Advertisement

Animal Cognition

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 361–372 | Cite as

Do domestic dogs interpret pointing as a command?

  • Linda Scheider
  • Juliane Kaminski
  • Josep Call
  • Michael Tomasello
Original Paper

Abstract

Domestic dogs comprehend human gestural communication flexibly, particularly the pointing gesture. Here, we examine whether dogs interpret pointing informatively, that is, as simply providing information, or rather as a command, for example, ordering them to move to a particular location. In the first study a human pointed toward an empty cup. In one manipulation, the dog either knew or did not know that the designated cup was empty (and that the other cup actually contained the food). In another manipulation, the human (as authority) either did or did not remain in the room after pointing. Dogs ignored the human’s gesture if they had better information, irrespective of the authority’s presence. In the second study, we varied the level of authority of the person pointing. Sometimes this person was an adult, and sometimes a young child. Dogs followed children’s pointing just as frequently as they followed adults’ pointing (and ignored the dishonest pointing of both), suggesting that the level of authority did not affect their behavior. Taken together these studies suggest that dogs do not see pointing as an imperative command ordering them to a particular location. It is still not totally clear, however, if they interpret it as informative or in some other way.

Keywords

Communication Domestic dog Pointing Comprehension Imperative 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are especially grateful to the dog owners for their cooperation. We thank all students for their assistance during data collection and reliability coding, namely Susanne Mauritz, Katrin Schumann, Eileen Glabsch, Robina Thurmann, Marie Nitzschner, Lisa Heynig, Wiebke Bohnenberger, Juliane Pölchen, Peter Schuldt, Andrea Pitsch, Melanie Hartmann, Anne Hertel, Caroline Koegler, Kerstin Esau, and Bettina Müller. Juliane Kaminski was funded by a grant of the Volkswagenstiftung.

References

  1. Barth J, Reaux JE, Povinelli DJ (2005) Chimpanzees’ (Pan troglodytes) use of gaze cues in object-choice tasks: different methods yield different results. Anim Cogn 8:84–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bräuer J, Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) Making inferences about the location of hidden food: social dog, causal ape. J Comp Psychol 120:38–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Call J, Bräuer J, Kaminski J, Tomasello M (2003) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. J Comp Psychol 117:257–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carpenter M, Nagell K, Tomasello M (1998) Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 63:1–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dorey NR, Udell MAR, Wynne CDL (2010) When do domestic dogs, Canis familiaris, start to understand human pointing? The role of ontogeny in the development of interspecies communication. Anim Behav 79:37–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elgier AM, Jakovcevic A, Barrera G, Mustaca AE, Bentosela M (2009) Communication between domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans: dogs are good learners. Behav Process 81:402–408Google Scholar
  7. Gácsi M, Miklósi Á, Varga O, Topál J, Csányi V (2004) Are readers of our face readers of our minds? Dogs (Canis familiaris) show situation-dependent recognition of human’s attention. Anim Cogn 7:144–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gácsi M, Gyoöri B, Virányi Z, Kubinyi E, Range F, Belényi B, Miklósi Á (2009) Explaining dog wolf differences in utilizing human pointing gestures: selection for synergistic shifts in the development of some social skills. PLoS ONE 4:e6584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hare B, Tomasello M (2005) Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends Cognit Sci 9:439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1634–1636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaminski J, Bräuer J, Call J, Tomasello M (2009) Domestic dogs are sensitive to a human’s perspective. Behaviour 146:979–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaminski J, Schulz L, Tomasello M (2012) How dogs know when communication is intended for them. Dev Sci 15:222–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Gácsi M, Virányi Z, Csányi V (2003) A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. Curr Biol 13:763–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Povinelli DJ, Reaux JE, Bierschwale DT, Allain AD, Simon BB (1997) Exploitation of pointing as a referential gesture in young children, but not adolescent chimpanzees. Cognit Dev 12:327–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Riedel J, Schumann K, Kaminski J, Call J, Tomasello M (2008) The early ontogeny of human-dog communication. Anim Behav 75:1003–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Scheider L, Grassmann S, Kaminski J, Tomasello M (2011) Domestic dogs use contextual information and tone of voice when following a human pointing gesture. PLoS ONE 6:e21676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schwab C, Huber L (2006) Obey or not obey? Dogs (Canis familiaris) behave differently in response to attentional states of their owners. J Comp Psychol 120:169–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Szetei V, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2003) When dogs seem to lose their nose: an investigation on the use of visual and olfactory cues in communicative context between dog and owner. Appl Anim Behav Sci 83:141–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tomasello M, Call J (1997) Primate cognition. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  20. Topál J, Miklósi Á, Gácsi M, Dóka A, Pongrácz P, Kubinyi E, Virányi Z, Csányi V (2009) The dog as a model for understanding human social behavior. In: Brockmann HJ, Snowdon CT, Roper TJ, Naguib M, Wynne-Edwards KE (eds) Advances in the study of behavior, vol 39. Academic Press, London, pp 71–116Google Scholar
  21. Udell MAR, Dorey NR, Wynne CDL (2008) Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues. Anim Behav 76:1767–1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Virányi Z, Gácsi M, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Belényi B, Ujfalussy D, Miklósi Á (2008) Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolve (canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn 11:373–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wynne CDL, Udell MAR, Lord KA (2008) Ontogeny's impacts on human-dog communication. Anim Behav 76:e1–e4Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linda Scheider
    • 1
  • Juliane Kaminski
    • 1
  • Josep Call
    • 1
  • Michael Tomasello
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Developmental and Comparative PsychologyMax-Planck Institute for Evolutionary AnthropologyLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations