Animal Cognition

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 677–684

Taking personality selection bias seriously in animal cognition research: a case study in capuchin monkeys (Sapajusapella)

  • F. Blake Morton
  • Phyllis C. Lee
  • Hannah M. Buchanan-Smith
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s10071-013-0603-5

Cite this article as:
Morton, F.B., Lee, P.C. & Buchanan-Smith, H.M. Anim Cogn (2013) 16: 677. doi:10.1007/s10071-013-0603-5

Abstract

In most experimental work on animal cognition, researchers attempt to control for multiple interacting variables by training subjects prior to testing, allowing subjects to participate voluntarily, and providing subjects with food rewards. However, do such methods encourage selection bias from subjects’ personalities? In this study, we trained eighteen zoo-housed capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella) for two experiments, under conditions of positive reinforcement (i.e. food rewards) and free-choice participation. Using a combination of behavioral and rater-based methods, we identified and validated five personality dimensions in these capuchins (Assertiveness, Openness, Neuroticism, Sociability, and Attentiveness). Scores on Openness were positively related to individual differences in monkey task participation, reflecting previous work showing that such individuals are often more active, curious, and willing to engage in testing. We also found a negative relationship between scores on Assertiveness and performance on tasks, which may reflect the trade-offs between speed and accuracy in these animals’ decision-making. Highly Assertive individuals (the most sociable within monkey groups) may also prioritize social interactions over engaging in research. Lastly, monkeys that consistently participated and performed well on both tasks showed significantly higher Openness and lower Assertiveness compared to others, mirroring relationships found between personality, participation, and performance among all participants. Participation and performance during training was clearly biased toward individuals with particular personalities (i.e. high Openness, low Assertiveness). Results are discussed in light of the need for careful interpretation of comparative data on animal cognition and the need for researchers to take personality selection bias more seriously.

Keywords

Platyrrhines Temperament Cognitive experiment Selection bias Associative learning Training 

Supplementary material

10071_2013_603_MOESM1_ESM.docx (150 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 150 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Blake Morton
    • 1
  • Phyllis C. Lee
    • 1
  • Hannah M. Buchanan-Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Behaviour and Evolution Research Group and Scottish Primate Research Group, Psychology, School of Natural SciencesUniversity of StirlingStirlingUK

Personalised recommendations