Animal Cognition

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 237–247 | Cite as

Deferred imitation and declarative memory in domestic dogs

Original Paper

Abstract

This study demonstrates for the first time deferred imitation of novel actions in dogs (Canis familiaris) with retention intervals of 1.5 min and memory of familiar actions with intervals ranging from 0.40 to 10 min. Eight dogs were trained using the ‘Do as I do’ method to match their own behaviour to actions displayed by a human demonstrator. They were then trained to wait for a short interval to elapse before they were allowed to show the previously demonstrated action. The dogs were then tested for memory of the demonstrated behaviour in various conditions, also with the so-called two-action procedure and in a control condition without demonstration. Dogs were typically able to reproduce familiar actions after intervals as long as 10 min, even if distracted by different activities during the retention interval and were able to match their behaviour to the demonstration of a novel action after a delay of 1 min. In the two-action procedure, dogs were typically able to imitate the novel demonstrated behaviour after retention intervals of 1.5 min. The ability to encode and recall an action after a delay implies that facilitative processes cannot exhaustively explain the observed behavioural similarity and that dogs’ imitative abilities are rather based on an enduring mental representation of the demonstration. Furthermore, the ability to imitate a novel action after a delay without previous practice suggests presence of declarative memory in dogs.

Keywords

Deferred imitation Dog Declarative memory Social learning 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Hungarian Scholarship Board by providing a fellowship to C. Fugazza. A.M. also receives funding from MTA-ELTE Comparative Ethology Group (MTA01 031), and the Hungarian Science Foundation (OTKA K81953). We are also grateful to the dog owners of the Good Boy and Happy Dog School who enthusiastically participated in this research with their dogs. We thank L. Marinelli for her comments on the manuscript, C.P. West for proofreading the English of this article and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 54241 kb)

References

  1. Akins CK, Zentall TR (1996) Imitative learning in male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) using the two-action method. J Comp Psychol 110:316–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura A (1969) Social learning theory of identificatory processes. In: Goslin DA (ed) Handbook of socialization theory and research. Rand-McNally, Chicago, pp 213–262Google Scholar
  3. Barnat SB, Klein PJ, Meltzoff AN (1996) Deferred imitation across changes in context and object: memory and generalization in 14-month-old infants. Infant Behav Dev 19:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barr R, Dowden A, Hayne H (1996) Developmental changes in deferred imitation by 6- to 24-month-old infants. Infant Behav Dev 19:159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjorklund DF, Bering JM (2003) A note on the development of deferred imitation in enculturated juvenile chimpanzees (Pan troglodites). Dev Rev 23:389–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Byrne RW (1994) The evolution of intelligence. In: Slater PJB, Halliday TR (eds) Behaviour and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 223–264Google Scholar
  7. Carpenter M, Nagell K, Tomasello M (1998b) Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monogr Soc Res Child 63 (Serial No. 255)Google Scholar
  8. Dawson BV, Foss BM (1965) Observational learning in budgerigars. Anim Behav 58:151–158Google Scholar
  9. Dorrance BR, Zentall TR (2001) Imitative learning in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) depends on the motivational state of the observer quail at the time of observation. J Comp Psychol 115:62–67. doi:10.I037//0735-7036.115.1.62 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fiset S, Beaulieu C, Landry F (2003) Duration of dogs’ (Canis familiaris) working memory in search for disappearing objects. Anim Cogn 6:1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galef BJ (1988) Imitation in animals: history, definition, and interpretation of data from the psychological laboratory. In: Zentall TR, Galef BJ (eds) Social learning: psychological and biological perspectives. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 3–28Google Scholar
  12. Hare B, Tomasello M (2005) Human-like social skills in dog? Trends Cogn Sci 9:439–444. doi:10.1016/j.appalinm.2005.11.018 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1634–1636. doi:10.1126/science.1072702 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hayes KJ, Hayes C (1952) Imitation in a home-raised chimpanzee. J Comp Psychol 45:450–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heyes C, Sagerson A (2002) Testing for imitative and non-imitative social learning in the budgerigar using a two-object/two action test. Anim Behav 64:851–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horner V, Whiten A (2005) Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodites) and children (Homo sapiens). Anim Cogn 8:164–181. doi:10.1007/s10071-004-0239-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huber L, Range F, Voelkl B, Szucsich A, Virányi Z, Miklósi Á (2009) The evolution of imitation: what do the capacities of non-human animals tell us about the mechanisms of imitation? Phil. Trans R Soc B 364:2299–2309. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klein PJ, Meltzoff AN (1999) Long-term memory, forgetting and deferred imitation in 12-month-old infants. Dev Sci 2:102–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kubinyi E, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2003) Dogs (Canis familiaris) learn from their owners via observation in a manipulation task. J Comp Psychol 117(2):156–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kubinyi E, Pongrácz P, Miklósi Á (2009) Dog as a model for studying conspecific and heterospecific social learning. J Vet Behav 4:31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kupan K, Miklósi Á, Gergely G, Topál J (2010) Why do dogs (Canis familiaris) select the empty container in an observational learning task? Anim Cogn. doi:10.1007/s10071-010-0359-0 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Meltzoff AN (1995) Understanding the intentions of others: re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Dev Psychol 31:838–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miklósi Á, Soproni K (2006) A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Anim Cogn 9:81–93. doi:10.1007/s10071-005-0008-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miklósi Á, Topál J (2013) What does it take to become ‘best friends’? Evolutionary changes in canine social competence. Trends Cogn Sci 17:287–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.04.005
  25. Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Gácsi M, Virányi Z, Csányi V (2003) A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans but dogs do. Curr Biol 13:763–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2007) Big thoughts in small brains? Dogs as a model for understanding human social cognition. NeuroReport 18:467–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller HC, Rayburn-Reeves R, Zentall T (2009) Imitation and emulation by dogs using a bidirectional control procedure. Behav Process 80:109–114. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2008.09.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Óturai G, Kolling T, Hall LR, Knopf M (2012) The role of object functions for deferred imitation—do infants selectively retain and forget target actions? Infant Behav Dev 35:195–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Piaget J (1952) The origins of intelligence in children. International University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pongracz P, Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Gurobi K, Topal J, Csanyi V (2001) Social learning in dogs: the effect of a human demonstrator on the performance of dogs in a detour task. Anim Behav 62:1109–1117. doi:10.1006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pongrácz P, Miklósi Á, Timar-Geng K, Csányi V (2003) Preference for copying unambiguous demonstrations in dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 117:337–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pongrácz P, Bánhegyi P, Miklósi A (2012) When rank counts—dominant dogs learn better from a human demonstrator in a two-action test. Behaviour 149:111–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reid P (2009) Adapting to the human world: dogs’ responsiveness to our social cues. Behav Process 80:325–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thorpe WH (1963) Learning and instinct in animals, 2nd edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  35. Tomasello M (1990) Cultural transmission in tool use and communicatory signalling of chimpanzees. In: Parker S, Gibson K (eds) ‘Language’ and intelligence in monkeys and apes: comparative developmental perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 274–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Topál J, Byrne R, Miklósi Á, Csányi V (2006) Reproducing human actions and action sequences: “Do as I Do!” in a dog. Anim Cogn 9:355–367. doi:10.1007/s10071-006-0051-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van de Waal E, Claidière N, Whiten A (2012) Social learning and spread of alternatives means of opening an artificial fruit in four groups of vervet monkeys. Anim Behav 30:1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.10.008
  38. Whiten A, Custance D (1996) Studies in imitation in chimpanzees and children. In: Heyes CM, Galef BG (eds) Social learning in animals: the roots of culture. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 291–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wood D (1989) Social interaction as tutoring. In: Bornstein MH, Bruner JS (eds) Interaction in human development. Erlbaum L, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp 59–80Google Scholar
  40. Zentall TR (2006) Imitation: definitions, evidence, and mechanisms. Anim Cogn 9:335–353. doi:10.1007/s1007-006-0039-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EthologyEötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary
  2. 2.MTA-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research GroupBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations