Can dogs use vocal intonation as a social referencing cue in an object choice task?
Evidence from the literature indicates that dogs’ choices can be influenced by human-delivered social cues, such as pointing, and pointing combined with facial expression, intonation (i.e., rising and falling voice pitch), and/or words. The present study used an object choice task to investigate whether intonation conveys unique information in the absence of other salient cues. We removed facial expression cues and speech information by delivering cues with the experimenter’s back to the dog and by using nonword vocalizations. During each trial, the dog was presented with pairs of the following three vocal cues: Positive (happy-sounding), Negative (sad-sounding), and Breath (neutral control). In Experiment 1, where dogs received only these vocal cue pairings, dogs preferred the Positive intonation, and there was no difference in choice behavior between Negative or Breath. In Experiment 2, we included a point cue with one of the two vocal cues in each pairing. Here, dogs preferred containers receiving pointing cues as well as Negative intonation, and preference was greatest when both of these cues were presented together. Taken together, these findings indicate that dogs can indeed extract information from vocal intonation alone, and may use intonation as a social referencing cue. However, the effect of intonation on behavior appears to be strongly influenced by the presence of pointing, which is known to be a highly salient visual cue for dogs. It is possible that in the presence of a point cue, intonation may shift from informative to instructive.
KeywordsDogs Canis familiaris Social referencing Object choice task Intonation Pointing
Supplementary material 2 (MP4 8151 kb)
- Bjelland JA (2010) Imagine life with a well-behaved dog: a 3-step positive dog-training program. St. Martin’s Griffin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Campos JJ, Stenberg C (1981) Perception, appraisal, and emotion: the onset of social referencing. In: Lamb ME, Sherrod LR (eds) Infant social cognition: empirical and theoretical considerations. Erlbaum, New Jersey, pp 273–314Google Scholar
- Campos JJ, Mumme DL, Kermoian R, Campos RG (1994) A functionalist perspective on the nature of emotion. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 59:284–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.1994.tb01289.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heyes CM, Galef BG (1996) Social learning in animals: the roots of culture. Academic Press, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- Kendon A (1980) Gesticulation and speech: two aspects of the process of utterance. In: Key MR (ed) The relationship of verbal and non-verbal communication. Mouton, The Hague, pp 207–227Google Scholar
- Simonet PR, Murphy M, Lance A (2001) Laughing dog: Vocalizations of domestic dogs during play encounters. Paper presented at the meeting of the Animal Behavior Society, Corvallis, ORGoogle Scholar
- Udell MAR, Hall NJ, Morrison J, Dorey NR, Wynne CDL (2013) Point topography and within-session learning are important predictors of pet dogs’ (Canis lupus familiaris) performance on human guided tasks. Rev Argent Cienc Comport 5:3–20Google Scholar