Advertisement

Animal Cognition

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 1365–1374 | Cite as

Interpretation of human pointing by African elephants: generalisation and rationality

  • Anna F. Smet
  • Richard W. ByrneEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Factors influencing the abilities of different animals to use cooperative social cues from humans are still unclear, in spite of long-standing interest in the topic. One of the few species that have been found successful at using human pointing is the African elephant (Loxodonta africana); despite few opportunities for learning about pointing, elephants follow a pointing gesture in an object-choice task, even when the pointing signal and experimenter’s body position are in conflict, and when the gesture itself is visually subtle. Here, we show that the success of captive African elephants at using human pointing is not restricted to situations where the pointing signal is sustained until the time of choice: elephants followed human pointing even when the pointing gesture was withdrawn before they had responded to it. Furthermore, elephants rapidly generalised their response to a type of social cue they were unlikely to have seen before: pointing with the foot. However, unlike young children, they showed no sign of evaluating the ‘rationality’ of this novel pointing gesture according to its visual context: that is, whether the experimenter’s hands were occupied or not.

Keywords

Pointing Social cues Object-choice Rationality Communication 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Wild Horizons and its board of directors in Victoria Falls for granting us permission to work with the elephants; Z. Sibanda and staff at Wild Horizons for advice and assistance with practical aspects of running the study and R. Parry and J. Dawson of the Victoria Falls Wildlife Trust for facilitation and logistical support on site. This research was carried out with funding from a departmental studentship from the School of Psychology and Neuroscience of the University of St Andrews, awarded to AFS.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

The experiments described in this paper comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.

Supplementary material

10071_2014_772_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.2 mb)
Supplementary material Online Resource 1 Supplementary results and figures. Supplementary fig. 1. Shows the mean duration of the unsustained pointing cue in Experiment 1. Supplementary fig. 2. The number of elephants that chose correctly on the first and last trials of each condition in Experiment 1. Supplementary fig. 3. The number of elephants that chose correctly on the first and last trials of each condition in Experiment 2. (DOCX 1255 kb)

Supplementary material Online Resource 2 Video clip from Experiment 1 showing a sustained whole-arm ipsilateral pointing trial (MPG 6290 kb)

Supplementary material Online Resource 3 Video clip from Experiment 1 showing an unsustained whole-arm ipsilateral pointing trial (MPG 5056 kb)

Supplementary material Online Resource 4 Video clip from Experiment 2 showing a ‘rational’ leg point trial (MPG 10732 kb)

Supplementary material Online Resource 5 Video clip from Experiment 2 showing an ‘irrational’ leg point trial (MPG 7612 kb)

References

  1. Anderson JR, Sallaberry P, Barbier H (1995) Use of experimenter-given cues during object-choice tasks by capuchin monkeys. Anim Behav 49:201–208. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80168-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson JR, Montant M, Schmitt D (1996) Rhesus monkeys fail to use gaze direction as an experimenter-given cue in an object-choice task. Behav Process 37:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behne T, Liszkowski U, Carpenter M, Tomasello M (2012) Twelve-month-olds’ comprehension and production of pointing. Br J Dev Psychol 30:359–375. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02043.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buttelmann D, Carpenter M, Call J, Tomasello M (2007) Enculturated chimpanzees imitate rationally. Dev Sci 10:F31–F38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00630.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buttelmann D, Carpenter M, Call J, Tomasello M (2008) Rational tool use and tool choice in human infants and great apes. Child Dev 79:609–626. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01146.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Call J, Tomasello M (1994) Production and comprehension of referential pointing by orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 108:307–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gergely G, Bekkering H, Király I (2002) Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature 415:755. doi: 10.1038/415755a PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gómez J-C (2007) Pointing behaviors in apes and human infants: a balanced interpretation. Child Dev 78:729–734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall NJ, Udell MAR, Dorey NR et al (2011) Megachiropteran bats (Pteropus) utilize human referential stimuli to locate hidden food. J Comp Psychol 125:341–346. doi: 10.1037/a0023680 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hare B (2001) Can competitive paradigms increase the validity of experiments on primate social cognition? Anim Cogn 4:269–280. doi: 10.1007/s100710100084 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hare B, Tomasello M (1999) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human and conspecific social cues to locate hidden food. J Comp Psychol 113:173–177. doi: 10.1037//0735-7036.113.2.173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hare B, Tomasello M (2004) Chimpanzees are more skilful in competitive than in cooperative cognitive tasks. Anim Behav 68:571–581. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1634–1636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hare B, Plyusnina I, Ignacio N et al (2005) Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication. Curr Biol 15:226–230. doi: 10.1016/j PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Herman LM, Abichandani SL, Elhajj AN et al (1999) Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) comprehend the referential character of the human pointing gesture. J Comp Psychol 113:347–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hobaiter C, Leavens DA, Byrne RW (2013) Deictic Gesturing in Wild Chimpanzees, (Pan troglodytes)? Some possible cases. J Comp Psychol. doi: 10.1037/a0033757
  17. Hoppitt W, Laland KN (2013) Social learning: an introduction to mechanisms, methods, and models. Princeton University Press, Princeton, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Itakura S, Tanaka M (1998) Use of experimenter-given cues during object-choice tasks by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), and human infants (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 112:119–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Itakura S, Agnetta B, Hare B, Tomasello M (1999) Chimpanzee use of human and conspecific social cues to locate hidden food. Dev Sci 2:448–456. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M (2005) Domestic goats, Capra hircus, follow gaze direction and use social cues in an object choice task. Anim Behav 69:11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.05.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaminski J, Nitzschner M, Wobber V et al (2011) Do dogs distinguish rational from irrational acts? Anim Behav 81:195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lair RC (1997) Gone astray—the care and management of the Asian elephant in domesticity. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, RomeGoogle Scholar
  23. Leavens DA, Hopkins WD (1998) Intentional communication by chimpanzees: a cross-sectional study of the use of referential gestures. Dev Psychol 34:813–822PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Leavens DA, Hopkins WD (1999) The whole-hand point: the structure and function of pointing from a comparative perspective. J Comp Psychol 113:417–425PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Leavens DA, Hopkins WD, Bard KA (1996) Indexical and referential pointing in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 110:346–353PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyn H, Russell JL, Hopkins WD (2010) The impact of environment on the comprehension of declarative communication in apes. Psychol Sci 21:360–365. doi: 10.1177/0956797610362218 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miklósi Á, Soproni K (2006) A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Anim Cogn 9:81–93. doi: 10.1007/s10071-005-0008-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miklósi Á, Polgárdi R, Topál J, Csányi V (1998) Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs. Anim Cogn 1:113–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Topál J et al (2003) A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. Curr Biol 13:763–766. doi: 10.1016/S PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miklósi Á, Pongrácz P, Lakatos G et al (2005) A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans and cats (Felis catus) and humans. J Comp Psychol 119:179–186. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.2.179 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mulcahy NJ, Call J (2009) The performance of bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in two versions of an object-choice task. J Comp Psychol 123:304–309. doi: 10.1037/a0016222 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mulcahy NJ, Hedge V (2012) Are great apes tested with an abject object-choice task? Anim Behav 83:313–321. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.11.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neiworth JJ, Burman MA, Basile BM, Lickteig MT (2002) Use of experimenter-given cues in visual co-orienting and in an object-choice task by a New World monkey species, cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). J Comp Psychol 116:3–11. doi: 10.1037//0735-7036.116.1.3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pack AA, Herman LM (2004) Bottlenosed dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) comprehend the referent of both static and dynamic human gazing and pointing in an object-choice task. J Comp Psychol 118:160–171. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.118.2.160 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peignot P, Anderson JR (1999) Use of experimenter-given manual and facial cues by gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) in an object-choice task. J Comp Psychol 113:253–260. doi: 10.1037//0735-7036.113.3.253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pfungst O (1911) Clever Hans (the horse of Mr von Osten): a contribution to experimental animal and human psychology. Henry Holt, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Plotnik JM, Pokorny JJ, Keratimanochaya Titiporn, Webb C et al (2013) Visual cues given by humans are not sufficient for Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) to find hidden food. PLoS One 8:e61174PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Poole JH, Granli PK (2009) ElephantVoices Gestures Database. http://www.elephantvoices.org
  39. Poole JH, Granli PK (2011) Signals, gestures and behavior of African elephants. In: Moss CJ, Croze H, Lee PC (eds) Amboseli elephants. A long-term perspect. A long-lived mammal. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 109–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Povinelli DJ, Davis DR (1994) Differences between chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens) in the resting state of the index finger: implications for pointing. J Comp Psychol 108:134–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Povinelli DJ, Nelson KE, Boysen ST (1990) Inferences about guessing and knowing by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 104:203–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Povinelli DJ, Nelson KE, Boysen ST (1992) Comprehension of role reversal in chimpanzees: evidence of empathy? Anim Behav 43:633–640Google Scholar
  43. Povinelli DJ, Bierschwale DT, Cech CG (1999) Comprehension of seeing as a referential act in young children, but not juvenile chimpanzees. Br J Dev Psychol 17:37–60. doi: 10.1348/026151099165140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Proops L, Walton M, McComb K (2010) The use of human-given cues by domestic horses, Equus caballus, during an object choice task. Anim Behav 79:1205–1209. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scheumann M, Call J (2004) The use of experimenter-given cues by South African fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus). Anim Cogn 7:224–230. doi: 10.1007/s10071-004-0216-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shapiro AD, Janik VM, Slater PJB (2003) A gray seal’s (Halichoerus grypus) responses to experimenter-given pointing and directional cues. J Comp Psychol 117:355–362. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.117.4.355 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smet AF, Byrne RW (2013) African elephants can use human pointing cues to find hidden food. Curr Biol 23:2033–2037. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.037 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Soproni K, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2002) Dogs’ (Canis familaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. J Comp Psychol 116:27–34. doi: 10.1037//0735-7036.116.1.27 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thorpe WH (1956) Learning and instinct in animals. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Tomasello M, Call J, Gluckman A (1997) Comprehension of novel communicative signs by apes and human children. Child Dev 68:1067–1080PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tomasello M, Carpenter M, Liszkowski U (2007) A new look at infant pointing. Child Dev 78:705–722. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01025.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Psychology and NeuroscienceUniversity of St AndrewsFifeScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations