Advertisement

Animal Cognition

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 1105–1112 | Cite as

Waiting for what comes later: capuchin monkeys show self-control even for nonvisible delayed rewards

  • Bonnie M. Perdue
  • Jessica L. Bramlett
  • Theodore A. Evans
  • Michael J. Beran
Original Paper

Abstract

Self-control tasks used with nonhuman animals typically involve the choice between an immediate option and a delayed, but more preferred option. However, in many self-control scenarios, not only does the more impulsive option come sooner in time, it is often more concrete than the delayed option. For example, studies have presented children with the option of eating a visible marshmallow immediately, or foregoing it for a better reward that can only be seen later. Thus, the immediately available option is visible and concrete, whereas the delayed option is not visible and more abstract. We tested eight capuchin monkeys to better understand this potential effect by manipulating the visibility of the response options and the visibility of the baiting itself. Monkeys observed two food items (20 or 5 g pieces of banana) each being placed either on top of or inside of one of the two opaque containers attached to a revolving tray apparatus, either in full view of monkeys or occluded by a barrier. Trials ended when monkeys removed a reward from the rotating tray. To demonstrate self-control, monkeys should have allowed the smaller piece of food to pass if the larger piece was forthcoming. Overall, monkeys were successful on the task, allowing a smaller, visible piece of banana to pass from reach in order to access the larger, nonvisible banana piece. This was true even when the entire baiting process took place out of sight of the monkeys. This finding suggests that capuchin monkeys succeed on self-control tasks even when the delayed option is also more abstract than the immediate one—a situation likely faced by primates in everyday life.

Keywords

Self-control Capuchin monkeys Delay of gratification Inhibition 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standard

This study complies with the ethical standards for research in the USA.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (WMV 10142 kb)

References

  1. Addessi E, Paglieri F, Beran M, Evans T, Macchitella L, De Petrillo F, Focaroli V (2013) Delay choice vs. delay maintenance: different measures of delayed gratification in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J Comp Psychol 127:392–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainslie G (1974) Impulse control in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav 21:485–489. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-485 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson JR, Kuroshima H, Fujita K (2010) Delay of gratification in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). J Comp Psychol 124:205–210. doi: 10.1037/a0018240 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beran MJ (2002) Maintenance of self-imposed delay of gratification by four chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus). J Gener Psychol 129:49–66. doi: 10.1080/00221300209602032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beran MJ, Evans TA (2006) Maintenance of delay of gratification by four chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): the effects of delayed reward visibility, experimenter presence, and extended delay intervals. Behav Process 73:315–324. doi: 10.1016/Jbeproc.2006.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berns GS, Laibson D, Loewenstein G (2007) Intertemporal choice—toward an integrative framework. Trends Cognit Sci 11:482–488. doi: 10.1016/Jtics.2007.08.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bramlett JL, Perdue BM, Evans TA, Beran MJ (2012) Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) let lesser rewards pass them by to get better rewards. Anim Cognit 15:963–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dufour V, Pele M, Sterck EHM, Thierry B (2007) Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) anticipation of food return: coping with waiting time in an exchange task. J Comp Psychol 121:145–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dufour V, Wascher CAF, Braun A, Miller R, Bugnyar T (2012) Corvids can decide if a future exchange is worth waiting for. Biol Lett 8:201–204CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans TA, Westergaard GC (2006) Self-control and tool-use in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J Comp Psychol 120:163–166. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.120.2.163 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans TA, Beran MJ (2007) Chimpanzees use self-distraction to cope with impulsivity. Biol Lett 3:599–602. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0399 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans TA, Beran MJ (2014) Monkeys wait to begin a computer task when waiting makes their responses more effective. Anim Behav Cognit 1:36–50Google Scholar
  13. Evans TA, Beran MJ, Paglieri F, Addessi E (2012) Delaying gratification for food and tokens in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): when quantity is salient, symbolic stimuli do not improve performance. Anim Cognit 15:539–548. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0482-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evans TA, Perdue BM, Parrish AE, Beran MJ (2014) Working and waiting for better rewards: self-control in two monkey species (Cebus apella and Macaca mulatta). Behav Process 103:236–242Google Scholar
  15. Logue AW (1988) Research on self-control: an integrating framework. Behav Brain Sci 11:665–709. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00053978 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mischel W, Ebbesen EB (1970) Attention in delay of gratification. J Personal Soc Psychol 16:329–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Paglieri F, Focaroli V, Bramlett J, Tierno V, McIntyre J, Addessi E, Evans TA, Beran MJ (2013) The hybrid delay task: Can capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) sustain a delay after an initial choice to do so? Behav Process 94:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Parrish AE, Perdue BM, Stromberg EE, Bania AE, Evans TA, Beran MJ (2014) Delay of gratification by orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in the accumulation task. J Comp Psychol 128:209–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pelé M, Dufour V, Micheletta J, Thierry B (2010) Long-tailed macaques display unexpected waiting abilities in exchange tasks. Anim Cognit 13:263–271. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0264-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pelé M, Micheletta J, Uhlrich P, Thierry B, Dufour V (2011) Delay maintenance in Tonkean Macaques (Macaca tonkeana) and Brown Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella). Int J Primatol 32:149–166. doi: 10.1007/s10764-010-9446-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stevens JR, Hallinan EV, Hauser MD (2005a) The ecology and evolution of patience in two New World monkeys. Biol Lett 1:223–226. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0285 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Stevens JR, Rosati AG, Ross KR, Hauser MD (2005b) Will travel for food: spatial discounting in two New World monkeys. Current Biol 15:1855–1860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tobin H, Chelonis JJ, Logue AW (1993) Choice in self-control paradigms using rats. Psychol Rec 43(3):441–453Google Scholar
  24. Vick S-J, Bovet D, Anderson J (2010) How do African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) perform on a delay of gratification task? Anim Cognit 13:351–358. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0284-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bonnie M. Perdue
    • 1
  • Jessica L. Bramlett
    • 2
  • Theodore A. Evans
    • 2
  • Michael J. Beran
    • 2
  1. 1.Agnes Scott CollegeDecaturUSA
  2. 2.Language Research CenterGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations