Animal Cognition

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 523–531 | Cite as

Preference for and discrimination of videos of conspecific social behavior in mice

  • Shigeru Watanabe
  • Kazutaka Shinozuka
  • Takefumi Kikusui
Original Paper

Abstract

We showed mice videos of three conspecific social behaviors, namely sniffing, copulation, and fighting, in pairwise combinations using iPods and evaluated preference as determined by time spent in front of each iPod. Mice preferred the copulation video to the sniffing video, the fighting video to the sniffing video, and the fighting video to the copulation video. In Experiment 1a, we used a single video clip for each social behavior but used multiple video clips for each social behavior in Experiment 2a. Next, we trained mice to discriminate between the fighting and copulation videos using a conditioned-place-preference-like task in which one video was associated with injection of morphine and the other was not. For half of the subjects, the fighting video was associated with morphine injection, and for the other half, the copulation video was associated with morphine injection. After conditioning, the mice stayed longer in the compartment with the morphine-associated video. When tested with still images obtained from the videos, mice stayed longer in the compartment with still images from the video associated with morphine injection (Experiment 1b). When we trained mice with multiple exemplars, the subjects showed generalization of preference for new video clips never shown during conditioning (Experiment 2b). These results demonstrate that mice had a preference among videos of particular behavior patterns and that they could discriminate these videos as visual category. Although relationship between real social behaviors and their videos is still open question, the preference tests suggest that the mice perceived the videos as meaningful stimuli.

Keywords

Video Social behavior Social preference Visual discrimination 

References

  1. Andrews MW, Rosenblum LA (1993) Live-social-video reward maintains joystick task performance in bonnet macaques. Percept Motor Skills 77:755–763CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Berlyne EE, Salapatek PH, Gelman RS, Zener SL (1964) Is light increment really rewarding to the rat? J Comp Physiol Psychol 58:148–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bird CD, Emethy NJ (2008) Using video playback to investigate the social preferences of rooks, Corvus frugilegus. Anim Behav 76:679–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloomsmit MA, Keeling ME, Lambeth SP (1990) Videotapes: environmental enrichment for singly housed chimpanzees. Lab Anim 19:42–46Google Scholar
  5. Borlongan C, Watanabe S (1994) Failure to discriminate conspecifics in amygdaloid lesioned mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 48:677–680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark DL, Uetz GW (1999) Video image recognition by the jumping spider Maevia inclemens (Araneae: Salticidae). Anim Behav 40:884–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. D’Eath RB, Dawkins MS (1996) Laying hens do not discriminate between video images of conspecifics. Anim Behav 52:903e912Google Scholar
  8. Deaner RO, Khera AV, Platt ML (2005) Monkeys pay per view: adaptive valuation of social images by rhesus macaques. Curr Biol 15:543–548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fujita K, Watanabe K (1995) Visual preference for closely related species by Sulawesi macaques. Amen J Primat 37:253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fussa J, Richtera SH, Steinlea J, Deuberta G, Hellwegb R, Gass P (2013) Are you real? Visual simulation of social housing by mirror image stimulation in single housed mice. Behav Brain Res 243:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grosenick L, Clement T, Femald RD (2007) Fish can infer social rank by observation alone. Nature 445:429–432CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Humphrey NK (1972) ‘Interest’ and ‘pleasure’: two determinants of a monkey’s visual preferences. Perception 1:395–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ikebuchi M, Okanoya K (1999) Male zebra finches and Bengalese finches emit directed songs to the video images of conspecific females projected onto a TFT display. Zool Sci 16:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jitsumori M, Natori M, Okuyama K (1999) Recognition of moving video images of conspecifics by pigeons: effects of individuals, static and dynamic motion cues, and movement. Anim Learn Behav 27:303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kish GB (1966) Studies of sensory reinforcement. In: Honig WH (ed) Operant behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 109–159Google Scholar
  16. Kliethermes CL, Finn DA, Vrabbe JC (2003) Validation of a modified mirrored chamber sensitive to anxiolytics and anxiogenics in mice. Psychopharmacology 169:190–197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lambery Y (1998) The mirror chamber test for testing anxiolytics: is there a mirror-induced stimulation? Physiol Behav 64:703–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Langford DJ, Crager SE, Shezad Z, Smith SB, Sotocinal SG, Levenstadt JS, Chanda ML, Levintin DJ, Mogil JS (2006) Social modulation of pain as evidence for empathy in mice. Science 312:1967–1970CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Macedonia JM, Evans CS, Losos JB (1994) Male Anolis lizards discriminate video-recorded conspecific and heterospecific displays. Anim Behav 47:1220–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maloney MA, Leighty KA, Kuhar CW, Bettinger TL (2011) Behavioral responses of silverback gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) to videos. J Appl Anim Welaf Sci 14:96–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McGregor PK, Dabelsteen T, Shepherd M, Pedersen SB (1992) The signal value of matched singing in great tits: evidence from interactive playback experiments. Anim Behav 43:987–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McKinnon JS (1995) Video mate preferences of female three-spined sticklebacks from populations with divergent male colouration. Anim Behav 50:1645–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McQuoid LM, Galef BG (1993) Social stimuli influencing feeding behaviour of Burmese fowl: a video analysis. Anim Behav 46:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mizuno M (1997) Visually-guided discrimination and preference of sexuality in female macaque monkeys. Med J Fukuoka 88:105–116Google Scholar
  25. Montgomery KC (1954) The role of the exploratory drive in learning. J Comp Physiol Psychol 47:60–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ord TJ, Christopher SE (2002) Interactive video playback and opponent assessment in lizards. Behav Proc 59:55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paxton R, Basile BM, Adachi I, Suzuki WA, Wilson ME, Hampton RR (2010) Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) rapidly learn to select dominant individuals in videos of artificial social interactions between unfamiliar conspecifics. J Comp Psychol 124:395–401CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Paz-y-Miño CG, Bond AB, Kamil AC, Balda RP (2004) Pinyon jays use transitive inference to predict social dominance. Nature 430:778–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rowland WJ, Bolyard KJ, Halpern AD (1995) The dual effect of stickleback nuptial colouration on rivals: manipulation of a graded signal using video playback. Anim Behav 50:267–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schwartz GG, Rosenblum LA (1980) Novelty, arousal, and nasal marking in the squirrel monkey. Behav Neural Biol 28:116–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sherwin CM (2004) Mirrors as potential environmental enrichment for individually housed laboratory mice. Appl Anim Behav Sci 87:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shimizu T (1998) Conspecific recognition in pigeons (Columbia livia) using dynamic video images. Behaviour 135:43e53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Takebayashi M, Funahashi S (2009) Monkeys exhibited preference for biologically non-significant visual stimuli. Psychologia 52:147–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Toubas PL, Abla KA, Cao W, Logan LG, Seale TS (1990) Latency to enter a mirrored chamber: a novel behavioral assay for anxiolytic agents. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 35:121–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Watanabe S (2002) Preference for mirror images and video image in java sparrows (Padda oryzivora). Behav Proc 60:35–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Watanabe S (2013) Preference for and discrimination of paintings by mice. PLOSONE 86:e65335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Watanabe S (2014) The dominant/subordinate relation between mice modifies the approach behavior toward a cage mate experiencing pain. Behav Proc 103:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Watanabe S, Aust U (2015) Object and picture perception. In: Call J (ed) APA handbook of comparative psychology. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (in press)Google Scholar
  39. Watanabe S, Yamashita M, Wakita M (1993) Discrimination of video images of conspecific individuals in Bengalese finches. J Ethol 11:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilson FA, Goldman-Rakic PS (1994) Viewing preferences of rhesus monkeys related to memory for complex pictures, colours and faces. Behav Brain Res 60:79–89CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Yamazaki Y, Shinohara N, Watanabe S (2004) Visual discrimination of normal and drug induced behavior in quails (Coturnix coturnix, japonica). Anim Cog 7:128–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shigeru Watanabe
    • 1
  • Kazutaka Shinozuka
    • 2
  • Takefumi Kikusui
    • 3
  1. 1.Keio UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.RIKEN Brain Science InstituteSaitamaJapan
  3. 3.Azabu UniversitySagamiharaJapan

Personalised recommendations