Advertisement

Animal Cognition

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 467–480 | Cite as

Relative salience of syllable structure and syllable order in zebra finch song

  • Shelby L. Lawson
  • Adam R. Fishbein
  • Nora H. Prior
  • Gregory F. Ball
  • Robert J. Dooling
Original Paper

Abstract

There is a rich history of behavioral and neurobiological research focused on the ‘syntax’ of birdsong as a model for human language and complex auditory perception. Zebra finches are one of the most widely studied songbird species in this area of investigation. As they produce song syllables in a fixed sequence, it is reasonable to assume that adult zebra finches are also sensitive to the order of syllables within their song; however, results from electrophysiological and behavioral studies provide somewhat mixed evidence on exactly how sensitive zebra finches are to syllable order as compared, say, to syllable structure. Here, we investigate how well adult zebra finches can discriminate changes in syllable order relative to changes in syllable structure in their natural song motifs. In addition, we identify a possible role for experience in enhancing sensitivity to syllable order. We found that both male and female adult zebra finches are surprisingly poor at discriminating changes to the order of syllables within their species-specific song motifs, but are extraordinarily good at discriminating changes to syllable structure (i.e., reversals) in specific syllables. Direct experience or familiarity with a song, either using the bird’s own song (BOS) or the song of a flock mate as the test stimulus, improved both male and female zebra finches’ sensitivity to syllable order. However, even with experience, birds remained much more sensitive to structural changes in syllables. These results help to clarify some of the ambiguities from the literature on the discriminability of changes in syllable order in zebra finches, provide potential insight on the ethological significance of zebra finch song features, and suggest new avenues of investigation in using zebra finches as animal models for sequential sound processing.

Keywords

Auditory perception Hearing Song motif Syllable sequence Syllable structure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Jane Brown for help with data analysis and figure preparation, Edward Smith for technical expertise, and Bill Idsardi, Juan Uriagereka, and David Vicario for comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by a T32 training grant to N.H.P and A.F. (NIDCD T-32 DC00046), and a National Science Foundation award (under Grant No. 1449815) to A.F.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethics approval

This work was conducted in accordance with Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour (ASAB) guidelines and was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) (R-15-09), University of Maryland, College Park.

Supplementary material

10071_2018_1182_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (298 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 8572 KB)

References

  1. Arnold AP (1975) The effects of castration on song development in zebra finches (Poephila guttata). J Exp Zool 191:261–278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball GF, Hulse SH (1998) Birdsong. Am Psychol 53:37–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baran NM, Peck SC, Kim TH, Goldstein MH, Adkins-Regan E (2017) Early life manipulations of vasopressin-family peptides alter vocal learning. Proc R Soc B 284:1859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beckers GJL, Berwick RC, Okanoya K, Bolhuis JL (2017) What do animals learn in artificial grammar studies? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews In Press, Corrected ProofGoogle Scholar
  5. Beecher MD (2017) Birdsong learning as a social process. Anim Behav 124:233–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berwick RC, Okanoya K, Beckers GJ, Bolhuis JJ (2011) Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong. Trends Cognit Sci 15:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolhuis JJ, Eda-Fujiwara H (2003) Bird brains and songs: neural mechanisms of birdsong perception and memory. Animal Biology 53:129–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolhuis JJ, Eda-Fujiwara H (2010) Birdsong and the brain: the syntax of memory. Neuroreport 21:395–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolhuis JJ, Gahr M (2006) Neural mechanisms of birdsong memory. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:347–357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Braaten RF, Petzoldt M, Colbath A (2006) Song perception during the sensitive period of song learning in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). J Comp Psychol 120:79–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Brainard MS, Doupe AJ (2013) Songbirds as a model for basic and applied medical research. Annu Rev Neurosci 36:489–517CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (2008) Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge University Press, Second EditionCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen J, van Rossum D, ten Cate C (2015) Artificial grammar learning in zebra finches and human adults: XYX versus XXY. Anim Cogn 18:151–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen Y, Matheson LE, Sakata JT (2016) Mechanisms underlying the social enhancement of vocal learning in songbirds. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:6641–6646Google Scholar
  15. Coleman MJ, Mooney R (2004) Synaptic transformations underlying highly selective auditory representations of learned birdsong. J Neurosci 24:7251–7265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Danish HH, Aronov D, Fee MS (2017) Rhythmic syllable-related activity in a songbird motor thalamic nucleus necessary for learned vocalizations. PLoS One 12:e0169568CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Dooling RJ, Okanoya K (1995) The method of constant stimuli in testing auditory sensitivity in small birds. In: Klump GM, Dooling RJ, Fay RR, Stebbins WC (eds) Methods in comparative psychoacoustics. Birkha¨user–Verlag, Basel, pp 161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dooling RJ, Prior NH (2017) Do we hear what birds hear in birdsong? Anim Behav 124:283–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dooling RJ, Leek MR, Gleich O, Dent ML (2002) Auditory temporal resolution in birds: discrimination of harmonic complexes. J Acoust Soc Am 112:748–759CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Doupe AJ (1997) Song-and order-selective neurons in the songbird anterior forebrain and their emergence during vocal development. J Neurosci 17:1147–1167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Doupe AJ, Konishi M (1991) Song-selective auditory circuits in the vocal control system of the zebra finch. Proc Natl Acad Sci 88:11339–11343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Doupe AJ, Kuhl PK (1999) Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. Annu Rev Neurosci 22:567–631CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fee MS, Scharff C (2010) The songbird as a model for the generation and learning of complex sequential behaviors. ILAR J 51:362–377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Goldstein MH, King AP, West MJ (2003) Social interaction shapes babbling: testing parallels between birdsong and speech. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:8030–8035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gourevitch V, Galanter EA (1967) A significance test for one parameter isosensitivity functions. Psychometrika 32:25–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Griffith SC, Buchanan KL (2010) The zebra finch: the ultimate Australian supermodel. Emu 110:5–12Google Scholar
  27. Hauber ME, Woolley SM, Cassey P, Theunissen FE (2013) Experience dependence of neural responses to different classes of male songs in the primary auditory forebrain of female songbirds. Behav Brain Res 243:184–190CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Holveck MJ, Riebel K (2014) Female zebra finches learn to prefer more than one song and from more than one tutor. Anim Behav 88:125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ikeda MZ, Jeon SD, Cowell RA, Remage-Healey L (2015) Norepinephrine modulates coding of complex vocalizations in the songbird auditory cortex independent of local neuroestrogen synthesis. J Neurosci 35:9356–9368CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Immelmann K (1969) Song development in the zebra finch and other estrildid finches In: Hinde RA (ed) Bird vocalizations, Cambridge University Press pp 61–74Google Scholar
  31. Janata P, Margoliash D (1999) Gradual emergence of song selectivity in sensorimotor structures of the male zebra finch song system. J Neurosci 19:5108–5118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kazanina N, Phillips C, Idsardi W (2006) The influence of meaning on the perception of speech sounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:11381–11386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kazanina N, Bowers JS, Idsardi W (2017) Phonemes: Lexical access and beyond. Psychonomic Bull Rev.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1362-0 [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 28875456Google Scholar
  34. Klump GM, Dooling RJ, Fay R, Stebbins WC (eds) (1995) Methods in comparative psychoacoustics. BirkhäuserGoogle Scholar
  35. Konishi M (1985) Birdsong: from behavior to neuron. Annu Rev Neurosci 8:125–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kriengwatana B, Spierings MJ, ten Cate C (2016) Auditory discrimination learning in zebra finches: effects of sex, early life conditions and stimulus characteristics. Anim Behav 116:99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuhl PK (2010) Brain mechanisms in early language acquisition. Neuron 67:713–727CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Lewicki MS (1996) Intracellular characterization of song-specific neurons in the zebra finch auditory forebrain. J Neurosci 16:5854–5863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lipkind D, Zai AT, Hanuschkin A, Marcus GF, Tchernichovski O, Hahnloser RHR (2017) Songbirds work around computational complexity by learning song vocabulary independently of sequence. Nat Commun 8:1247CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Lohr B, Dooling RJ, Bartone S (2006) The discrimination of temporal fine structure in call-like harmonic sounds by birds. J Comp Psychol 120:239–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lu K, Vicario DS (2014) Statistical learning of recurring sound patterns encodes auditory objects in songbird forebrain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:14553–14558CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. MacDougall-Shackleton SA (2009) The importance of development: what songbirds can teach us. Can J Exp Psychol 63:74–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Macmillan NA, Creelman CD (2005) Detection theory: a user’s guide, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  44. Margoliash D (1983) Acoustic parameters underlying the responses of song-specific neurons in the white-crowned sparrow. J Neurosci 3:1039–1057CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Menyhart O, Kolodny O, Goldstein MH, DeVoogd TJ, Edelman S (2015) Juvenile zebra finches learn the underlying structural regularities of their fathers’ song. Front Psychol 6:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Miller-Sims VC, Bottjer SW (2014) Development of neural responsivity to vocal sounds in higher level auditory cortex of songbirds. J Neurophysiol 112:81–94CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Miyawaki K, Strange W, Verbrugge R, Liberman AM, Jenkins JJ, Fujimora O (1975) An effect of linguistic experience: the discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Percept Pychophys 18:331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moore BC (2014) Auditory processing of temporal fine structure: Effects of age and hearing loss. World Scientific, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mouterde SC, Elie JE, Mathevon N, Theunissen FE (2017) Single neurons in the avian auditory cortex encode individual identity and propagation distance in naturally degraded communication calls. J Neurosci 37:3491–3510CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Okanoya K, Tsumaki S, Honda E (2000) Perception of temporal properties in self-generated songs by Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata var domestica). J Comp Psychol 114:239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Peh WY, Roberts TF, Mooney R (2015) Imaging auditory representations of song and syllables in populations of sensorimotor neurons essential to vocal communication. J Neurosci 35:5589–5605CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Pfenning AR, Hara E, Whitney O, Rivas MV, Wang R, Roulhac PL (2014) Convergent transcriptional specializations in the brain of humans and song-learning birds. Science 346:1256846CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Prior NH, Smith E, Lawson S, Ball GF, Dooling RJ (2018) Acoustic fine structure may encode biologically relevant information for zebra finches. Sci Rep 8(1).  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24307-0
  54. Simpson HB, Vicario DS (1990) Brain pathways for learned and unlearned vocalizations differ in zebra finches. J Neurosci 10:1541–1556CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Spierings MJ, ten Cate C (2016) Budgerigars and zebra finches differ in how they generalize in an artificial grammar learning experiment. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:E3977–E3984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sturdy CB, Phillmore LS, Weisman RG (2000) Note types, harmonic structure, and note order in the songs of zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). J Comp Psychol 113:194–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. ten Cate C, Okanoya K (2012) Revisiting the syntactic abilities of non-human animals: natural vocalizations and artificial grammar learning. Philos Trans R Soc B 367:1984–1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tu H-W, Dooling RJ (2012) Perception of warble song in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): evidence for special processing. Anim Cogn 15:1151–1159CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Tu H-W, Dooling RJ (2017) Sequential analysis of budgerigar (Melopsittcus undulates) warble Presented at the 4th International Symposium on Animal Bioacoustics, Omaha, NEGoogle Scholar
  60. Vallentin D, Long MA (2015) Motor origin of precise synaptic inputs onto forebrain neurons driving a skilled behavior. J Neurosci 35:299–307CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. van Heijningen CAA, de Visser J, Zuidema W, ten Cate C (2009) Simple rules can explain discrimination of putative recursive syntactic structures by a songbird species. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:20538–20543Google Scholar
  62. van Heijningen CAA, Chen J, van Laatum I, van der Hulst B, ten Cate C (2013) Rule learning by zebra finches in an artificial grammar learning task: which rule? Anim Cognit 16:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vernaleo BA, Dooling RJ (2011) Relative salience of envelope and fine structure cues in zebra finch song. J Acoust Soc Am 129:3373–3383CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Vicario DS, Yohay KH (1993) Song-selective auditory input to a forebrain vocal control nucleus in the zebra finch. Dev Biol 24:488–505Google Scholar
  65. Williams H (2001) Choreography of song, dance and beak movements in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). J Exp Biol 204:3497–3506PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Williams H, Cynx J, Nottebohm F (1989) Timbre control in zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) song syllables. J Comp Psychol 103:366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Zann RA (1996) The zebra finch: a synthesis of field and laboratory studies. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Neuroscience and Cognitive Science ProgramUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUnited States

Personalised recommendations