Animal Cognition

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 117–125 | Cite as

Same/different discrimination by bumblebee colonies

Original Paper

Abstract

Bumblebees were exposed to a discrimination procedure in which reinforcement was contingent on choice of one of two spatial locations. The correct choice depended on whether a stimulus display contained two identical stimuli or two different stimuli. Some bees were trained with color stimuli and tested with line grating stimuli and others with the opposite arrangement. Four colonies of bumblebees produced more correct than incorrect choices to both identical and different stimuli during the transfer phase. This pattern of results is a signature of choices under control of an identity (“same/different”) concept. The results therefore indicate the existence of an identity concept in bumblebees.

Keywords

Bumblebee Concept learning Same/different concept Identity concept 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by a Faculty Summer Research Grant from Villanova University. Data from two of the bee colonies were included in the M.S. thesis of Justin Sayde, who is currently at Tufts University.

References

  1. Blaisdell AP, Cook RG (2005) Two-item same-different concept learning in pigeons. Learn Behav 33:67–77. doi: 10.3758/BF03196051 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bodily KD, Katz JS, Wright AA (2008) Matching-to-sample abstract-concept learning by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim B 34:178–184. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.34.1.178 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bovet D, Vauclair J (2001) Judgment of conceptual identity in monkeys. Psychon B Rev 8:470–475. doi: 10.3758/BF03196181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown MF, Demas GE (1994) Evidence for spatial working memory in honeybees (Apis mellifera). J Comp Psychol 108:344–352. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.108.4.344 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown MF, McKeon D, Curley T, Weston B, Lambert C, Lebowitz B (1998) Working memory for color in honeybees. Anim Learn Behav 26:264–271. doi: 10.3758/BF03199220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castro L, Kennedy PL, Wasserman EA (2010) Conditional same-different discrimination by pigeons: acquisition and generalization to novel and few-item displays. J Exp Psychol Anim B 36:23–38. doi: 10.1037/a0016326 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chittka L, Jensen K (2011) Animal cognition: concepts from apes to bees. Curr Biol 21:R116–R119. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.045 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chittka L, Thomson JD, Waser NM (1999) Flower constancy, insect psychology, and plant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 86:361–377. doi: 10.1007/s001140050636 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collett TS (2005) Invertebrate memory: honeybees with a sense of deja vu. Curr Biol 15:R419–R421. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.033 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cook RG (2002) The structure of pigeon multiple-class same-different learning. J Exp Anal Beh 78:345–364. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook RG, Wasserman EA (2006) Relational discrimination learning in pigeons. In: Wasserman EA, Zentall TR (eds) Comparative cognition: experimental explorations of animal intelligence. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 307–324Google Scholar
  12. Demas GE, Brown MF (1995) Honeybees are predisposed to win-shift but can learn to win-stay. Anim Behav 50:1041–1045. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80104-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flemming TM, Beran MJ, Washburn DA (2007) Disconnect in concept learning by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): judgment of relations and relations-between-relations. J Exp Psychol Anim B 33:55–63. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.33.1.55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. French RM (1995) The subtlety of sameness: a theory and computer model of analogy-making. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Gentner D, Holyoak KJ, Kolano JW (2001) The analogical mind: perspectives from cognitive science. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Giurfa M, Zhang SW, Jenett A, Menzel R, Srinivasan MV (2001) The concepts of ‘sameness’ and ‘difference’ in an insect. Nature 410:930–933. doi: 10.1038/35073582 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (2009) The superorganism: the beauty, elegance, and strangeness of insect societies. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. James W (1890) The principles of psychology. Holt, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Katz JS, Wright AA (2006) Same/different abstract-concept learning by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim B 32:80–86. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.1.80 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Katz JS, Wright AA, Bachevalier J (2002) Mechanisms of same/different abstract-concept learning by rhesus monkeys (Macadca mulatta). J Exp Psychol Anim B 28:358–368. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.28.4.358 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Katz JS, Wright AA, Bodily KD (2007) Issues in the comparative cognition of abstract-concept learning. Comp Cogn Behav Rev 2:79–92. doi: 10.3819/ccbr.2008.20005 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lazareva OF, Wasserman EA (2008) Categories and concepts in animals. In: Menzel R (ed) Learning theory and behavior. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 197–226Google Scholar
  23. Mercado E, Killebrew DA, Pack AA, Macha B, Herman LM (2000) Generalization of ‘same-different’ classification abilities in bottlenosed dolphins. Behav Process 50:79–94. doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00100-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Murphy GL (2002) The big book of concepts. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Nakagawa E (1993) Matching and nonmatching concept-learning in rats. Psychobiol 21:142–150Google Scholar
  26. Ohyama T, Couvillon PA, Bitterman ME (1995) Perseveration in the color choices of honeybees. J Insect Behav 8:409–415. doi: 10.1007/BF01989368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Penn DC, Holyoak KJ, Povinelli DJ (2008) Darwin’s mistake: explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behav Brain Sci 31:109–178. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X08003543 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pepperberg IM (1987) Acquisition of the same different concept by an african gray parrot (psittacus-erithacus)—learning with respect to categories of color, shape, and material. Anim Learn Behav 15:423–432. doi: 10.3758/BF03205051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Premack D (1983) The codes of man and beasts. Behav Brain Sci 6:125–137. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00015181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Raine NE, Chittka L (2007) Flower constancy and memory dynamics in bumblebees (Hymenoptera: apidae: bombus). Entomol Gen 29:179–199Google Scholar
  31. Raine NE, Chittka L (2008) The correlation of learning speed and natural foraging success in bumble-bees. Proc R Soc B 275:803–808. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1652 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raine NE, Ings TC, Dornhaus A, Saleh N, Chittka L (2006) Adaptation, genetic drift, pleiotropy, and history in the evolution of bee foraging behavior. Adv Study Behav 36:803–808. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3454(06)36007-X Google Scholar
  33. Riley DA (1968) Discrimination learning. Allyn and Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmidtke KA, Katz JS, Wright AA (2010) Differential outcomes facilitate same/different concept learning. Anim Cogn 13:583–589. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0292-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith EE, Medin DL (1981) Categories and concepts. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Wasserman EA, Young ME (2010) Same-different discrimination: the keel and backbone of thought and reasoning. J Exp Psychol Anim B 36:3–22. doi: 10.1037/a0016327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wright AA, Katz JS (2006) Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians. Behav Process 72:234–254. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wright AA, Katz JS (2007) Generalization hypothesis of abstract-concept learning: learning strategies and related issues in macaca mulatta, cebus apella, and columba livia. J Comp Psychol 121:387–397. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.4.387 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wright AA, Katz JS (2009) A case for restricted-domain relational learning. Psychon Bull Rev 16:907–913. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.907 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wright AA, Rivera JJ, Katz JS, Bachevalier J (2003) Abstract-concept learning and list-memory processing by capuchin and rhesus monkeys. J Exp Psychol Anim B 29:184–198. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.29.3.184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Young ME, Wasserman EA (1997) Entropy detection by pigeons: response to mixed visual displays after same–different discrimination training. J Exp Psychol Anim B 23:157. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.23.2.157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zentall TR, Wasserman EA, Lazareva OF, Thompson RRK, Ratterman MJ (2008) Concept learning in animals. Comp Cogn Behav Rev 3:13–45. doi: 10.3819/ccbr.2008.30002 Google Scholar
  43. Zhang SW, Bock F, Si A, Tautz J, Srinivasan MV (2005) Visual working memory in decision making by honey bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:5250–5255. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501440102 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyVillanova UniversityVillanovaUSA

Personalised recommendations