Evaluating handedness measures in spider monkeys
- 313 Downloads
Despite long-standing interest and a vast body of literature, there is still disagreement as to how handedness should be measured in nonhuman primates. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate two common measures of handedness in nonhuman primates using the spider monkey, a unique study species due to its lack of a thumb and limited dexterity. Contrary to our predictions and previous findings in Ateles, there was no evidence for group-level hand biases on either the coordinated bimanual TUBE task or a unimanual reaching task. At the individual level, monkeys exhibited preferences on both tasks. There was a leftward trend on the bimanual task and a rightward trend on the unimanual task. Monkeys that were strongly lateralized on the bimanual task showed a comparable hand preference on the unimanual task, whereas monkeys with a moderate preference on the bimanual task shifted to the opposite hand on the unimanual task. Comparing across measures, the two hand-use patterns reported (consistent and shift) might have obscured group-level findings, given the available sample size. Overall, these data reaffirm that task type influences hand use in primates, and multiple measures are needed to fully characterize the construct of handedness. Consideration should be given to the difficulty required between tasks as well as between species.
KeywordsHandedness Hand preference Laterality Spider monkey Nonhuman primate
We thank the DuMond Conservancy and the Monkey Jungle staff for supporting this project, especially Sharon DuMond, Carlos Fernandez, Steve Jacques, Jennifer Mathers, Hannah Patten, and Matt Rubenstein. We would also like to thank Alexandra Derr, Andres Gil, Genesis Mendoza, and Sara Neuman for their assistance with data collection.
- Erikson GE (1963) Brachiation in New World monkeys and in anthropoid apes. Symp Zool Soc Lond 10:135–164Google Scholar
- Fragaszy DM (1998) How non-human primates use their hands. In: Connolly KJ (ed) The psychobiology of the hand. Mac Keith Press, London, pp 77–96Google Scholar
- Hook-Costigan MA, Rogers LJ (1996) Hand preferences in New World primates. Int J Comp Psychol 9:173–207Google Scholar
- Hopkins WD, Fernandez-Carriba S, Wesley MJ, Hostetter A, Pilcher D, Poss S (2001) The use of bouts and frequencies in the evaluation of hand preferences for a coordinated bimanual task in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): an empirical study comparing two different indices of laterality. J Comp Psychol 115:294–299PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hopkins WD, Phillips KA, Bania A, Calcutt SE, Gardner M, Russell J, Schaeffer J, Lonsdorf EV, Ross SR, Schapiro SJ (2011) Hand preferences for coordinated bimanual actions in 777 great apes: implications for the evolution of handedness in Hominins. J Hum Evol 60:605–611PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- MacNeilage PF (2007) Present status of the postural origins theory. In: Hopkins WD (ed) The evolution of hemispheric specialization in primates. Elsevier, London, pp 59–91Google Scholar
- Maille A, Belbeoc’h C, Rossard A, Bec P, Blois-Heulin C (2013) Which are the features of the TUBE task that make it so efficient in detecting manual asymmetries? An investigation in two Cercopithecine species (Cercopithecus neglectus and Cerocebus torquatus). J Comp Psychol 127:436–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar