Advertisement

Animal Cognition

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 1165–1172 | Cite as

Is previous experience important for inhibitory control? A comparison between shelter and pet dogs in A-not-B and cylinder tasks

  • J. Fagnani
  • G. Barrera
  • F. Carballo
  • M. Bentosela
Original Paper

Abstract

This study compares the performance of two groups of dogs with different levels of social interaction with humans, shelter and pet dogs, in two inhibitory control tasks. (1) In the A-not-B task, dogs were required to resist searching for food in a previously rewarded location, and (2) in the cylinder task, dogs were required to resist approaching visible food directly in favor of a detour reaching response. Our first aim was to evaluate the importance of learning and ontogeny in performing inhibitory tasks. Also, we assessed whether there is a correlation between the two tasks by comparing performance in the same subjects. Results showed significant differences between shelter and pet dogs in the A-not-B task, with poorer performance in shelter dogs. However, no differences were found in the cylinder task. The poorer performance of shelter dogs might be related to their infrequent interaction with humans, which reduces the chances to learn to inhibit certain behaviors. This result would highlight the importance of ontogeny in developing that ability. On the other hand, no correlations were found between the two tasks, which contributes information to the debate about the context specificity of inhibitory control in dogs.

Keywords

Shelter dogs Inhibitory control Learning A-not-B task Cylinder task 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by CONICET and AGENCIA (PICT 2010, number 38020). We would like to express our special gratitude to dogs shelter “Soplo de Vida” and specially Alan Kaminsky for their collaboration. Also, we want to express thanks to Gisela Rugna, Victoria Dzik, and Camila Cavalli for helping during data collection. Finally, we appreciate the collaboration of Dr. Claudio Pereira, and all the owners who kindly allowed their dogs to participate in these studies.

References

  1. Alexander JK, Hillier A, Smith RM, Tivarus ME, Beversdorf DQ (2007) Beta-adrenergic modulation of cognitive flexibility during stress. J Cogn Neurosci 19:468–478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnsten AF, Goldman-Rakic PS (1998) Noise stress impairs prefrontal cortical cognitive function in monkeys: evidence for a hyperdopaminergic mechanism. Arch Gen Psychiatry 55(4):362–368CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bannon S, Gonsalvez CJ, Croft RJ, Boyce PM (2002) Response inhibition deficits in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Res 110:165–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrera G, Jakovcevic A, Bentosela M (2008) Calidad de vida en perros de refugio: intervenciones para mejorar su bienestar. Suma Psicologíca 15(2):337–354Google Scholar
  5. Barrera G, Mustaca A, Bentosela M (2011) Communication between domestic dogs and humans: effects of shelter housing upon the gaze to the human. Anim Cogn 14:727–734CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrera G, Giamal Y, Mustaca A, Bentosela M (2012) Relación entre el tipo de alojamiento y las respuestas de mirada, sociabilidad y miedo-apaciguamiento en perros (association between type of housing, gaze, sociability and fear appeasement behaviors). Suma Psicologíca 19(2):7–18Google Scholar
  7. Barrera G, Giamal Y, Fagnani J, Mustaca A, Bentosela M (2013) Evaluación del temperamento en perros de refugio y de familia. Un estudio comparativo. Revista Colombiana de Psicología 22(2):307–320Google Scholar
  8. Barrera G, Fagnani J, Carballo F, Giamal Y, Bentosela M (2015) Effects of learning on social and non-social behaviors during a problem solving task in shelter and pet dogs. J Vet Behav 10(4):307–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2015.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Muraven M, Tice DM (1998) Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? J Personal Soc Psychol 74(5):1252–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bray E, MacLean E, Hare B (2014) Context specificity of inhibitory control in dogs. Anim Cogn 17:15–31. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0633-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bray E, MacLean E, Hare B (2015) Increasing arousal enhances inhibitory control in calm but not excitable dogs. Anim Cogn 8:1317–1329. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0901-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burke W, Zencius A, Wesolowski M, Doubleday F (1991) Improving executive function disorders in brain-injured clients. Brain Inj 5:241–252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. D’Aniello B, Scandurra A (2016) Ontogenetic effects on gazing behaviour: a case study of kennel dogs (Labrador Retrievers) in the impossible task paradigm. Anim Cogn. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-0958-5 Google Scholar
  14. Duckworth AL, Seligman ME (2005) Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychol Sci 16(12):939–944CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fatjó J, Amat M, Manteca X (2005) Aggression and impulsivity in dogs. Vet J 169:150–157Google Scholar
  16. Glady Y, Genty E, Roeder J-J (2012) Brown Lemurs (Eulemur fulvus) can master the qualitative version of the reverse-reward contingency. Plos One 7(10):e48378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048378 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Hare B, Tomasello M (2005) Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends Cogn Sci 9:439–444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. MacLean E, Hare B, Nunna C, Addessi E, Amici F, Andersone R et al (2014) The evolution of self-control. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(20):1–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323533111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marshall-Pescini S, Passalacqua C, Barnard S, Valsecchi P, Prato-Previde E (2009) Agility and search and rescue training differently affects pet dogs behaviour in socio-cognitive tasks. Invited paper for a special issue on the dog–human relationship. Behav Process 81:416–422. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.03.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marshall-Pescini S, Virányi Z, Range F (2015) The effect of domestication on inhibitory control: wolves and dogs compared. Plos One 10(2):e0118469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118469 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Oaten M, Cheng K (2006) Improved self-control: the benefits of a regular program of academic study. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 18:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rayment D, De Groef B, Peters R, Marston L (2015) Applied personality assessment in domestic dogs: limitations and caveats. Appl Anim Behav Sci 163:118. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.11.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roberts W, Fillmore M, Milich R (2011) Linking impulsivity and inhibitory control using manual and oculomotor response inhibition tasks. Acta Psychol 138:419–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scandurra A, Prato-Previde E, Valsecchi P, D’Aniello B (2015) Guide dogs as model for investigating the effect of life experience and training on gazing behaviour. Anim Cogn 18:937–944CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Stahl C, Voss A, Schmitz F, Nuszbaum M, Tüscher O, Lieb K et al (2014) Behavioral components of impulsivity. J Exp Psychol 143(2):850–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sümegi Z, Kis A, Miklósi Á, Topál J (2013) Why do adult dogs (Canis familiaris) commit the A-not-B search error? J Comp Psychol 128:21–30. doi: 10.1037/a0033084 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Tapp D, Siwak C, Estrada J, Head E, Muggenburg B, Cotman C, Milgram N (2003) Size and reversal learning in the beagle dog as a measure of executive function and inhibitory control in aging. Learn Mem 10:64–73. doi: 10.1101/lm.54403 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Topál J, Gergely G, Erdohegyi A, Csibra G, Miklosi Á (2009) Differential sensitivity to human communication in dogs, wolves, and human infants. Science 325:1269–1272. doi: 10.1126/science.1176960 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Tuber DS, Miller DD, Caris KA, Halter R, Linden F, Hennessy MB (1999) Dogs in animal shelters: problems, suggestions, and needed expertise. Psychol Sci 10:379–386. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Udell MAR, Wynne CDL (2010) Ontogeny and phylogeny: both are essential to human-sensitive behavior in the genus Canis. Anim Behav 79:e9–e14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Udell MAR, Dorey NR, Wynne CDL (2008) Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues. Anim Behav 76:1767–1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Udell MAR, Dorey NR, Wynne CDL (2010a) What did domestication do to dogs? A new account of dogs’ sensitivity to human actions. Biol Rev 85(2):327–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00104.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Udell MAR, Dorey NR, Wynne CDL (2010b) The performance of stray dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) living in a shelter on human guided object-choice tasks. Anim Behav 79:717–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wobber V, Hare B (2009) Testing the social dog hypothesis: are dogs also more skilled than chimpanzees in non-communicative social tasks? Behav Process 81:423–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wright H, Mills D, Pollux P (2011) Development and validation of a psychometric tool for assessing impulsivity in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Int J Comp Psychol 24:210–225Google Scholar
  36. Wright H, Mills D, Pollux P (2012) Behavioural and physiological correlates of impulsivity in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Physiol Behav 105:676–682CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wynne CDL, Udell MAR, Lord KA (2008) Ontogeny’s impact on human-dog communication. Anim Behav 76:e1–e4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zucca P, Antonelli F, Vallortigara G (2005) Detour behaviour in three species of birds, quails (Coturnix sp.), herring gulls (Larus cachinnans) and canaries (Serinus canaria). Anim Cogn 8:122–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Fagnani
    • 1
    • 2
  • G. Barrera
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. Carballo
    • 1
    • 3
  • M. Bentosela
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Grupo de Investigación del Comportamiento en Cánidos (ICOC)CABAArgentina
  2. 2.Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral (ICIVET Litoral), UNL-CONICETEsperanzaArgentina
  3. 3.Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas y Biomédicas del Sur (INBIOSUR; CONICET-UNS)Bahía BlancaArgentina
  4. 4.Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas (IDIM; CONICET-UBA)Buenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations