Animal Cognition

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 999–1002 | Cite as

Do ‘literate’ pigeons (Columba livia) show mirror-word generalization?

Short Communication

Abstract

Many children pass through a mirror stage in reading, where they write individual letters or digits in mirror and find it difficult to correctly utilize letters that are mirror images of one another (e.g., b and d). This phenomenon is thought to reflect the fact that the brain does not naturally discriminate left from right. Indeed, it has been argued that reading acquisition involves the inhibition of this default process. In the current study, we tested the ability of literate pigeons, which had learned to discriminate between 30 and 62 words from 7832 nonwords, to discriminate between words and their mirror counterparts. Subjects were sensitive to the left–right orientation of the individual letters, but not the order of letters within a word. This finding may reflect the fact that, in the absence of human-unique top-down processes, the inhibition of mirror generalization may be limited.

Keywords

Mirror generalization Reading Pigeon Vision Comparative cognition 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by University of Otago Department of Psychology research funds to M.C.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This research was approved by the University of Otago Animal Ethics Committee.

References

  1. Ahr E, Houdé O, Borst G (2016) Inhibition of the mirror generalization process in reading in school-aged children. J Exp Child Psychol 145:157–165. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.12.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Beale I, Williams R, Webster D, Corballis MC (1972) Confusion of mirror images by pigeons and interhemispheric commissures. Nature 238:348–349. doi: 10.1038/238348a0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cavoto KK, Cook RG (2001) Cognitive precedence for local information in hierarchical stimulus processing by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 27:3–16. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.27.1.3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Corballis MC, Beale I (1970) Bilateral symmetry and behavior. Psychol Rev 77:451–464. doi: 10.1037/h0029805 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cornell JM (1985) Spontaneous mirror-writing in children. Can J Exp Psychol 39:174–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dehaene S (2009) Reading in the brain: the new science of how we read. Viking Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Dehaene S, Cohen L, Sigman M, Vinckier F (2005) The neural code for written words: a proposal. Trends Cogn Sci 9:335–341. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Grainger J, Dufau S, Montant M, Ziegler JC, Fagot J (2012) Orthographic processing in baboons (Papio papio). Science 336:245–248. doi: 10.1126/science.1218152 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mello NK (1965) Interhemispheric reversal of mirror-image oblique lines after monocular training in pigeons. Science 148:252–254. doi: 10.1126/science.148.3667.252 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pegado F, Nakamura K, Hannagan T (2014) How does literacy break mirror invariance in the visual system? Front Psych 5:703. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00703 Google Scholar
  11. Scarf D, Boy K, Reinert AU, Devine J, Güntürkün O, Colombo M (2016) Orthographic processing in pigeons (Columba livia). Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:11272–11276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607870113 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Watanabe S (1975) Interocular transfer of generalization along line-tilt dimension in pigeons: a separation of three types of symmetric stimuli. J Psych Res 17:133–140. doi: 10.4992/psycholres1954.17.133 Google Scholar
  13. Watanabe S (1979) Mirror image discrimination with each eye in pigeons. Physiol Behav 22:331–337. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(79)90095-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Yarkoni T, Balota D, Yap M (2008) Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: a new measure of orthographic similarity Psychon. B Rev 15:971–979. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.School of PsychologyUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  3. 3.Department of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, BiopsychologyRuhr-University BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations