Can orangutans (Pongo abelii) infer tool functionality?
- 424 Downloads
It is debatable whether apes can reason about the unobservable properties of tools. We tested orangutans for this ability with a range of tool tasks that they could solve by using observational cues to infer tool functionality. In experiment 1, subjects successfully chose an unbroken tool over a broken one when each tool’s middle section was hidden. This prevented seeing which tool was functional but it could be inferred by noting the tools’ visible ends that were either disjointed (broken tool) or aligned (unbroken tool). We investigated whether success in experiment 1 was best explained by inferential reasoning or by having a preference per se for a hidden tool with an aligned configuration. We conducted a similar task to experiment 1 and included a functional bent tool that could be arranged to have the same disjointed configuration as the broken tool. The results suggested that subjects had a preference per se for the aligned tool by choosing it regardless of whether it was paired with the broken tool or the functional bent tool. However, further experiments with the bent tool task suggested this preference was a result of additional demands of having to attend to and remember the properties of the tools from the beginning of the task. In our last experiment, we removed these task demands and found evidence that subjects could infer the functionality of a broken tool and an unbroken tool that both looked identical at the time of choice.
KeywordsOrangutans Tools Inferential reasoning Physical cognition Connectivity
A University of Queensland Fellowship awarded to N.J.M. funded the work. The research was approved by the University of Queensland’s Native/Exotic Wildlife and Marine Animals Committee and was conducted in accordance with all animal welfare laws of Australia. We thank the Singapore Zoo staff for help and advice during the study, in particular Sam Alagappasamy, John Sha Chi Munn, and all the orangutan keepers, especially Jackson Raj and Kumaran Sesshe.
Supplementary material 1 (MOV 37758 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (MOV 42646 kb)
- Povinelli DJ (2000) Folk physics for apes: a chimpanzee’s theory of how the mind works. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 206–270Google Scholar
- Shumaker RW, Walkup KR, Beck BB, Burghardt GM (2011) Animal tool behavior: the use and manufacture of tools by animals. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar