Animal Cognition

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 685–690

Vocal recognition of owners by domestic cats (Felis catus)

Short Communication

Abstract

Domestic cats have had a 10,000-year history of cohabitation with humans and seem to have the ability to communicate with humans. However, this has not been widely examined. We studied 20 domestic cats to investigate whether they could recognize their owners by using voices that called out the subjects’ names, with a habituation–dishabituation method. While the owner was out of the cat’s sight, we played three different strangers’ voices serially, followed by the owner’s voice. We recorded the cat’s reactions to the voices and categorized them into six behavioral categories. In addition, ten naive raters rated the cats’ response magnitudes. The cats responded to human voices not by communicative behavior (vocalization and tail movement), but by orienting behavior (ear movement and head movement). This tendency did not change even when they were called by their owners. Of the 20 cats, 15 demonstrated a lower response magnitude to the third voice than to the first voice. These habituated cats showed a significant rebound in response to the subsequent presentation of their owners’ voices. This result indicates that cats are able to use vocal cues alone to distinguish between humans.

Keywords

Domestic cat Felis catus Vocal recognition Human–cat interaction 

Supplementary material

10071_2013_620_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (430 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 430 kb)

References

  1. Adachi I, Kuwahata H, Fujita K (2007) Dogs recall their owner’s face upon hearing the owner’s voice. Anim Cogn 10:17–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradshaw J, Cameron-Beaumont C (2000) The signaling repertoire of the domestic cat and its undomesticated relatives. In: Turner DC, Bateson P (eds) The domestic cat—the biology of its behaviour, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 67–93Google Scholar
  3. Call J, Bräuer J, Kaminski J, Tomasello M (2003) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. J Comp Psychol 117:257–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Casey RA, Bradshaw JWS (2008) The effects of additional socialisation for kittens in a rescue centre on their behaviour and suitability as a pet. Appl Anim Behav Sci 114:196–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charlton BD, Reby D, McComb K (2007) Female perception of size-related formant shifts in red deer, Cervus elaphus. Anim Behav 74:707–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1980) Vocal recognition in free-ranging vervet monkeys. Anim Behav 28:362–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clutton-Brock J (1988) The British museum book of cats. British Museum Publications Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Clutton-Brock J (1995) Origins of the dog: domestication and early history. In: Serpell JA (ed) The domestic dog: its evolution, behaviour, and interactions with people, 11th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 7–20Google Scholar
  9. Collard RR (1967) Fear of strangers and play behavior in kittens with varied social experience. Child Dev 38:877–891PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Driscoll CA, Menotti-Raymond M, Roca AL, Hupe K, Johnson WE, Geffen E, Harley EH, Delibes M, Pontier D, Kitchener AC, Yamaguchi N, O’Brien SJ, Macdonald DW (2007) The near eastern origin of cat domestication. Science 317:519–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Driscoll CA, Macdonald DW, O’Brien SJ (2009) From wild animals to domestic pets, an evolutionary view of domestication. PNAS 106(Suppl. 1):9971–9978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gácsi M, Miklósi Á, Varga O, Topál J, Csányi V (2004) Are readers of our face readers of our minds? Dogs (Canis familiaris) show situation-dependent recognition of human’s attention. Anim Cogn 7:144–153. doi:10.1007/s10071-003-0205-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hare B, Tomasello M (1999) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human and conspecific social cues to locate hidden food. J Comp Psychol 113:173–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1634–1636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McComb K, Moss C, Sayialel S, Baker L (2000) Unusually extensive networks of vocal recognition in African elephants. Anim Behav 59:1103–1109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McComb K, Taylor AM, Wilson C, Charlton BD (2009) The cry embedded within the purr. Curr Biol 19:R507–R508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miklósi Á, Polgárdi R, Topál J, Csányi V (1998) Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs. Anim Cogn 1:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miklósi Á, Pongrácz P, Lakatos G, Topál J, Csányi V (2005) A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans and cats (Felis catus) and humans. J Comp Psychol 119:179–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nagasawa M, Kikusui T, Onaka T, Ohta M (2009a) Dog’s gaze at its owner increases owner’s urinary oxytocin during social interaction. Horm Behav 55:434–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nagasawa M, Mogi K, Kikusui T (2009b) Attachment between humans and dogs. Jpn Psychol Res 51:209–221. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5884.2009.00402.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nagasawa M, Murai K, Mogi K, Kikusui T (2011) Dogs can discriminate human smiling faces from blank expressions. Anim Cogn 14:525–533. doi:10.1007/s10071-011-0386-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nicastro N (2004) Perceptual and acoustic evidence for species-level differences in meow vocalizations by domestic cats (Felis catus) and African wild cats (Felis silvestris lybica). J Comp Psychol 118:287–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Olmstead CE, Villablanca JR (1980) Development of behavioral audition in the kitten. Physiol Behav 24:705–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ota R, Nishimoto M, Inoue T (2005) A study on the relation between having pets, extraversion—neuroticism and psychosomatic symptoms. J Clin Educ Psychol (In Jpn) 31:83–96Google Scholar
  25. Passalacqua C, Marshall-Pescini S, Barnard S, Lakatos G, Valsecchi P, Previde EP (2011) Human-directed gazing behaviour in puppies and adult dogs, Canis lupus familiaris. Anim Behav 82:1043–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pinsker H, Kupfermann I, Castellucci V, Kandel E (1979) Habituation and dishabituation of the gill-withdrawal reflex in Aplysia. Science 167:1740–1742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Podberscek AL, Gosling SD (2000) Personality research on pets and their owners: conceptual issues and review. In: Podberscek AL, Paul ES, Serpell JA (eds) Companion animals and us: exploring the relationships between people and pets. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 143–167Google Scholar
  28. Proops L, McComb K (2012) Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic houses (Equus caballus) extends to familiar humans. Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.0626 Google Scholar
  29. Reby D, Hewison M, Izquierdo M, Pépin D (2001) Red deer (Cervus elaphus) hinds discriminate between the roars of their current harem-holder stag and those of neighbouring stags. Ethology 107:951–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rendall D, Rodman PS, Emond RE (1996) Vocal recognition of individuals and kin in free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Anim Behav 51:1007–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Savolainen P, Zhang Y, Luo J, Lundeberg J, Leitner T (2002) Genetic evidence for an East Asian origin of domestic dogs. Science 298:1610–1613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sayigh LS, Tyack PL, Wells RS, Solow AR, Scott MD, Irvine AB (1999) Individual recognition in wild bottlenose dolphins: a field test using playback experiments. Anim Behav 57:41–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schwab C, Huber L (2006) Obey or not obey? Dogs (Canis familiaris) behave differently in response to attentional states of their owners. J Comp Psychol 120:169–175. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.120.3.169 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Serpell JA (1996) Evidence for an association between pet behavior and owner attachment levels. Appl Anim Behav Sci 47:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Serpell JA (2000) Domestication and history of the cat. In: Turner DC, Bateson P (eds) The domestic cat—the biology of its behaviour, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 179–192Google Scholar
  36. Soproni K, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2001) Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 115:122–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Soproni K, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2002) Dogs’ (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. J Comp Psychol 116:27–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thompson RF, Spencer WA (1966) Habituation: a model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. Psychol Rev 73:16–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Todd NB (1978) An ecological, behavioral genetic model for the domestication of the cat. Carnivore. Carniv Mamm Incl Man 1:52–56Google Scholar
  40. Topál J, Miklósi Á, Csányi V, Dóka A (1998) Attachment behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris): a new application of Ainsworth’s (1969) strange situation test. J Comp Psychol 112:219–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turner DC (1991) The ethology of the human-cat relationship. Schweiz Arch Tierh 133:63–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Vignal C, Mathevon N, Mottin S (2004) Audience drives male songbird response to partner’s voice. Nature 430:448–451. doi:10.1038/nature02645 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vignal C, Mathevon N, Mottin S (2008) Mate recognition by female zebra finch: analysis of individuality in male call and first investigations on female decoding process. Behav Process 77:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vigne JD, Guilaine J, Debue K, Haye L, Gérard P (2004) Early taming of the cat in Cyprus. Science 304:259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vilà C, Savolainen P, Maldonado JE, Amorim IR, Rice JE, Honeycutt RL, Crandall KA, Lundeberg J, Wayne RK (1997) Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. Science 276:1687–1689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Virányi Z, Topál J, Gácsi M, Miklósi Á, Csányi V (2004) Dogs respond appropriately to cues of humans’ attentional focus. Behav Process 66:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cognitive and Behavioral Science, Graduate School of Arts and SciencesThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Neurosurgery and Brain RepairUniversity of South Florida College of MedicineTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations