Advertisement

Animal Cognition

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 517–528 | Cite as

Sensory information and associative cues used in food detection by wild vervet monkeys

  • Julie A. TeichroebEmail author
  • Colin A. Chapman
Original Paper

Abstract

Understanding animals’ spatial perception is a critical step toward discerning their cognitive processes. The spatial sense is multimodal and based on both the external world and mental representations of that world. Navigation in each species depends upon its evolutionary history, physiology, and ecological niche. We carried out foraging experiments on wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) at Lake Nabugabo, Uganda, to determine the types of cues used to detect food and whether associative cues could be used to find hidden food. Our first and second set of experiments differentiated between vervets’ use of global spatial cues (including the arrangement of feeding platforms within the surrounding vegetation) and/or local layout cues (the position of platforms relative to one another), relative to the use of goal-object cues on each platform. Our third experiment provided an associative cue to the presence of food with global spatial, local layout, and goal-object cues disguised. Vervets located food above chance levels when goal-object cues and associative cues were present, and visual signals were the predominant goal-object cues that they attended to. With similar sample sizes and methods as previous studies on New World monkeys, vervets were not able to locate food using only global spatial cues and local layout cues, unlike all five species of platyrrhines thus far tested. Relative to these platyrrhines, the spatial location of food may need to stay the same for a longer time period before vervets encode this information, and goal-object cues may be more salient for them in small-scale space.

Keywords

Cercopithecine Spatial cognition Sensory ecology Associative cue Navigation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Uganda Wildlife Authority and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology for permission to conduct this research, and methods were approved by the McGill University Animal Care committee. We are also grateful to Dennis Twinomugisha, Patrick Omeja, Lauren Chapman, Matovu Ponsiano, Maxine White, Jan Gogarten, and Jessica Rothman, who provided assistance both in and out of the field. Paul Garber provided valuable advice at the beginning of this study, and this manuscript was improved with helpful comments from Amanda Melin. Two anonymous reviewers improved the quality of this manuscript. Funding was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

References

  1. Andrews MW (1988) Selection of food sites by Callicebus moloch and Saimiri sciureus under spatially and temporally varying food distribution. Learn Motiv 19:254–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asensio N, Brockelman WY, Malaivijitnond S, Reichard UH (2011) Gibbon travel paths are goal oriented. Anim Cogn 14:395–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balda RP, Turek RJ (1984) The cache-recovery system as an example of memory capabilities in Clark’s nutcrackers. In: Roiblat HL, Bever TG, Terrace HS (eds) Animal cognition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 513–532Google Scholar
  4. Barton RA (2006) Olfactory evolution and behavioral ecology in primates. Am J Primatol 68:545–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bicca-Marques JC (2005) The win-stay rule in within-patch foraging decisions in free-ranging titi monkeys (Callicebus cupreus cupreus) and tamarins (Saguinus imperator imperator and S. fuscicollis weddelli). J Comp Psychol 119:343–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bicca-Marques JC, Garber PA (2004) Use of spatial, visual, and olfactory information during foraging in wild nocturnal and diurnal anthropoids: a field experiment comparing Aotus, Callicebus, and Saguinus. Am J Primatol 62:171–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brodbeck DR (1994) Memory for spatial and local cues: a comparison of a storing and nonstoring species. Anim Learn Behav 22:119–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burgess N (2006) Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends Cogn Sci 10:551–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byrne RW (2000) How monkeys find their way: leaderships, coordination, and cognitive maps of African baboons. In: Boinski Sue, Garber Paul A (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. Academic Press, London, pp 239–264Google Scholar
  10. Byrne RW, Noser R, Bates LA, Jupp PE (2009) How did they get here from there? Detecting changes of direction in terrestrial ranging. Anim Behav 77:619–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cain P, Malwal S (2002) Landmark use and development of navigational behaviour in the weakly electric fish Gnathoneus petersii (Mormyridae; Teleostei). J Exper Biol 205:3915–3923Google Scholar
  12. Caine NG, Mundy NI (2000) Demonstration of a foraging advantage for trichromatic marmosets (Callithrix geoffroyi) dependent on food colour. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cartwright BA, Collett TS (1983) Landmark learning in bees: experiments and models. J Comp Physiol A 151:521–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Charles-Dominique P (1977) Ecology and behaviour of nocturnal primates. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1992) How monkeys see the world. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Cheng K (1986) A purely geometric module in the rat’s spatial representation. Cognition 23:149–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheng K (1989) The vector sum model of pigeon landmark use. J Exp Psychol 15:366–375Google Scholar
  18. Cheng K, Sherry DF (1992) Landmark-based spatial memory in birds (Parus atricapillus and Columba livia): the use of edges and distances to represent spatial positions. J Comp Psychol 106:331–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Collett TS, Cartwright BA, Smith BA (1986) Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils. J Comp Physiol A 158:835–851PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Colquhoun IC (2011) A review and interspecific comparison of nocturnal and cathemeral strepsirhine primate olfactory behavioural ecology. Int J Zool 2011:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cramer AE, Gallistel CR (1997) Vervet monkeys as travelling salesmen. Nature 387:464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cunningham EP, Janson CH (2007) Integrating information about location and value of resources by white-faced saki monkeys (Pithecia pithecia). Anim Cogn 10:293–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dolins FL (2009) Captive cotton-top tamarins’ (Saguinus oedipus oedipus) use of landmarks to localize hidden food items. Am J Primatol 71:316–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dolins FL, Mitchell RW (2010) Linking spatial cognition and spatial perception. In: Dolins FL, Mitchell RW (eds) Spatial cognition, spatial perception: mapping the self and space. Cambridge University Press, UK, pp 1–31Google Scholar
  25. Døving KB, Trotier D (1998) Structure and function of the vomeronasal organ. J Exp Biol 201:2913–2925PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Enstam Jaffe K, Isbell LA (2009) After the fire: benefits of reduced ground cover for vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). Am J Primatol 71:252–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Erhart EM, Overdorff DJ (2008) Spatial memory during foraging in Prosimian primates: Propithecus edwardsi and Eulemur fulvus rufus. Folia Primatol 79:185–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Estes RD (1992) Behaviour guide to African mammals. University of California Press, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  29. Etienne AS (1987) The control of short-distance homing in the golden hamster. In: Ellen P, Thinus-Blanc C (eds) Cognitive processes and spatial orientation in animal and man, vol 1., Experimental animal psychology and ethologyMartinus Nijohoff, Dordrectht, pp 233–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Etienne AS, Maurer R, Saucy F (1988) Limitations in the assessment of path dependent information. Behaviour 106:81–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Etienne AS, Berlie J, Georgakopoulos J, Maurer R (1998) Role of dead reckoning in navigation. In: Healy S (ed) Spatial representations in animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 54–68Google Scholar
  32. Foo P, Warren WH, Duchon A, Tarr MJ (2005) Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts. J Exp Psychol 31:195–215Google Scholar
  33. Gallistel CR (1990) The organization of learning. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Gallistel CR (2009) The importance of proving the null. Psychol Rev 116:439–453PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Garber P (1989) Role of spatial memory in primate foraging patterns: Saguinus mystax and Sagunius fuscicollis. Am J Primatol 19:203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Garber PA (2000) The ecology of group movement: evidence for the use of spatial, temporal, and social information by some primate foragers. In: Boinski S, Garber PA (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 261–298Google Scholar
  37. Garber PA, Brown E (2006) Use of landmark cues to locate feeding sites in wild capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus): an experimental field study. In: Estrada A, Garber PA, Pavelka MSM, Luecke L (eds) New perspectives in the study of Mesoamerican primates. Springer, New York, pp 311–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Garber PA, Dolins FL (1996) Testing learning paradigms in the field: evidence for use of spatial and perceptual information and rule-based foraging in wild moustached tamarins. In: Norconk MA, Rosenberger AL, Garber PA (eds) Adaptive radiation of neotropical primates. Plenum Press, New York, pp 201–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Garber PA, Lavallee A (1999) Experimental approaches to the study of primate cognition in natural and near-to-wild field settings. In: Garber PA, Leigh S (eds) Readings in the biological bases of human behavior. Pearson Custom Publishers, Massachusetts, pp 71–98Google Scholar
  40. Garber PA, Paciulli LM (1997) Experimental field study of spatial memory and learning in wild capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus). Folia Primatol 68:236–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Groves C (2001) Primate taxonomy. Smithsonian, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  42. Hermer L, Spelke ES (1994) A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children. Nature 370:57–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hribar A, Call J (2011) Great apes use landmark cues over spatial relations to find hidden food. Anim Cogn 14:623–635PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Isbell LA (2009) The fruit, the tree, and the serpent: why we see so well. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Isbell LA, Pruetz JD, Young TP (1998) Movements of vervets (Cercopithecus aethiops) and patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas) as estimators of food resource size, density, and distribution. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jacobs GH (2009) Evolution of colour vision in mammals. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 364:2957–2967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jacobs GH, Neitz M, Neitz J (1996) Mutations in S-cone pigment genes and the absence of colour vision in two species of nocturnal primate. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 263:705–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Janmaat KRL, Byrne RW, Zuberbühler K (2006a) Evidence for a spatial memory of fruiting states of rainforest trees in wild mangabeys. Anim Behav 72:797–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Janmaat KRL, Byrne RW, Zuberbühler K (2006b) Primates take weather into account when searching for fruits. Curr Biol 16:1232–1237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Janson CH (1996) Towards an experimental socioecology of primates: examples for Argentine brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella nigritus). In: Norconk MA, Rosenberger AL, Garber PA (eds) Adaptive radiation of neotropical primates. Plenum Press, New York, pp 309–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Janson CH (2007) Experimental evidence for route integration and strategic planning in wild capuchin monkeys. Anim Cogn 10:341–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Janson CH (2011) Reconciling rigor and range: observations, experiments, and quasi- experiments in field primatology. Int J Primatol 33:520–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Janson CH, Byrne R (2007) What wild primates know about resources: opening up the black box. Anim Cogn 10:357–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Janson CH, Di Bitetti MS (1997) Experimental analysis of food detection in capuchin monkeys: effects of distance, travel speed, and resource size. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kaas JH, Huerta MF (1988) The subcortical visual system of primates. In: Steklis HD, Erwin J (eds) Comparative primate biology, vol 4. Alan RLiss, New York, pp 327–391Google Scholar
  56. Kass RE, Raftery AE (1995) Bayes factors and model uncertainty. J Am Statist Ass 90:773–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kruschke JK (2011) Bayesian assessment of null values via parameter estimation and model comparison. Prospect Psychol Sci 6:299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. MacDonald SE (1994) Gorillas’ (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) spatial memory in a foraging task. J Comp Psychol 104:382–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. MacDonald SE, Agnes MM (1999) Orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus abelii) spatial memory and behavior in a foraging task. J Comp Psychol 113:213–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. MacDonald SE, Wilkie DM (1990) Yellow-nosed monkeys (Cercopithecus ascanius whitesidei) spatial memory in a simulated foraging experiment. J Comp Psychol 104:382–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. MacDonald SE, Pang JC, Gibeault S (1994) Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus jacchus) spatial memory in a foraging task: win-stay versus win-shift strategies. J Comp Psychol 108:328–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. MacKinnon J (1974) The behaviour and ecology of wild orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus). Anim Behav 22:3–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. MacLean EL, Matthews LJ, Hare BA, Nunn CL, Anderson RC, Aureli F, Brannon EM, Call J, Drea CM, Emery NJ, Haun DBM, Herrmann E, Jacobs LF, Platt ML, Rosati AG, Sandel AA, Schroepfer KK, Seed AM, Tan J, van Schaik CP, Wobber V (2012) How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology. Anim Cogn 15:223–238PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Marsh HL, Spetch ML, MacDonald SE (2011) Strategies in landmark use by orangutans and human children. Anim Cogn 14:487–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Martin RD (1990) Primate origins and evolution. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  66. McDonald JH (2009) Handbook of biological statistics, 2nd edn. Sparky House Publishing, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  67. Menzel EW (1973) Chimpanzee spatial memory organization. Science 182:943–945PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Normand E, Boesch C (2009) Sophisticated Euclidean maps in forest chimpanzees. Anim Behav 77:1195–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Noser RW, Byrne RW (2007) Mental maps in chacma baboons (Papio ursinus): using intergroup encounters as a natural experiment. Anim Cogn 10:331–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Noser RW, Byrne RW (2010) How do wild baboons (Papio ursinus) plan their routes? Travel among multiple high-quality food sources with inter-group competition. Anim Cogn 13:145–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pariente G (1979) The role of vision in prosimian behavior. In: Doyle GA, Martin RD (eds) The study of prosimian behavior. Academic Press, New York, pp 411–459Google Scholar
  72. Platt ML, Brannon EM, Briese TL, French JA (1996) Differences in feeding ecology predict differences in performance between golden lion tamaris (Leontopithecus rosalia) and Wied’s marmosets (Callithrix kuhli) on spatial and visual memory tasks. Anim Learn Behav 24:384–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Potì P, Bartolommei P, Saporiti M (2005) Landmark use by Cebus apella. Int J Primatol 26:921–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Potì P, Kanngiesser R, Saporiti M, Amiconi A, Bläsing B, Call J (2010) Searching the middle- capuchins’ (Cebus apella) and bonobos’ (Pan paniscus) behavior during a spatial search task. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 36:92–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Poucet B (1993) Spatial cognitive maps in animals: new hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms. Psychol Rev 100:163–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rushmore J, Leonhardt SD, Drea CM (2012) Sight or scent: lemur sensory reliance in detecting food quality varies with feeding ecology. PLoS One 7:e41558PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Saj TL, Paterson JD, Sicotte P (2001) The conflict between vervet monkeys and farmers at the forest edge in Entebbe, Uganda. Afr J Ecol 39:195–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Séguinot V, Maurer R, Etienne AS (1993) Dead reckoning in a small mammal: the evaluation of distance. J Comp Physiol A 173:103–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shettleworth SJ (2010) Cognition, evolution, and behavior. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  80. Skinner JD, Smithers RHN (1990) The mammals of the southern African subregion. University of Pretoria, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  81. Smith T, Rossie J (2006) Primate olfaction: anatomy and evolution. In: Brewer WJ, Castle D, Pantelis C (eds) Olfaction and the brain. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 135–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. WH Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  83. Spetch ML, Kelly DM (2006) Comparative spatial cognition: processes in landmark- and surface-based place finding. In: Wasserman EA, Zentall TR (eds) Comparative cognition: experimental explorations of animal intelligence. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 210–228Google Scholar
  84. Sumner P, Mollon JD (2000) Catarrhine photopigments and optimized for detecting targets against a foliage background. J Exp Biol 203:1963–1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Sutton JE, Olthof A, Roberts WA (2000) Landmark use by squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). Anim Lean Behav 28:28–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Suzuki S, Augerinos G, Black AH (1980) Stimulus control of spatial behavior on the eight-arm maze in rats. Learn Motiv 11:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Terborgh J (1983) Five new world primates. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  88. Valero A, Byrne RW (2007) Spider monkey ranging patterns in Mexican subtropical forest: do travel routes reflect planning? Anim Cogn 10:305–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M, Pasti G (1990) Geometric modules in animals’ spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). J Comp Psychol 104:248–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vickers NJ (2000) Mechanisms of animal navigation in odor plumes. Biol Bull 198:203–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Waller D, Lippa Y (2007) Landmarks as beacons and associative cues: their role in route learning. Mem Cogn 35:910–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wang RF, Spelke ES (2002) Human spatial representation: insights from animals. Trends Cogn Sci 6:376–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Warburton K (1990) The use of local landmarks by foraging goldfish. Anim Behav 40:500–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wehner R, Raeber F (1979) Visual spatial memories in desert ants, Cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Experientia 35:1569–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wehner R, Srinivasan MV (1981) Searching behaviour of desert ants, genus Cataglyphis. J Comp Physiol A 142:315–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wehner R, Lehrer M, Harvey P (1996) Navigation. J Exp Biol 199:1–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wrangham RW, Waterman PG (1981) Feeding behaviour of vervet monkeys on Acacia tortilis and Acacia xanthophloea: with special reference to reproductive strategies and tannin production. J Anim Ecol 50:715–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of California Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Wildlife Conservation SocietyBronxUSA

Personalised recommendations