteered in this study. The authors also wish to thank Dr. James R. Anderson for editing the article.

Compliance with ethical standards

This study adhered to the ethical guidelines of Kyoto University, and was approved by the Animal Experiment Committee of the Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Adachi I, Fujita K (2007) Cross-modal representation of human caretakers in squirrel monkeys. Behav Proc 74:27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adachi I, Hampton RR (2011) Rhesus monkeys see who they hear: spontaneous cross-modal memory for familiar conspecifics. PLoS One 6:e23345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adachi I, Kuwahata H, Fujita K (2007) Dogs recall their owner’s face upon hearing the owner’s voice. Anim Cogn 10:17–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Audacity Team (2018) Audacity(R): Free Audio Editor and Recorder [Computer application]. Version 2.3.0 retrieved Dec 20th 2018 from https://audacityteam.org/
  5. Bahrick LE, Hernandez-Reif M, Flom R (2005) The development of infant learning about specific face-voice relations. Dev Psychol 41:541–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bovet D, Deputte BL (2009) Matching vocalizations to faces of familiar conspecifics in grey-cheeked mangabeys (Lophocebus albigena). Folia Primatol 80:220–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradshaw JW (2016) Sociality in cats: a comparative review. J Vet Behav: Clin Appl Res 11:113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campanella S, Belin P (2007) Integrating face and voice in person perception. Trends Cognit Sci 11:535–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collard RR (1967) Fear of strangers and play behavior in kittens with varied social experience. Child Dev 38:877–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahl CD, Rasch MJ, Tomonaga M, Adachi I (2013) Developmental processes in face perception. Sci Rep 3:1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellis SLH, Thompson H, Guijarro C, Zulch HE (2015) The influence of body region, handler familiarity and order of region handled on the domestic cat’s response to being stroked. Appl Anim Behav Sci 173:60–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fox J, Weisberg S, Adler D, Bates D, Baud-Bovy G, Ellison S, Heiberger R (2012) Package ‘car’. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  14. Galvan M, Vonk J (2016) Man’s other best friend: domestic cats (F. silvestris catus) and their discrimination of human emotion cues. Anim Cogn 19:193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilfillan G, Vitale J, McNutt JW, McComb K (2016) Cross-modal individual recognition in wild African lions. Biol Let 12:20160323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gorman ML, Trowbridge BJ (1989) The role of odor in the social lives of carnivores. Carnivore behavior, ecology, and evolution. Springer, Boston, pp 57–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ito Y, Watanabe A, Takagi S, Arahori M, Saito A (2016) Cats beg for food from the human who looks at and calls to them: ability to understand humans’ attentional states. Psychologia 59:112–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kojima S, Izumi A, Ceugniet M (2003) Identification of vocalizers by pant hoots, pant grunts and screams in a chimpanzee. Primates 44:225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kondo N, Izawa EI, Watanabe S (2012) Crows cross-modally recognize group members but not non-group members. Proc R Soc Lond B: Biol Sci 279:1937–1942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2017) lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw 82Google Scholar
  21. Merola I, Lazzaroni M, Marshall-Pescini S, Prato-Previde E (2015) Social referencing and cat–human communication. Anim Cogn 18:639–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miklósi Á, Pongrácz P, Lakatos G, Topál J, Csányi V (2005) A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans and cats (Felis catus) and humans. J Comp Psychol 119:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pitcher BJ, Briefer EF, Baciadonna L, McElligott AG (2017) Cross-modal recognition of familiar conspecifics in goats. R Soc Open Sci 4:160346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pongrácz P, Szapu JS, Faragó T (2018) Cats (Felis silvestris catus) read human gaze for referential information. Intelligence (in press)Google Scholar
  25. Proops L, McComb K (2012) Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus) extends to familiar humans. Proc R Soc Lond B: Biol Sci rspb20120626Google Scholar
  26. Proops L, McComb K, Reby D (2009) Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:947–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/
  28. Saito A, Shinozuka K (2013) Vocal recognition of owners by domestic cats (Felis catus). Anim Cogn 16:685–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saito A, Shinozuka K, Ito Y, Hasegawa T (2019) Domestic cats (Felis catus) discriminate their names from other words. Sci Rep (in press)Google Scholar
  30. Sliwa J, Duhamel JR, Pascalis O, Wirth S (2011) Spontaneous voice–face identity matching by rhesus monkeys for familiar conspecifics and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:1735–1740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Takagi S, Arahori M, Chijiiwa H, Tsuzuki M, Hataji Y, Fujita K (2016) There’s no ball without noise: cats’ prediction of an object from noise. Anim Cogn 19:1043–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Takaoka A, Morisaki A, Fujita K (2013) [in Japanese with English abstract] Cross-modal concept of human gender in dogs (Canis familiaris). Jpn J Anim Psychol 63:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Taylor AM, Reby D, McComb K (2011) Cross modal perception of body size in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). PLoS One 6:e17069CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saho Takagi
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Minori Arahori
    • 1
    • 3
  • Hitomi Chijiiwa
    • 1
    • 3
  • Atsuko Saito
    • 2
  • Hika Kuroshima
    • 1
  • Kazuo Fujita
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Graduate School of LettersKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, Faculty of Human SciencesSophia UniversityTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Japan Society for the Promotion of ScienceTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations