Animal Cognition

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 137–145 | Cite as

Can domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use referential emotional expressions to locate hidden food?

  • David ButtelmannEmail author
  • Michael Tomasello
Short Communication


Although many studies have investigated domestic dogs’ (Canis familiaris) use of human communicative cues, little is known about their use of humans’ emotional expressions. We conducted a study following the general paradigm of Repacholi in Dev Psychol 34:1017–1025, (1998) and tested four breeds of dogs in the laboratory and another breed in the open air. In our study, a human reacted emotionally (happy, neutral or disgust) to the hidden contents of two boxes, after which the dog was then allowed to choose one of the boxes. Dogs tested in the laboratory distinguished between the most distinct of the expressed emotions (Happy–Disgust condition) by choosing appropriately, but performed at chance level when the two emotions were less distinct (Happy–Neutral condition). The breed tested in the open air passed both conditions, but this breed’s differing testing setup might have been responsible for their success. Although without meaningful emotional expressions, when given a choice, these subjects chose randomly, their performance did not differ from that in the experimental conditions. Based on the findings revealed in the laboratory, we suggest that some domestic dogs recognize both the directedness and the valence of some human emotional expressions.


Emotional expressions Desires Domestic dogs Object choice 



We thank Martina Neumann, Ines Neuhof, and Julia Riedel for help conducting this research. We further thank Alexandra Rosati and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on a previous version of the manuscript.


  1. Agnetta B, Hare B, Tomasello M (2000) Cues to food location that domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) of different ages do and do not use. Anim Cogn 3:107–112. doi: 10.1007/s100710000070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bräuer J, Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) Making inferences about the location of hidden food: social dog, causal ape. J Comp Psychol 120:38–47. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.120.1.38 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buttelmann D, Call J, Tomasello M (2009) Do great apes use emotional expressions to infer desires? Dev Sci 12:688–698. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00802.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Call J, Bräuer J, Kaminski J, Tomasello M (2003) Domestic dogs are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. J Comp Psychol 117:257–263. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.117.3.257 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dorey NR, Udell MAR, Wynne CDL (2010) When do domestic dogs, Canis familiaris, start to understand human pointing? The role of ontogeny in the development of interspecies communication. Anim Behav 79:37–41. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.09.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ekman P, Friesen WV (1975) Unmasking the face. A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  7. Hare B, Tomasello M (1999) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human and conspecific social cues to locate hidden food. J Comp Psychol 113:173–177. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.113.2.173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hare B, Tomasello M (2005) Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends Cogn Sci 9:439–444. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.003 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M (1998) Communication of food location between human and dog (Canis familiaris). Evol Commun 2:137–159. doi: 10.1075/eoc.2.1.06har CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1634–1636. doi: 10.1126/science.1072702 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hare B, Rosati AG, Kaminski J, Bräuer J, Call J, Tomasello M (2010) The domestication hypothesis for dogs’ skills with human communication: a response to Udell et al. (2008) and, Wynne et al. (2008). Anim Behav 79:e1–e6. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.06.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McKinley J, Sambrook TD (2000) Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 3:13–22. doi: 10.1007/s100710050046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mesman J, van IJzendoorn Bakermans-Kranenburg MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ (2009) The many faces of the still-face paradigm: a review and meta-analysis. Dev Rev 29:120–169. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2009.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miklósi Á, Soproni K (2006) A comparative analysis of animals understanding of the human pointing gesture. Anim Cogn 9:81–93. doi: 10.1007/s10071-005-0008-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Miklósi A, Polgardi R, Topal J, Csanyi V (1998) Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs. Anim Cogn 1:113–121. doi: 10.1007/s100710050016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mills DS, Fukuzawa M, Cooper JJ (2005) The effect of emotional content of verbal commands on the response of dogs. In: Mills D et al (eds) Current issues and research in veterinary behavioural medicine—papers presented at the 5th international veterinary behavior meeting, Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, pp 217–220Google Scholar
  17. Mumme DL, Fernald A, Herrera C (1996) Infants’ responses to facial and vocal emotional signals in a social referencing paradigm. Child Dev 67:3219–3237. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01910.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nelson CA (1987) The recognition of facial expressions in the 1st 2 years of life—mechanisms of development. Child Dev 58:889–909.
  19. Repacholi BM (1998) Infants’ use of attentional cues to identify the referent of another person’s emotional expression. Dev Psychol 34:1017–1025. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.34.5.1017 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Riedel J, Buttelmann D, Call J, Tomasello M (2005) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use a physical marker to locate hidden food. Anim Cogn 9:27–35. doi: 10.1007/s10071-005-0256-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Riedel J, Schumann K, Kaminski J, Call J, Tomasello M (2008) The early ontogeny of human–dog communication. Anim Behav 75:1003–1014. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scheider L, Grassmann S, Kaminski J, Tomasello M (2011) Domestic dogs use contextual information and tone of voice when following a human pointing gesture. PLoS One 6:e21676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021676 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Soproni K, Miklósi A, Topal J, Csanyi V (2001) Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 115:122–126. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.115.2.122 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Soproni K, Miklosi A, Topal J, Csanyi V (2002) Dogs’ (Canis familaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. J Comp Psychol 116:27–34. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.116.1.27 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Szetei V, Miklósi Á, Topal J, Csanyi V (2003) When dogs seem to lose their nose: an investigation on the use of visual and olfactory cues in communicative context between dog and owner. Appl Anim Behav Sci 83:141–152. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00114-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Udell MAR, Wynne CDL (2010) Ontogeny and phylogeny: both are essential to human-sensitive behaviour in the genus Canis. Anim Behav 79:e9–e14. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.11.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Udell MAR, Dorey NR, Wynne CDL (2008a) Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues. Anim Behav 76:1767–1773. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.07.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Udell MAR, Giglio RF, Wynne CDL (2008b) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human gestures but not nonhuman tokens to find hidden food. J Comp Psychol 122:84–93. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.1.84 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Udell MAR, Dorey NR, Wynne CDL (2010) What did domestication do to dogs? A new account of dogs’ sensitivity to human actions. Biol Rev 85:327–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00104.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wobber V, Hare B, Koler-Matznick J, Wrangham R, Tomasello M (2009) Evidence for two waves of selection on the social skills of dogs. Interact Stud 10:206–224. doi: 10.1075/is.10.2.06wob CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Group “Kleinkindforschung in Thueringen”University of ErfurtErfurtGermany
  2. 2.Department of Developmental and Comparative PsychologyMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary AnthropologyLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations