Understanding the intentions of others is crucial in developing positive social relationships. Comparative human and non-human animal studies have addressed the phylogenetic origin of this ability. However, few studies have explored the importance of motion information in distinguishing others’ intentions and goals in non-human primates. This study addressed whether squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) are able to perceive a goal-directed motion pattern—specifically, chasing—represented by two geometric objects. In Experiment 1, we trained squirrel monkeys to discriminate a “Chasing” sequence from a “Random” sequence. We then confirmed that this discrimination transferred to new stimuli (“Chasing” and “Random”) in a probe test. To determine whether the monkeys used similarities of trajectory to discriminate chasing from random motion, we also presented a non-chasing “Clone” sequence in which the trajectories of the two figures were identical. Three of six monkeys were able to discriminate “Chasing” from the other sequences. In Experiment 2, we confirmed humans’ recognition of chasing with the stimuli from Experiment 1. In Experiment 3, the three monkeys for which discrimination did not transfer to the new stimuli in Experiment 1 were trained to discriminate between “Chasing” and “Clone” sequences. At testing, all three monkeys had learned to discriminate chasing, and two transferred their learning to new stimuli. Our results suggest that squirrel monkeys use goal-directed motion patterns, rather than simply similarity of trajectory, to discriminate chasing. Further investigation is necessary to identify the motion characteristics that contribute to this discrimination.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The authors are grateful to Yoshihisa Osada and Koji Hori for the laboratory setting. We would also like to thank Souta Hidaka and Nobuo Masataka for their valuable comments. We appreciate the insightful input of the anonymous reviewers and the journal editor on an earlier draft of this manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Supplementary material 1 (MPG 128 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (MPG 119 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (MPG 157 kb)
Barrett HC, Todd PM, Miller GF, Blythe PW (2005) Accurate judgments of intention from motion cues alone: a cross-cultural study. Evol Hum Behav 26:313–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao T, Scholl BJ (2011) Chasing vs. stalking: interrupting the perception of animacy. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 37:669–684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Gao T, Newman GE, Scholl BJ (2009) The psychophysics of chasing: a case study in the perception of animacy. Cognit Psychol 59:154–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Gao T, Scholl BJ, McCarthy G (2012) Dissociating the detection of intentionality from animacy in the right posterior superior temporal sulcus. J Neurosci 32:14276–14280PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Gergely G, Csibra G (2003) Teleological reasoning in infancy: the naïve theory of rational action. Trends Cognit Sci 7:287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergely G, Nádasdy Z, Csibra G, Bíró S (1995) Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition 56:165–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Gillespie-Lynch K, Elias R, Escudero P, Hutman T, Johnson SP (2013) Atypical gaze following in Autism: a comparison of three potential mechanisms. J Neurodev Disord 43:2779–2792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goto K, Lea S, Dittrich W (2002) Discrimination of intentional and random motion paths by pigeons. Anim Cogn 5:119–127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Heider F, Simmel M (1944) An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am J Psychol 57:243–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson K, Appleby M, Freeman L (1999) Finding an appropriate order for a hierarchy based on probabilistic dominance. Anim Behav 57:991–998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Klin A (2000) Attributing social meaning to ambiguous visual stimuli in higher-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome: the social attribution task. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 41:831–846CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
McAleer P, Kay JW, Pollick FE, Rutherford MD (2011) Intention perception in high functioning people with Autism Spectrum Disorders using animacy displays derived from human actions. J Autism Dev Disord 41:1053–1063CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Opfer JE (2002) Identifying living and sentient kinds from dynamic information: the case of goal-directed versus aimless autonomous movement in conceptual change. Cognition 86:97–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar