Animal Cognition

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 423–435 | Cite as

Contextual correlates of syntactic variation in mountain and western gorilla close-distance vocalizations: Indications for lexical or phonological syntax?

  • Daniela Hedwig
  • Roger Mundry
  • Martha M. Robbins
  • Christophe Boesch
Original Paper

Abstract

The core of the generative power of human languages lies in our ability to combine acoustic units under specific rules into structurally complex and semantically rich utterances. While various animal species concatenate acoustic units into structurally elaborate vocal sequences, such compound calls do not appear to be compositional as their information content cannot be derived from the information content of each of its components. As such, animal compound calls are said to constitute a form of phonological syntax, as in the construction of words in human language, whereas evidence for rudimentary forms of lexical syntax, analogous to the construction of sentences out of words, is scarce. In a previous study, we demonstrated that the repertoire of close-distance calls of mountain and western gorillas consists of acoustic units that are either used singularly or non-randomly combined. Here, we investigate whether this syntactic variation provides indications for lexical or phonological syntax. Specifically, we examined the differences between the potential information content of compound calls and their components used singularly through investigating the contexts in which they are used. We found that the gorillas emitted compound calls in contexts similar to some but not all components, but also in a context rarely found for any of their components. As such, the investigated compound calls did not appear to be compositional as their information content cannot be derived from the information content of each of their components. Our results suggest that combining acoustic units into compound vocalizations by gorillas constitutes a form of phonological syntax, which may enable them to increase the number of messages that can be transmitted by an otherwise small repertoire of acoustic units.

Keywords

Syntax Mountain gorilla Western gorilla Close-distance vocalizations 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Uganda Wildlife Authority and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology for permission to conduct our research in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park and the Ministry of Education and Water and Forests of the government of CAR for permission to work in Dzanga-Ndoki National Park. We also thank the Institute of Tropical Forest Conservation in Uganda, as well as the Dzanga-Sangha Project in CAR, for logistical support. We are grateful for useful comments on the manuscript by Catherine Crockford and two anonymous reviewers. Special thanks go to the local Ba’Aka trackers of the Primate Habituation Program at Bai Hokou camp, Dzanga-Ndoki NP, and all ITFC field assistants for their irreplaceable help, great humor, and courage. This research was financially supported by the Leakey Foundation and the Max Planck Society.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10071_2014_812_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 kb)

References

  1. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold K, Zuberbühler K (2012) Call combinations in monkeys: compositional or idiomatic expressions? Brain Lang 120:303–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baayen RH (2008) Analysing Linguistic Data. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barr DJ, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily HJ (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. J Mem Lang 68:255–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2013) Lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.0-4Google Scholar
  6. Bauers KA (1993) A functional analysis of staccato grunt vocalizations in the stumptailed macaque (Macaca arctoides). Ethology 94:147–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bauers KA, de Waal FB (1991) “Coo” vocalizations in stumptailed macaques: a controlled functional analysis. Behaviour 119:143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bermejo M (2004) Home-range use and intergroup encounters in western gorillas (Gorilla g. Gorilla) at Lossi Forest, North Congo. Am J Primatol 64:223–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biben M, Symmes D, Masataka N (1986) Temporal and structural analysis of affiliative vocal exchanges in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). Behaviour 98:259–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boinski S (1993) Vocal coordination of troop movement among white-faced capuchin monkeys Cebus capuchinus. Am J Primatol 30:85–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boinski S, Campbell AF (1996) The huh vocalization of white-faced capuchins: a spacing call disguised as a food call? Ethology 102:826–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bouchet H, Blois-Heulin C, Pellier A, Zuberbühler K, Lemasson A (2012) Acoustic variability and individual distinctiveness in the vocal repertoire of red-capped mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus). J Comp Psych 126:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Candiotti A, Zuberbühler K, Lemasson A (2012) Context-related call combinations in female Diana monkeys. Anim Cogn 15:327–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM, Silk JB (1995) The role of grunts in reconciling opponents and facilitating interactions among adult female baboons. Anim Beh 50:249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chomsky N (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Clay Z, Zuberbühler K (2011) Bonobos extract meaning from call sequences. PLoS ONE 6:e18786PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cleveland J, Snowdon CT (1982) The complex vocal repertoire of the adult cotton-top tamarin (Saguinus oedipus oedipus). Ethology 58:231–270Google Scholar
  18. Crockford C, Boesch C (2005) Call combinations in wild chimpanzees. Behaviour 142:397–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crockford C, Herbiger I, Vigilant L, Boesch C (2004) Wild chimpanzees produce group-specific calls: a case for vocal learning? Ethology 110:221–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crockford C, Wittig RM, Mundry R, Zuberbühler K (2012) Wild chimpanzees inform ignorant group members of danger. Curr Biol 22:142–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dobson AJ (2002) An introduction to generalized linear models. CRC Press, Baton RougeGoogle Scholar
  22. Doran DM, McNeilage A (2001) Subspecific variation in gorilla behaviour: the influence of ecological and social factors. In: Robbins MM, Sicotte P, Stewart KJ (eds) Mountain gorillas: three decades of research at Karisoke. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 123–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elowson AM, Snowdon CT (1994) Pygmy marmosets, Cebuella pygmaea, modify vocal structure in response to changed social environment. Anim Beh 47:1267–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Field AP (2005) Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Fitch WT (2005) The evolution of language: a comparative review. Biol Philos 20:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H (2011) Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: overestimated effect sizes and the winner’s curse. Beh Ecol Sociobiol 65:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fossey D (1972) Vocalizations of the mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringei). Anim Behav 20:36–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An R companion to applied regression, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  29. Ghazanfar AA, Smith-Rohrberg D, Pollen AA, Hauser MD (2002) Temporal cues in the antiphonal long-calling behaviour of cottontop tamarins. Anim Behav 64:427–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goldsmith ML (2003) Comparative behavioural ecology of a lowland and highland gorilla population: where do Bwindi gorillas fit? In: Hohmann G, Robbins MM, Boesch C (eds) Feeding ecology in apes and other primates: ecological, physical and behavioural aspects. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 358–384Google Scholar
  31. Gruber T, Zuberbühler K (2013) Vocal recruitment for joint travel in Wilde Chimpanzees. PLoS ONE 8:e76073PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harcourt AH, Stewart KJ (1996) Function and meaning of wild gorilla ‘close’ calls 2. Correlations with rank and relatedness. Behaviour 133:827–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harcourt AH, Stewart KJ (2001) Vocal relationships of wild mountain gorillas. In: Robbins MM, Sicotte P, Stewart KJ (eds) Mountain gorillas: three decades of research at Karisoke. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 241–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harcourt AH, Stewart KJ, Harcourt DE (1986) Vocalizations and social relationships of wild gorillas: a preliminary analysis. In: Taub DM, King FA (eds) Current perspectives in primate social dynamics. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, pp 346–356Google Scholar
  35. Harcourt AH, Stewart KJ, Hauser M (1993) Functions of wild gorilla `close calls´. I. Repertoire, context, and interspecific comparison. Behaviour 124:89–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hauser MD, Chomsky N, Fitch WT (2002) The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298:1569–1579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hedwig D, Hammerschmidt K, Mundry R, Robbins MM, Boesch C (2014) Acoustic structure and variation in mountain and western gorilla close calls: a syntactic approach. Behaviour 151:1091–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hurford JR (2011) The origins of grammar: language in the light of evolution II. Oxford Studies in the evolution of language. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  39. Jackendoff R (1999) Possible stages in the evolution of the language capacity. Trends Cogn Sci 3:272–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kanwal JS, Matsumura S, Ohlemiller K, Suga N (1994) Analysis of acoustic elements and syntax in communication sounds emitted by moustached bats. J Acoust Soc Am 96:1229–1254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kershenbaum A, Ilany A, Blaustein L, Geffen E (2012) Syntactic structure and geographical dialects in the songs of male rock hyraxes. Proc R Soc A 279:2974–2981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Klump GM, Maier EH (1990) Temporal summation in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). J Comp Psych 104:94–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lameira AR, de Vries H, Hardus ME, Hall CP, Mitra-Setia T, Spruijt BM, Wich SA (2013) Predator guild does not influence orangutan alarm call rates and combinations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:519–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lemasson A, Hausberger M (2011) Acoustic variability and social significance of calls in female Campbell’s monkeys (Cercopithecus campbelli campbelli). J Acoust Soc Am 129:3341–3352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marler P (1977) The structure of animal communication sounds. In: Bullock TH (ed) Recognition of complex acoustic signals: report of the Dahlem workshop. Abakon Verlagsgesellschaft, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  46. Marler P, Mitani J (1988) Vocal communication in primates and birds: parallels and contrasts. In: Todt D, Goedeking P, Symmes D (eds) Primate vocal communication. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  47. Masataka N (1989) Motivational referents of contact calls in Japanese monkeys. Ethology 80:265–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Masi S, Cipolletta C, Robbins MM (2009) Western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) change their activity patterns in response to frugivory. Am J Primatol 71:91–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mitani M (1986) Voiceprint identification and its application to sociological studies of wild Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata ayaku). Primates 27:397–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mitani JC, Marler P (1989) A phonological analysis of male gibbon singing behavior. Behaviour 109:20–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nemeth E, Dabelsteen T, Pedersen SB, Winkler H (2006) Rainforests as concert halls for birds: are reverberations improving sound transmission of long song elements? J Acoust Soc Am 119:620–626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nkurunungi JB, Ganas J, Robbins MM, Stanford CB (2005) A comparison of two mountain gorilla habitats in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda. Afr J Ecol 42:289–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nowak MA, Plotkin JB, Jansen VA (2000) The evolution of syntactic communication. Nature 404:495–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ouattara K, Lemasson A, Zuberbühler K (2009) Campbell’s monkeys use affixation to alter call meaning. PLoS ONE 4:e7808PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Owren MJ, Amoss RT, Rendall D (2011) Two organizing principles of vocal production: implications for Nonhuman and Human Primates. Am J Primatol 73:530–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Portner PH (2005) What is meaning? Fundamentals of formal semantics. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  57. R Core Development Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  58. Robbins MM (2008) Feeding competition and agonistic relationships among Bwindi Gorilla beringei. Int J Primatol 29:999–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Robbins MM (2010) Gorillas: diversity in ecology and behaviour. In: Campbell CJ, Fuentes A, MacKinnon KC, Bearder S, Stumpf R (eds) Primates in perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 326–339Google Scholar
  60. Robinson JG (1984) Syntactic structures in the vocalizations of wedge-capped capuchin monkeys, Cebus olivaceus. Behaviour 90:46–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Salmi R, Doran‐Sheehy DM (2014) The function of loud calls (Hoot Series) in wild western gorillas (Gorilla gorilla). Am J Phys Anthropol. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22575
  62. Salmi R, Hammerschmidt K, Doran-Sheehy DM (2013) Western gorilla vocal repertoire and contextual use of vocalizations. Ethology 119:831–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schaller GB (1963) The mountain gorilla. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  64. Schassburger RM (1993) Vocal communication in the timber wolf, Canis lupus, Linnaeus: structure, motivation and ontogeny. Paul Parey Scientific Publishers, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  65. Schel AM, Machanda Z, Townsend SW, Zuberbühler K, Slocombe KE (2013) Chimpanzee food calls are directed at specific individuals. Anim Behav 86:955–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schielzeth H, Forstmeier W (2009) Conclusions beyond support: overconfident estimates in mixed models. Behav Ecol 20:416–420PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2010) Production, usage, and comprehension in animal vocalizations. Brain Lang 115:92–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL, Harcourt AH, Stewart KJ (1994) The acoustic features of gorilla double grunts and their relation to behaviour. Am J Primatol 33:31–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Silk JB, Kaldor E, Boyd R (2000) Cheap talk when interests conflict. Anim Behav 59:423–432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Slocombe KE, Zuberbühler K (2005) Functionally Referential Communication in a Chimpanzee. Curr Biol 15:1779–1784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Snowdon CT (1997) Affiliative processes and vocal development. Ann N Y Acad Sci 807:340–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Snowdon CT, Cleveland J (1984) "Conversations" among Pygmy Marmosets. Am J Primatol 7:15–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stephan C, Zuberbühler K (2008) Predation increases acoustic complexity in primate alarm calls. Biol Lett 4:641–644PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stewart KJ, Harcourt AH (1994) Gorillas’ vocalizations during rest periods: signals of impending departure? Behaviour 130:29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sugiura H (1993) Temporal and acoustic correlates in vocal exchange of coo calls in Japanese macaques. Behaviour 124:207–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sugiura H (1998) Matching of acoustic features during the vocal exchange of coo calls by Japanese macaques. Anim Behav 55:673–687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sugiura H (2007) Effects of proximity and behavioral context on acoustic variation in the coo calls of Japanese macaques. Am J Primatol 69:1412–1424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Whitham JC, Gerald MS, Maestripieri D (2007) Intended receivers and functional significance of grunt and girney vocalizations in free-ranging female rhesus macaques. Ethology 113:862–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wich SA, Krutzen M, Lameira AR, Nater A, Arora N, Bastian ML, Meulman E, Morrogh-Bernard HC, Atmoko SSU, Pamungkas J, Perwitasari-Farajallah D, Hardus ME, van Noordwijk M, van Schaik CP (2012) Call cultures in orang-utans? PLoS ONE 7:e36180PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zuberbühler K (2002) A syntactic rule in forest monkey communication. Anim Beh 63:293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniela Hedwig
    • 1
  • Roger Mundry
    • 1
    • 2
  • Martha M. Robbins
    • 1
  • Christophe Boesch
    • 1
  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Department of PrimatologyLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Department of Developmental and Comparative PsychologyLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations