Animal Cognition

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 437–449 | Cite as

From colour photographs to black-and-white line drawings: an assessment of chimpanzees’ (Pan troglodytes’) transfer behaviour

Original Paper

Abstract

Over two experiments, we investigated the ability of two adolescent and two adult chimpanzees to generalise a learnt, pictorial categorisation to increasingly degraded and abstract stimuli. In Experiment 2, we further assessed the ability of the adolescent chimpanzees to engage in open-ended categorisation of black-and-white line drawings. The current results confirmed and extended previous findings, showing that sub-adult chimpanzees outperform adult chimpanzees in the categorisation of pictorial stimuli, particularly when the stimuli are more degraded and abstract in nature. However, none of the four chimpanzees showed positive transfer of their category learning to a set of black-and-white line drawings, and neither of the adolescent chimpanzees evidenced reliable open-ended categorisation of the black-and-white line drawings. The latter findings suggest that both sub-adult and adult chimpanzees find it difficult to recognise black-and-white line drawings, and that open-ended categorisation of black-and-white line drawings is challenging for chimpanzees.

Keywords

Categorisation Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytesGeneralisation Line drawings Picture recognition 

Supplementary material

10071_2014_813_MOESM1_ESM.tif (11 kb)
Fig. S1 Human participants’ mean percentage of correct responses (- STD) to the black-and-white line drawings of Set 1 (Test 1) and Set 2 (Test 2) (TIFF 11 kb)
10071_2014_813_MOESM2_ESM.tif (8 kb)
Fig. S2 Human participants’ mean rating of similarity (+ STD) between the two classes of black-and-white line drawings for Set 1 (Test 1) and Set 2 (Test 2) (TIFF 8 kb)
10071_2014_813_MOESM3_ESM.doc (38 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOC 34 kb)

References

  1. Adams B, Chan A, Callahan H, Milgram NW (2000) the canine as a model of human cognitive aging: recent developments. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 24:675–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen GJ, Rui Ni, Bower JD, Watanabe T (2010) Perceptual learning, aging, and improved visual performance in early stages of visual processing. J Vis 10:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartus RT, Dean RL III, Fleming DL (1979) Aging in the rhesus monkey: effects on visual discrimination learning and reversal learning. J Gerontol 34:209–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cabe PA (1976) Transfer of discrimination from solid objects to pictures by pigeons: a test of theoretical models of pictorial perception. Percept Psychophys 19:545–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DeLoache JS, Strauss MS, Maynard J (1979) Picture perception in infancy. Infant Behav Dev 2:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeLoache JS, Pierroutsakos SL, Uttal DH, Rosengren KS, Gottlieb A (1998) Grasping the nature of pictures. Psychol Sci 9:205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fagot J (2000) Picture perception in animals. Psychology Press, East SussexGoogle Scholar
  8. Fagot J, Parron C (2010) Picture perception in birds: perspectives from primatologists. Comp Cogn Behav Rev 5:132–135. doi:10.3819/ccbr.2010.50007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fagot J, Martin-Malivel J, Dépy D (2000) What is the evidence for an equivalence between objects and pictures in birds and nonhuman primates? In: Fagot J (ed) Picture perception in animals. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, pp 295–320Google Scholar
  10. Goldstone RL (1998) Perceptual Learning. Annu Rev Psychol 49:585–612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grether WF (1940a) Chimpanzee color vision I: hue discrimination at three spectral points. J Comp Psychol 29:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grether WF (1940b) Chimpanzee color vision II: color misture proportions. J Comp Psychol 29:179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grether WF (1940c) A comparison of human and chimpanzee spectral hue discrimination curves. J Exp Psychol 26:394–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hall G (1991) Perceptual and associative learning. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayes KJ, Hayes C (1953) Picture perception in a home-raised chimpanzee. J Comp Physiol Psychol 46:470–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hochberg J, Brooks V (1962) Pictorial recognition as an unlearned ability: a study of one child’s performance. Am J Psychol 75:624–628PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Itakura S (1994) Recognition of line-drawing representations by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). J Gen Psychol 121:189–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacobs GH, Deegan JF, Moran JL (1996) ERG measurements of the spectral sensitivity of common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Vis Res 36:2587–2594PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirkpatrick-Steger K, Wasserman EA (1996) The what and the where of the pigeon’s processing of complex visual stimuli. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 22:60–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirkpatrick-Steger K, Wasserman EA, Biederman I (1996) Effects of spatial rearrangement of object components on picture recognition in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav 65:465–475PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirkpatrick-Steger K, Wasserman EA, Biederman I (1998) Effects of geon deletion, scrambling, and movement on picture recognition in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 24:34–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Matsuno T, Tomonaga M (2008) Temporal characteristics of visibility in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens) assessed by a visual-masking paradigm. Perception 37:1258–1268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Matsuzawa T (1990) Form perception and visual acuity in a chimpanzee. Folia Primatol 55:24–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mell T, Heekeren HR, Marschner A, Wartenburger I, Villringer A, Reischies FM (2005) Effect of aging on stimulus-reward association learning. Neuropsychologia 43:554–563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reid SL, Spetch ML (1998) Perception of pictorial depth cues by pigeons. Psychon Bull Rev 5:698–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sayim B, Cavanagh P (2011) What line drawings reveal about the visual brain. Front Hum Neurosci 5:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schneider W, Eschmann A, Zuccolotto A (2002) E-Prime user’s guide. Psychology Software Tools, Inc., PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  28. Schoenbaum G, Nugent S, Saddoris MP, Gallagher M (2002) Teaching old rats new tricks: age-related impairments in olfactory reversal learning. Neurobiol Aging 23:555–564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tanaka M (2007) Recognition of pictorial representations by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Anim Cogn 10:169–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tomonaga M (2001) Investigating visual perception and cognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) through visual search and related tasks: from basic to complex processes. In: Matsuzawa T (ed) Primate origins of human cognition and behavior. Springer, Tokyo, pp 55–86Google Scholar
  31. Tomonaga M, Matsuzawa T (1992) Perception of complex geometric figures in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens): analyses of visual similarity on the basis of choice reaction time. J Comp Psychol 106:43–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Truppa V, Spinozzi G, Stegagno T, Fagot J (2009) Picture processing in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Behav Process 82:140–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Hamme LJ, Wasserman EA, Biederman I (1992) Discrimination of contour-deleted images by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 18:387–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wasserman EA, Kirkpatrick-Steger K, Van Hamme LJ, Biederman I (1993) Pigeons are sensitive to the spatial organization of complex visual stimuli. Psychol Sci 4:336–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weisman R, Spetch M (2010) Determining when birds perceive correspondence between pictures and objects: a critique. Comp Cogn Behav Rev 5:117–131. doi:10.3819/ccbr.2010.50006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zimmerman RR, Hochberg J (1971) The facilitation of picture discrimination after object discrimination learning in the neonatal monkey and probably vice versa. Psychon Sci 24:239–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Developmental and Comparative PsychologyMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary AnthropologyLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.School of Psychology and NeuroscienceUniversity of St AndrewsFifeUK

Personalised recommendations