Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) transfer tokens repeatedly with a partner to accumulate rewards in a self-control task
- 326 Downloads
There has been extensive research investigating self-control in humans and nonhuman animals, yet we know surprisingly little about how one’s social environment influences self-control. The present study examined the self-control of chimpanzees in a task that required active engagement with conspecifics. The task consisted of transferring a token back and forth with a partner animal in order to accumulate food rewards, one item per token transfer. Self-control was required because at any point in the trial, either chimpanzee could obtain their accumulated rewards, but doing so discontinued the food accumulation and ended the trial for both individuals. Chimpanzees readily engaged the task and accumulated the majority of available rewards before ending each trial, and they did so across a number of conditions that varied the identity of the partner, the presence/absence of the experimenter, and the means by which they could obtain rewards. A second experiment examined chimpanzees’ self-control when given the choice between immediately available food items and a potentially larger amount of rewards that could be obtained by engaging the token transfer task with a partner. Chimpanzees were flexible in their decision-making in this test, typically choosing the option representing the largest amount of food, even if it involved delayed accumulation of the rewards via the token transfer task. These results demonstrate that chimpanzees can exhibit self-control in situations involving social interactions, and they encourage further research into this important aspect of the self-control scenario.
KeywordsSelf-control Chimpanzees Token transfer Delay of gratification Accumulation
The research was supported by National Institute of Child Health and Development (grant HD-060563). Audrey Parrish was supported, in part, by the 2CI University Doctoral Fellowship from Georgia State University, and Bonnie Perdue was supported, in part, by the Duane M. Rumbaugh Fellowship from Georgia State University. The authors thank the animal care and enrichment team at the Language Research Center.
- Beran MJ, Pate JL, Rumbaugh DM (1999) Delay of gratification in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Dev Psychobiol 34:119–127. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(199903)34:2<119:AID-DEV5>3.0.CO;2-P PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Evans TA, Perdue BM, Parrish AE, Menzel EC, Brosnan SF, Beran MJ (2012) How is chimpanzee self-control influenced by social setting? Scientifica. (article 9). doi: 10.6064/2012/654094
- Lefebvre L, Hewitt TA (1986) Food exchange in captive chimpanzees. In: Taub DM, King FA (eds) Current perspectives in primate social dynamics. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, pp 476–486Google Scholar
- Mischel W (1981) Objective and subjective rules for delay of gratification. In: Lens W, d’ Ydewalle G (eds) Cognition in human motivation and learning. Psychology Press, New York, NY, pp 33–58Google Scholar
- Moffitt TE, Arseneault L, Belsky D, Dickson N, Hancox RJ, Harrington H, Houts R, Poulton R, Roberts BW, Ross S, Sears MR, Thomson WM, Caspi A (2011) A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:2693–2698. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010076108 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rachlin H (2000) The science of self-control. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Rumbaugh DM, Washburn DA (2003) Intelligence of apes and other rational beings. Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
- Westergaard GC, Suomi SJ (1997) Transfer of tools and food between groups of tufted capuchin (Cebus apella). Am J Primatol 43:33–41. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1997)43:1<33:AID-AJP2>3.0.CO;2-Z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar