Animal Cognition

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 405–416 | Cite as

Ontogeny of object permanence in a non-storing corvid species, the jackdaw (Corvus monedula)

  • Dorottya Júlia Ujfalussy
  • Ádám Miklósi
  • Thomas Bugnyar
Original Paper

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the ontogeny of object permanence in a non-caching corvid species, the jackdaw (Corvus monedula). Jackdaws are often presented as typical examples of non-storing corvids, as they cache either very little or not at all. We used Uzgiris and Hunt’s Scale 1 tasks to determine the age at which the certain stages set in and the final stage of this capacity that is reached. Our results show that the lack of food-storing behaviour is not associated with inferior object permanence abilities in the jackdaw, as our subjects (N = 19) have reached stage 5 competence (to follow successive visible displacements) at the average age of 61 days post-hatch and showed some evidence of stage 6 competence (to follow advanced invisible displacements) at 81 days post-hatch and thereafter. As we appreciate that object permanence abilities have a very wide ecological significance, our positive results are probably the consequence of other, more fundamental ecological pressures, such as nest-hole reproduction or prey–predator interactions.

Keywords

Object permanence Jackdaw Ontogeny Non-storing Corvids 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Jackdaws for their kind and willing cooperation, the Aktion Österreich-Ungarn for financial support of this project, Prof. Dr. Kurt Kotrschal, Bruna Bonechi, Christine Pribersky-Schwab, Julian Hoskowitz and all the KLF staff for their invaluable support, and Zsuzsánna Horváth and Gabriella Lakatos for her help with statistical analysis and valuable criticism of the manuscript. The jackdaw project at KLF was funded by FWF-Project P16939-B03. All experiments were conducted in accordance with animal welfare regulations of both Austria and Hungary. Last but not least, we are most grateful to our three anonymous referees, who have been kind enough to share their expertise and insight with us in order to improve our manuscript.

