Advertisement

Animal Cognition

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 1151–1164 | Cite as

Effects of different training histories upon manufacturing a tool to solve a problem: insight in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.)

  • Hernando Borges Neves FilhoEmail author
  • Marcus Bentes de Carvalho Neto
  • Giovanni Premi Torres Taytelbaum
  • Rodolfo dos Santos Malheiros
  • Yulla Christoffersen Knaus
Original Paper

Abstract

The emergence of novel behavior is a multilayered phenomenon that comprehends distinct processes. One such process is known as insightful problem solving. “Insight” can be explained as the spontaneous interconnection of previously acquired behavioral repertoires. The objective of this study was to investigate: (1) whether capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) do show the interconnection of repertoires, and (2) whether different performances of problem solving could be produced by different training histories. Two repertoires were independently trained: (a) joining two pieces of a tool to manufacture a new tool and (b) raking food with one tool. In the test situation, food was out of reach, and two joinable pieces of a tool, different from the ones used in training, were presented. To solve the problem, the monkeys had to join the two pieces and rake the food with the new manufactured tool. In Experiment 1, one monkey received symmetric training (equal number of sessions) of both repertoires and solved the task, but not in an insightful manner. In Experiment 2, six monkeys were divided into two groups: one group received symmetric training, and the second group had asymmetrical training of the repertoires (unequal number of sessions). Subjects from the symmetric group performed as the monkey in Experiment 1; subjects from the other group showed a sudden insightful solution of the problem. The different performances in the same problem situation can be explained in terms of the behavioral history provided to each group of subjects.

Keywords

Interconnection of repertoires Innovation Creativity Tool use Causal reasoning Learning New world monkeys 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the staff of the Experimental School for Primates, of the Universidade Federal do Pará. We would also like to thank Juliane Rufino da Costa, Airton Icaro Gonzaga, Raphael Moura Cardoso, Romariz da Silva Barros, Paulo Delage, Briseida Resende, Maria Helena Hünziker, Olavo Galvão, Allen Neuringer and the anonymous reviewers that greatly improved the structure, presentation and discussions of the paper. This work was funded by a mastership grant (001/2008) conceded to the first author by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Pará (FAPESPA), Brazil.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical standard

All procedures were approved by the local and national animal research ethics committee. All procedures performed in Experiments 1 and 2 were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution at which the studies were conducted.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 352085 kb)

References

  1. Ash IK, Jee BD, Wiley J (2012) Investigating insight as sudden learning. J Probl Solving 4:a2. doi: 10.7771/1932-6246.1123 Google Scholar
  2. Barros RS, Galvão OF, Rocha AC (2005) O pesquisador na escola experimental de primatas: de experimentador a programador de contingências. Interação em Psicologia 9:201–214. doi: 10.5380/psi.v9i2.4800 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck BA (1967) A study of problem solving by gibbons. Behaviour 28:95–109. doi: 10.1163/156853967X00190 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bingham HC (1929) Chimpanzee translocation by means of boxes. Comparative psychology monographs, vol 5. John Hopkins Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  5. Birch HG (1945) The relation of previous experience to insightful problem-solving. J Comp Psychol 38:367–383. doi: 10.1037/h0056104 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2003) Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425:297–299. doi: 10.1038/nature01963 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chronicle EP, MacGregor JN, Ormerod TC (2004) What makes an insight problem? The roles of heuristics, goal conception, and solution recoding in knowledge-lean problems. J Exp Psychol Learn 30:14–27. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ciancia F (1991) Tolman and Honzik (1930) revisited or the mazes of psychology (1930–1980). Psychol Rec 41:461–472Google Scholar
  9. Cook R, Fowler C (2014) “Insight” in pigeons: absence of means–end processing in displacement tests. Anim Cogn 17:207–220. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0653-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Delage PEGA (2006) Investigações sobre o papel da generalização funcional em uma situação de resolução de problemas (“insight”) em Rattus norvegicus. Dissertation, Universidade Federal do ParáGoogle Scholar
  11. Delage PEGA, Galvão OF (2010) Generalidade da aprendizagem em situações de uso de ferramentas por um macaco-prego, Cebus apella. Psicologia: Teoria Pesquisa 26:687–694. doi: 10.1590/S0102-37722010000400012 Google Scholar
  12. Durstewitz D, Vittoz NM, Floresco SB, Seamans JK (2010) Abrupt transitions between prefrontal neural ensemble states accompany behavioral transitions during rule learning. Neuron 66:438–448. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.029 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards BJ, Rottman BM, Shankar M, Betzler R, Chituc V, Rodriguez R, Silva L, Wibecan L, Widness J, Santos LR (2014) Do capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) diagnose causal relations in the absence of a direct reward? PLoS One 9:e88595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088595 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Epstein R (1985) The spontaneous interconnection of three repertoires of behavior in a pigeon (Columba livia). Psychol Rec 35:131–141. doi: 10.1016/0149-7634(85)90009-0 Google Scholar
  15. Epstein R (1987) The spontaneous interconnection of four repertoires of behavior in a pigeon (Columba livia). J Comp Psychol 101:197–201. doi: 10.1037//0735-7036.101.2.197 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Epstein R, Kirshnit CE, Lanza RP, Rubin LC (1984) “Insight” in the pigeon: antecedents and determinants of an intelligent performance. Nature 308:61–62. doi: 10.1038/308061a0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ettlinger G (1984) Humans, apes and monkeys: the changing neuropsychological viewpoint. Neuropsychologia 22:685–696. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(84)90095-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Falótico T, Ottoni EB (2014) Sexual bias in probe tool manufacture and use by wild bearded capuchin monkeys. Behav Process 108:117–122. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.09.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferreira JSF (2008) Comportamentos novos originados a partir da interconexão de repertórios previamente treinados: uma replicação de Epstein, Kirshnit, Lanza e Rubin, 1984. Dissertation, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferreira RG, Emidio RA, Jerusalinsky L (2010) Three stones for three seeds: natural occurrence of selective tool use by Capuchins (Cebus libidinosus) based on an analysis of the weight of stones found at nutting sites. Am J Primatol 72:270–275. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20771 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Foerder P, Galloway M, Barthel T, Moore DE III, Reiss D (2011) Insightful problem solving in an asian elephant. PLoS One 6:e23251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023251 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Fragaszy DM, Visalberghi E (2004) Socially biased learning in monkeys. Learn Behav 32:24–35. doi: 10.3758/BF03196004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fragaszy DM, Visalberghi E, Fedigan LM (2004) The complete capuchin: the biology of the genus cebus. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Frank H, Frank MG (1982) Comparison of problem-solving performance in six-week old wolves and dogs. Anim Behav 30:95–98. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(82)80241-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fujita K, Kuroshima H, Asai S (2003) How do tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) understand causality involved in tool use? J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 29:233–242. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.29.3.233 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fujita K, Sato Y, Kuroshima H (2010) Learning and generalization of tool use by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in tasks involving three factors: reward, tool, and hindrance. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 37:10–19. doi: 10.1037/a0020274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Galvão OF, Barros RS, Rocha AC, Mendonça MB, Goulart PRK (2002) Escola experimental de primatas. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal) 7:361–370. doi: 10.1590/S1413-294X2002000200017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grether WF, Maslow AH (1937) An experimental study of insight in monkeys. J Comp Psychol 24:127–134. doi: 10.1037/h0057666 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guillaume P, Meyerson I (1987) Recherches sur l’usage de l’instrument chez les singes. Vrin, ParisGoogle Scholar
  30. Harlow H (1949) The formation of learning sets. Psychol Rev 56:51–65. doi: 10.1037/h0062474 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hartmann GW (1933) Insight vs. trial-and-error in the solution of problems. Am J Psychol 45:663–677. doi: 10.2307/1416194 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heinrich B (1995) An experimental investigation of insight in common ravens (Corvus corax). Auk 112:994–1003. doi: 10.2307/4089030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holt P (2008) What is a problem? Theoretical conceptions and methodological approaches to the study of problem solving. Eur J Behav An 9:157–172. doi: 10.1080/15021149.2008.11434302 Google Scholar
  34. Jackson TA (1942) Use of the stick as a tool by young chimpanzees. J Comp Psychol 34:223–235. doi: 10.1037/h0062661 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jensen R (2006) Behaviorism, latent learning, and cognitive maps: needed revisions in introductory psychology textbooks. Behav Anal 29:187–209PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Judge PG, Bruno S (2012) Transport of functionally appropriate tools by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Am J Primatol 74:199–209. doi: 10.1002/ajp.21987 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Klüver H (1933) Behavior mechanics in monkeys. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  38. Köhler W (1948) The mentality of the apes, 2nd edn. New Haven, New York. Originally published in German in 1917Google Scholar
  39. Köhler W (1959) Gestalt psychology today. Am Psychol 14:727–734. doi: 10.1037/h0042492 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leonardi JL (2012) “Insight”: um estudo experimental com ratos. Dissertation, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloGoogle Scholar
  41. Lind J, Ghirlanda S, Enquist M (2009) Insight learning or shaping? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:E76. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906120106 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Luciano C (1991) Problem solving behavior: an experimental example. Psicothema 3:297–317Google Scholar
  43. Maier NRF (1937) Reasoning in rats and human beings. Psychol Rev 44:365–378. doi: 10.1037/h0062900 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mangalam M, Fragaszy DM (2015) Wild bearded capuchin monkeys crack nuts dexterously. Curr Biol 25:1334–1339. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.03.035 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Mangalam M, Izar P, Visalberghi E, Fragaszy DM (2015) Task-specific temporal organization of percussive movements in wild bearded capuchin monkeys. Anim Behav 114:129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.01.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mannu M, Ottoni EB (2009) The enhanced tool-kit of two groups of wild bearded capuchin monkeys in the Caatinga: tool making, associative use, and secondary tools. Am J Primatol 71:242–251. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20642 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Manrique HM, Sabbatini G, Call J, Visalberghi E (2011) Tool choice on the basis of rigidity in capuchin monkeys. Anim Cogn 14:775–786. doi: 10.1007/s10071-011-0410-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mendes FDC, Cardoso RM, Ottoni EB, Izar P, Villar DNA, Marquezan RF (2015) Diversity of nutcracking tool sites used by Sapajus liidinosus in Brazilian Cerrado. Am J Primatol 77:535–546. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22373 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Menzel EW, Davenport EK, Rogers CM (1970) The developmental of tool using in wild-born and restriction-reared chimpanzees. Folia Primatol 12:273–283. doi: 10.1159/000155297 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Nakajima S, Sato M (2013) Removal of an obstacle: problem-solving behavior in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav 59:131–145. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Neves Filho HB, Stella LR, Dicezare R, Garcia-Mijares M (2015) Insight in the white rat: spontaneous interconnection of two repertoires in Rattus norvegicus. Eur J Behav Anal 16:188–201. doi: 10.1080/15021149.2015.1083283 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ottoni EB (2015) Tool use traditions in nonhuman primates: the case of tufted capuchin monkeys. Hum Ethol Bull 30:21–39Google Scholar
  53. Ottoni EB, Cardoso RM (2014) Tool use traditions’ effects on problem-solving in two wild bearded capuchin monkey (Sapajus libidinosus) populations. In: Conference: XXV Congress of the International Primatological Society, vol 404Google Scholar
  54. Ottoni EB, Izar P (2008) Capuchin monkey tool use: overview and implications. Evol Anthropol 17:171–178. doi: 10.1002/evan.20185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pechstein LA, Brown FD (1939) An experimental analysis of the alleged criteria of insight learning. J Educ Psychol 30:38–52. doi: 10.1037/h0060872 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pepperberg IM (2004) “Insightful” string-pulling in Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) is affected by vocal competence. Anim Cogn 7:263–266. doi: 10.1007/s10071-004-0218-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Premack D (1962) Reversibility of the reinforcement relation. Science 136:255–257. doi: 10.1126/science.136.3512.255 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Razran G (1961) Raphael’s “idealess” behavior. J Comp Physiol Psychol 54:366–367. doi: 10.1037/h0040989 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Resende BD, Nagy-Reis MB, Lacerda FN, Pagnotta M, Savalli C (2014) Tufted capuchin monkeys (Sapajus sp) learning how to crack nuts: does variability decline throughout development? Behav Process 109:89–94. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sabbatini G, Manrique HM, Trapanese C, Vizioli AB, Call J, Visalberghi E (2014) Sequential use of rigid and pliable tools in tufted capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.). Anim Behav 87:213–220. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.10.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schiller PH (1952) Innate constituents of complex responses in primates. Psychol Rev 59:177–191. doi: 10.1037/h0062854 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Seed AM, Boogert NJ (2013) Animal cognition: an end to insight? Curr Biol 23:R67–R69. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.043 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Shettleworth SJ (2012) Do animals have insight, and what is insight anyway? Can J Exp Psychol 66:217–266. doi: 10.1037/a0030674 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Shurcliff A, Brown D, Stollnitz F (1971) Specificity of training required for solution of a stick problem by rhesus monkey (Macaca Mulatta). Learn Motiv 2:255–270. doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(71)90026-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sidman M (1988) Tactics of scientific research: evaluating experimental data in psychology. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Sidman M (2010) Remarks on research tactics and philosophy of science. Behav Philos 38:141–144. doi: 10.1080/15021149.2011.11434379 Google Scholar
  67. Smith JD (2012) Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards. Psychol Methods 17:510–550. doi: 10.1037/a0029312 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Sturz BR, Bodily KD, Katz JS (2009) Dissociation of past and present experience in problem solving using a virtual environment. Cyberpsychol Behav 15:15–19. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Taylor AH, Elliffe D, Hunt G, Gray RD (2010) Complex cognition and behavioural innovation in new caledonian crows. P R Soc B 277:2637–2643. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Taylor AH, Knaebe B, Gray RD (2012) An end to insight? New Caledonian crows can spontaneously solve problems without planning their actions. Proc R Soc B 279:4977–4981. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1998 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Thorpe WH (1956) Learning and instinct in animals. Methuen & Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  72. Tobias GKS (2006) É possível gerar “Insight” através do ensino dos pré-requisitos por contingências de reforçamento positivo em Rattus norvegicus? Dissertation, Universidade Federal do ParáGoogle Scholar
  73. Tolman EC, Honzik CH (1930) Insight in rats. Univ Calif Publ Psychol 4:215–232Google Scholar
  74. Visalberghi E, Addessi E, Truppa V, Spagnoletti N, Ottoni E, Izar P, Fragaszy D (2009) Selection of effective stone tools by wild bearded capuchin monkeys. Curr Biol 19:213–217. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.064 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. von Bayern AMP, Heathcote RJP, Rutz C, Kacelnik A (2009) The role of experience in problem solving and innovative tool use in crows. Curr Biol 19:1965–1968. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Windholz G (1984) Pavlov vs. Köhler. Pavlov’s little-known primate research. Pavlov J Biol Sci 19:23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.12.022 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Wyrwicka W (1959) Studies on detour behavior. Behaviour 14(3):240–264. doi: 10.1163/156853959X00090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yerkes RM (1929) The great apes. New Haven, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hernando Borges Neves Filho
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marcus Bentes de Carvalho Neto
    • 2
  • Giovanni Premi Torres Taytelbaum
    • 3
  • Rodolfo dos Santos Malheiros
    • 2
  • Yulla Christoffersen Knaus
    • 4
  1. 1.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de GoiásGoiâniaBrazil
  2. 2.Núcleo de Teoria e Pesquisa do ComportamentoUniversidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)BelémBrazil
  3. 3.Universiteit van Amsterdam (UvA)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Instituto de PsicologiaUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)São PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations