Cue competition effects in the planarian
The learning abilities of planarian worms (Dugesia tigrina) were assessed by using a number of Pavlovian conditioning paradigms. Experiment 1 showed that planaria were susceptible to basic conditioning in that they readily developed a conditioned response to a change in ambient luminance when it was consistently paired with an electric shock over a number of trials. In Experiment 2, the change in luminance was presented in a compound with a vibration stimulus during conditioning. Subsequent tests revealed poor conditioning of the elements compared with control groups in which the animals were conditioned in the presence of the elements alone, an instance of overshadowing. In Experiment 3, pre-training of one of the elements before compound conditioning resulted in blocking of learning about the other element. These results add to other studies that have reported cue competition effects in animal species belonging to different phyla (chordate, mollusk, arthropod), suggesting that learning in these phyla could be ruled by similar principles. The results are discussed adopting an evolutionary-comparative approach.
KeywordsInvertebrate learning Pavlovian conditioning Overshadowing Blocking
The present research was supported by an NC3Rs-LASA (UK) Small Award to the authors.
- De Houwer J, Beckers T (2003) Secondary task difficulty modulates forward blocking in human contingency learning. Q J Exp Psychol 56B:345–357Google Scholar
- Hebb D (1949) The organization of behavior. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Jensen DD (1965) Paramecia, planaria, pseudo-learning. Anim Behav 13(Supplement 1):9–20Google Scholar
- Kamin L (1965) Temporal and intensity characteristics of the conditioned stimulus. In: Prokasy WF (ed) Classical conditioning. Apple-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 118–147Google Scholar
- Kamin L (1969) Selective association and conditioning. In: Mackintosh NJ, Honig WK (eds) Fundamental issues in associative learning. Dalhousie University Press, Halifax, pp 42–64Google Scholar
- Miller RR, Matzel LD (1987) The comparator hypothesis: a response rule for the expression of associations. In: Bower GH (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation, vol 22. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 51–92Google Scholar
- Mitchell CJ, Lovibond PF (2002) Backward and forward blocking in human electrodermal conditioning: blocking requires an assumption of outcome additivity. Q J Exp Psychol 55B:311–329Google Scholar
- Pavlov IP (1927) Conditioned reflexes. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Rescorla RA, Wagner AR (1972) A theory of pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcemen. In: Black AH, Prokasy WF (eds) Classical conditioning II. Apple-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 64–99Google Scholar
- Wagner AR (1981) SOP: a model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In: Spear NE, Miller RR (eds) Information processing in animals: memory mechanisms. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 5–47Google Scholar