References

  1. Baillargeon R (1987) Young infants’ reasoning about the physical and spatial properties of hidden objects. Cogn Dev 2:179–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baillargeon R, DeVos J (1991) Object permanence in young infants: further evidence. Child Dev 62:201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balda RP, Kamil AC (1992) Long-term spatial memory in Clark’s nutcrackers, Nucifraga columbiana. Anim Behav 44:761–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bednekoff PA, Balda RP (1996a) Social caching and observational spatial memory in Pinyon jays. Behaviour 133:807–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bednekoff PA, Balda RP (1996b) Observational spatial memory in Clark’s nutcrackers and Mexican jays. Anim Behav 52:833–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bower TGR (1982) Development in infancy, 2nd edn. W. H. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  7. Bugnyar T, Heinrich B (2005) Ravens, Corvus corax, differentiates between knowledgeable and ignorant competitors. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 272:1641–1646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bugnyar T, Kotrschal K (2002) Observational learning and the raiding of food caches in ravens, Corvus corax: is it ‘tactical’ deception? Anim Behav 64:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bugnyar T, Stöwe M, Heinrich B (2004) Ravens, Corvus corax, follow gaze direction of humans around obstacles. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 271:1331–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bugnyar T, Stöwe M, Heinrich B (2007) The ontogeny of caching in ravens, Corvus corax. Anim Behav 74:757–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Call J (2001) Object permanence in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and children (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 115:159–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clayton NS, Dickinson A (1998) Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays, Aphelocoma coerulescens. Nature 395:272–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clayton NS, Krebs JR (1994) Memory for spatial and object-specific cues in food storing and non-storing birds. J Comp Psychol 174:371–379Google Scholar
  14. Collier-Baker E, Davis JM, Suddendorf T (2004) Do dogs (Canis familiaris) understand invisible displacement? J Comp Psychol 118:421–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collier-Baker E, Davis JM, Nielsen M, Suddendorf T (2005) Do chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) understand single invisible displacements? Anim Cogn 9:55–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dally JM, Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2005) Cache protection strategies by western scrub-jays (Aphelocoma californica): implications for social cognition. Anim Behav 70:1251–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dally JM, Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2006) Food-caching western scrub-jays keep track of who was watching when. Science 312(5780):1662–1665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. de Kloet ER, Oitzl MS, Joels M (1999) Stress and cognition: are corticosteroids good or bad guys? Trends Neurosci 22:422–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Kort SR, Tebbich S, Dally JM, Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2006) The comparative cognition of caching. In: Zentall TR, Wasserman E (eds) Comparative cognition. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 602–618Google Scholar
  20. Doré FY, Dumas C (1987) Psychology of animal cognition: Piagetian studies. Psychol Bull 102:219–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doré FY, Goulet S (1998) The comparative analysis of object knowledge. In: Langer J, Killen M (eds) Piaget, evolution and development. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 55–72Google Scholar
  22. Doré FY, Fiset S, Goulet S, Dumas MC, Gagnon S (1996) Search behaviour in cats and dogs: interspecific differences in working memory and spatial cognition. Anim Learn Behav 24:142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dumas C, Wilkie DM (1995) Object permanence in ring doves (Streptopelia risoria). J Comp Psychol 109:142–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2004) The mentality of crows: convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes. Science 306(10):1903–1907PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Etienne AS (1973) Searching behaviour toward a disappearing prey in the domestic chick as affected by preliminary experience. Anim Behav 21:749–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Etienne AS (1984) The meaning of object permanence at different zoological levels. Hum Dev 27:309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fiset S, LeBlanc V (2007) Invisible displacement understanding in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris): the role of visual cues in search behavior. Anim Cogn 10:211–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Funk MS (1996) Development of object permanence in the New Zealand parakeet (Cyanoramphus auriceps). Anim Learn Behav 24:375–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Funk MS, Matteson RL (2004) Stable individual differences on developmental tasks in young yellow-crowned parakeets (Cyanoramphus auriceps). Learn Behav 32(4):427–439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gagnon S, Doré FY (1992) Search behaviour in various breeds of adult dogs (Canis familiaris): object permanence and olfactory cues. J Comp Psychol 106:58–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gagnon S, Doré FY (1994) Cross-sectional study of object permanence in domestic puppies (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 108:220–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gomez JC (2004) Apes, monkeys, children, and the growth of mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  33. Gomez JC (2005) Species comparative studies and cognitive development. Trends Cogn Sci 9:118–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harriman A, Berger R (1986) Olfactory acuity in the common raven (Corvus corax). Physiol Behav 36:257–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Healy SD, Krebs JR (1992) Food storing and the hippocampus in corvids: amount and volume are correlated. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 248:241–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heinrich B, Pepper J (1998) Influence of competitors on caching behaviour in common ravens, Corvus corax. Anim Behav 56:1083–1090PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Henty CJ (1975) Feeding and food-hiding responses of jackdaws and magpies. Br Birds 68:463–466Google Scholar
  38. Pepperberg IM (2002) The value of the Piagetian framework for comparative cognitive studies. Anim Cogn 5:177–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pepperberg IM, Willner MR, Gravitz LB (1997) Development of Piagetian object permanence in a grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). J Comp Psychol 111:63–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Piaget J (1954) The child’s construction of reality (M. Cook, Trans.). International Universities Press, New York (Original work published 1937)Google Scholar
  41. Pollok B, Prior H, Güntürkün O (2000) Development of object permanence in food-storing magpies (Pica pica). J Comp Psychol 114:148–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Salwiczek LH, Emery NJ, Schlinger B, Clayton NS (2009) Development of caching and object permanence in western scrub-jays (Aphelocoma californica): which emerges first? J Comp Psychol 123(3):295–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scheid C, Bugnyar T (2008) Short term observational spatial memory in jackdaws (Corvus monedula) and ravens (Corvus corax). Anim Cogn 11(4):691–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shettleworth SJ (2003) Memory and hippocampal specialization in food-storing birds: challenges for research on comparative cognition. Brain Behav Evol 62:108–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sophian C (1985) Understanding the movements of objects: early development in spatial cognition. Br J Dev Psychol 3:321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sophian C, Sage S (1983) Development in infants’ search for displaced objects. J Exp Child Psychol 35:143–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thas O, Rayner JCW, Best DJ (2005) Tests for symmetry based on the one-sample Wilcoxon signed rank statistic. Commun Stat Simul Comput 43(4):957–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Uzgiris IC, Hunt J (1975) Assessment in infancy: ordinal scales of psychological development. University of Illinois Press, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  49. Weir AAS, Kacelnik A (2006) A New Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides) creatively re-designs tools by bending or unbending aluminium strips. Anim Cogn 9:317–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zucca P, Milos N, Vallortigara G (2007) Piagetian object permanence and its development in Eurasian Jays (Garrulus glandarius). Anim Cogn 10(2):243–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorottya Júlia Ujfalussy
    • 3
  • Ádám Miklósi
    • 3
  • Thomas Bugnyar
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Konrad Lorenz Research StationGrünauAustria
  2. 2.Department of Cognitive BiologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  3. 3.Department of Ethology, Institute of BiologyEötvös Loránd University of Sciences (ELTE)BudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations