Rapid cognitive flexibility of rhesus macaques performing psychophysical task-switching
- 325 Downloads
Three rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) performed a simultaneous chaining task in which stimuli had to be sorted according to their visual properties. Each stimulus could vary independently along two dimensions (luminosity and radius), and a cue indicating which dimension to sort by was random trial to trial. These rapid and unpredictable changes constitute a task-switching paradigm, in which subjects must encode task demands and shift to whichever task-set is presently activated. In contrast to the widely reported task-switching delay observed in human studies, our subjects show no appreciable reduction in reaction times following a switch in the task requirements. Also, in contrast to the results of studies on human subjects, monkeys experienced enduring interference from trial-irrelevant stimulus features, even after exhaustive training. These results are consistent with a small but growing body of evidence that task-switching in rhesus macaques differs in basic ways from the pattern of behavior reported in studies of human cognition. Given the importance of task-switching paradigms in cognitive and clinical assessment, and the frequency with which corresponding animal models rely on non-human primates, understanding these differences in behavior is essential to the comparative study of cognitive impairment.
KeywordsComparative cognition Cognitive assessment Mental set Task-switching Rhesus macaques
This research was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grant R01 MH051153 awarded to H. S. Terrace.
- Allport A, Styles EA, Hsieh S (1994) Shifting intentional set: exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In: Ultimá C, Moscovitch M (eds) Attention and performance XV: conscious and non-conscious information processing. Bradford, Cambridge, MA, pp 421–452Google Scholar
- Jensen G, Ward RD, Balsam PD (2013b) Information: theory, brain, and behavior. J Exp Anal Behav 100:TBDGoogle Scholar
- Jersild AT (1927) Mental set and shift. Arch Psychol 89:1–82Google Scholar
- Lashley KS (1951) The problem of serial order in behavior. In: Jeffress LA (ed) Cerebral mechanisms in behavior. Wiley, New York, pp 112–131Google Scholar
- Myers JL, Well AD (2003) Research design and statistical analysis, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
- Pashler H (2000) Task switching and multitask performance. In: Monsell S, Driver J (eds) Attention and performance XVIII: control of cognitive processes. Bradford, Cambridge, MA, pp 277–307Google Scholar
- Terrace HS (1984) Simultaneous chaining: the problem it poses for traditional chaining theory. In: Commons ML, Herrnstein RJ, Wagner AR (eds) Quantitative analyses of behavior: discrimination processes. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp 115–138Google Scholar
- Whelan D (2008) Effective analysis of reaction time data. Psychol Rec 58:475–482Google Scholar