The interaction of working and reference memory was studied in rats on an eight-arm radial maze. In two experiments, rats were trained to perform working memory and reference memory tasks. On working memory trials, they were allowed to enter four randomly chosen arms for reward in a study phase and then had to choose the unentered arms for reward in a test phase. On reference memory trials, they had to learn to visit the same four arms on the maze on every trial for reward. Retention was tested on working memory trials in which the interval between the study and test phase was 15 s, 15 min, or 30 min. At each retention interval, tests were performed in which the correct WM arms were either congruent or incongruent with the correct RM arms. Both experiments showed that congruency interacted with retention interval, yielding more forgetting at 30 min on incongruent trials than on congruent trials. The effect of reference memory strength on the congruency effect was examined in Experiment 1, and the effect of associating different contexts with working and reference memory on the congruency effect was studied in Experiment 2.
Working memory Reference memory Context Radial maze Rats
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Support for this research was provided by a discovery grant to the first author from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada. Heidi L. Marsh participated in this project as an NSERC Postdoctoral Fellow.
Compliance with ethical standards
The animals used in these experiments were maintained and tested in compliance with the regulations of the Western University Animal Care Committee and the Canadian Council on Animal Care.
April LB, Bruce K, Galizio M (2013) The magic number 70 (plus or minus 20): variables determining performance in the rodent odor span task. Learn Mot 44:143–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson RC, Shiffrin RM (1968) Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. In: Spence KW, Spence JT (eds) The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory. Academic Press, New York, pp 89–195Google Scholar
Baddeley AD, Hitch G (1974) Working memory. In: Bower GH (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory. Academic Press, New York, pp 47–89Google Scholar
Baddeley AD, Bressi S, Della Sala S, Logie R, Spinnler H (1991) The decline of working memory in Alzheimer’s disease: a longitudinal study. Brain 114:2521–2542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Bouton ME (1993) Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychol Bull 114:80–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Cheng K (2005) Context cues eliminate retroactive interference effects in honeybees (Apis mellifera). J Exp Biol 208:1019–1024CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Colborn M, Ahmad-Annuar A, Fauria K, Collett TS (1999) Contextual modulation of visuomotor associations in bumble-bees (Bombus terrestris). Proc R Soc Lond B 266:2413–2418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collett TS, Fauria K, Dale K, Baron J (1997) Places and patterns—a study of context learning in honeybees. J Comp Physiol A 181:343–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekamp B, Gagliardo A, Gunturkun O (2002a) Nonspatial and subdivision-specific working memory deficits after selective lesions in the avian prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 22:9573–9580PubMedGoogle Scholar
Diekamp B, Kalt T, Gunturkun O (2002b) Working memory neurons in pigeons. J Neurosci 22(RC210):1–5Google Scholar
Guitar NA, Roberts WA (2015) The interaction between working and reference spatial memories in rats on a radial maze. Behav Proc 112:100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haig KA, Rawlins JNP, Olton DS, Mead A, Taylor B (1983) Food searching strategies of rats: variables affecting the relative strength of stay and shift strategies. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 9:337–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay JF, Jacoby LL (1996) Separating habit and recollection: memory slips, process dissociations, and probability matching. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cog 22:1323–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honig WK (1978) Studies of working memory in the pigeon. In: Hulse SH, Fowler H, Honig WK (eds) Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 211–248Google Scholar
Hunsaker MR, Kesner RP (2013) The operation of pattern separation and pattern completion processes associated with different attributes or domains of memory. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37:36–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Olton DS, Schlosberg P (1978) Food-searching strategies in young rats: win-shift predominates over win-stay. J Comp Physiol Psychol 92:609–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packard MG, Hirsh R, White NM (1989) Differential effects of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on two radial maze tasks: evidence for multiple memory systems. J Neurosci 9:1465–1472PubMedGoogle Scholar
Roberts WA (1992) Foraging by rats on a radial maze: learning, memory, and decision rules. In: Gormezano I, Wasserman EA (eds) Learning and memory: the behavioral and biological substrates. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 7–23Google Scholar
Roberts WA, Santi A The comparative study of working memory. In: APA handbook of comparative cognition (in press)Google Scholar
Roberts WA, Strang C, Macpherson K (2015) Memory systems interaction in the pigeon: working and reference memory. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn 41:152–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Roberts WA, Macpherson K, Strang C (2016) Context controls access to working and reference memory in the pigeon (Columba livia). J Exp Anal Behav 105:184–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar