Stereotypic horses (Equus caballus) are not cognitively impaired
Stereotypies in animals are thought to arise from an interaction between genetic predisposition and sub-optimal housing conditions. In domestic horses, a well-studied stereotypy is crib-biting, an abnormal behaviour that appears to help individuals to cope with stressful situations. One prominent hypothesis states that animals affected by stereotypies are cognitively less flexible compared to healthy controls, due to sensitization of a specific brain area, the basal ganglia. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis in crib-biting and healthy controls, using a cognitive task, reversal learning, which has been used as a diagnostic for basal ganglia dysfunction. The procedure consisted of exposing subjects to four learning tasks; first and second acquisition, and their reversals. For each task, we measured the number of trials to reach criterion and heart rate and heart-rate variability. Importantly, we did not try to prevent crib-biters from executing their stereotypic behaviour. We found that the first reversal learning task required the largest number of trials, confirming its challenging nature. Interestingly, the second reversal learning task required significantly fewer trials to reach criterion, suggesting generalisation learning. However, we did not find any performance differences across groups; both stereotypic and control animals required a similar numbers of trials and did not differ in their physiological responses. Our results thus challenge the widely held belief that crib-biting horses, and stereotypic animals more generally, are cognitively impaired. We conclude that cognitive underperformance may occur in stereotypic horses if they are prevented from crib-biting to cope with experienced stress.
KeywordsCrib-biting Basal ganglia Learning capacity
We are grateful to all the owners of the horses who offered to participate in this study. We are also grateful to Matthew Parker, who gave us the idea to perform this study and helped us with the design of the experiment.
Compliance with ethical standards
The experimental procedure for the horses was approved by the Federal Veterinary Office (approval number VD 26777 bis; Switzerland).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
- Boyer P, Lienard P (2006) Why ritualized behavior? Precaution Systems and action parsing in developmental, pathological and cultural rituals. Behav Brain Sci 29:595–613; (discussion 613–550)Google Scholar
- Briefer Freymond S, Bardou D, Briefer EF, Bruckmaier R, Fouché N, Fleury J, Maigrot AL, Ramseyer A, Zuberbühler K, Bachmann I (2015) The physiological consequences of crib-biting in horses in response to an ACTH challenge test. Physiol Behav 151:121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.07.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Houpt KAM, McDonnell SM (1993) Equine stereotypies. Compend Contin Educ 15:1265–1271Google Scholar
- Izquierdo A, Brigman JL, Radke AK, Rudebeck PH, Holmes A (2017) The neural basis of reversal learning: An updated perspective. Neuroscience 345:12–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.03.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Luescher UA, McKeown DB, Halip J (1991) A cross-sectional study on compulsive behavior (stable vices) in horses. Equine Vet J 27:14–18Google Scholar
- Mason G, Latham N (2004) Can’t stop, won’t stop: is stereotypy a reliable animal welfare indicator? Anim Welf 13:57–69Google Scholar
- McGreevy P, McLean A (2010) Equitation science. Wiley, Hoboken, p 328Google Scholar
- Sappington BKF, McCall CA, Coleman DA, Kuhlers DL, Lishak RS (1997) A preliminary study of the relationship between discrimination reversal learning and performance tasks in yearling and 2-year-old horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 53:157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01157-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Voith VL (1975) Pattern discrimination, learning set formation, memory retention, spatial and visual reversal learning by the horse. The Ohio State University, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
- von Borell E et al (2007) Heart rate variability as a measure of autonomic regulation of cardiac activity for assessing stress and welfare in farm animals: a review. In: Paper presented at the physiology & behavior, stress and welfare in farm animals, 10/22/2007Google Scholar