Animal Cognition

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 937–953 | Cite as

Hand preference and its flexibility according to the position of the object: a study in cercopithecines examining spontaneous behaviour and an experimental task (the Bishop QHP task)

  • Amandine ChapelainEmail author
  • Agathe Laurence
  • Marie Vimond
  • Audrey Maille
  • Hélène Meunier
  • Jacqueline Fagard
  • Jacques Vauclair
  • Catherine Blois-Heulin
Original Paper


The extant literature on manual laterality in non-human primates is inconclusive, plagued by inconsistent or contradictory findings and by disturbing methodological issues (e.g. uncontrolled influential factors, comparability issues). The present study examined hand preference and its flexibility in 15 red-capped mangabeys (C. t. torquatus) and 13 Campbell’s monkeys (C. c. campbelli), two species that differ in their degree of arboreality. We investigated the influence of the spatial position of the object on hand preference for reaching. We considered spontaneous behaviour (reaching for food during daily feeding) and an experimental task: the QHP task. The QHP is a task that is used in humans. This is a simple reaching task that involves high spatial constraints on hand use. In our study, the subject had to reach for items that were placed on a semi-circle in front of it on five positions, including in the centre position, in the ipsilateral space and in the contralateral space. We assessed hand preference for reaching in front (baseline condition), and we examined how this preference changed when reaching in lateral positions. For reaching in front, about half of the subjects were lateralized and no group-level bias occurred, for both spontaneous and experimental conditions. When considering reaching in the lateral positions, we observed that the position of the object influenced hand use: individuals used the hand that was closest to the object. The results are discussed in relation to previous findings in humans and in non-human primates and regarding theories on handedness and flexibility of hand preference.


Handedness Manual preference Monkeys Spatial constraints on hand use Reaching 



This study was supported by a French National Research Agency grant: reference ANR-08-BLAN-0011_01.


  1. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Annett M (1970) A classification of hand preference by association analysis. Br J Psychol 61:303–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Annett M (1985) Left, right, hand and brain: the right shift theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bishop DVM (1984) Using non-preferred hand skill to investigate pathological left handedness in unselected population. Dev Med Child Neurol 26:214–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop DVM, Ross VA, Daniels MS (1996) The measurement of hand preference: a validation study comparing three groups of right-handers. Br J Psychol 87:269–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryden MP, Singh M, Steenhuis RE, Clarkson KL (1994) A behavioural measure of hand preference as opposed to hand skill. Neuropsychologia 32:991–999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrne RW, Byrne JM (1991) Hand preferences in the skilled gathering tasks of mountain gorillas (Gorilla g. berengei). Cortex 27:521–546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Byrne RW, Corp N (2003) Acquisition of skilled gathering techniques in mahale chimpanzees. Pan Africa News 10:4–7Google Scholar
  9. Calvert GA, Bishop DVM (1998) Quantifying hand preference using a behavioural continuum. Laterality 3:255–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlson DF (1985) Development of the infants’ hand preference for visually directed reaching: preliminary report of a longitudinal study. Inf Mental Health J 6:158–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cashmore L, Uomini N, Chapelain A (2008) The evolution of handedness in humans and great apes: a review and current issues. J Anthropol Sci 86:7–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapelain A (2010) Hand preferences in bonobos (Pan paniscus) for a variety of actions: spontaneous daily actions (non-social and social), bimanual coordination (“tube task”), tool-use (“termite fishing”) and induced gestures (begging). Doctorate thesis, Loughborough University (UK)Google Scholar
  13. Chapelain A, Hogervorst E (2009) Hand preferences for bimanual coordination in 29 bonobos (Pan paniscus). Behav Brain Res 196:15–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chapelain A, Bec P, Blois-Heulin C (2006) Manual laterality in Campbell’s monkeys (Cercopithecus c. campbelli) in spontaneous and experimental actions. Behav Brain Res 173:237–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Connolly KJ, Bishop DVM (1992) The measurement of handedness: a cross-cultural comparison of samples from England and Papua New Guinea. Neuropsychologia 30:13–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coren S, Porac C (1977) Fifty centuries of right-handedness: the historical record. Science 198:631–632PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Corp N, Byrne RW (2004) Sex difference in chimpanzee handedness. Am J Phys Anthropol 123:62–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cronholm JM, Grodsky M, Behar I (1963) Situational factors in the lateral preference in rhesus monkeys. J Genet Psychol 103:167–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dahmen R, Fagard J (2005) The effect of explicit cultural bias on lateral preferences in Tunisia. Cortex 41:805–815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Danjou MC (1972) Contribution à l’étude du comportement sexuel de Cercocebus albigena. Influence des facteurs individuels et sociaux. Doctorate thesis, Université de Rennes (France)Google Scholar
  21. Doyen AL, Dufour T, Caroff X, Cherfouh A, Carlier M (2008) Hand preference and hand performance: cross-sectional developmental trends and family resemblance in degree of laterality. Laterality 13:179–197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fagard J (1998) Changes in grasping skills and the emergence of bimanual coordination during the first year of life. In: Connolly KJ (ed) The psychology of the hand. Mac Keith Press, London, pp 123–143Google Scholar
  23. Fagard J (2004) Droitiers/Gauchers. Des asymétries dans tous les sens, Solal, MarseilleGoogle Scholar
  24. Fagot J, Vauclair J (1991) Manual laterality in non-human primates: a distinction between handedness and manual specialization. Psychol Bull 109:76–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fagot J, Drea CM, Wallen K (1991) Asymmetrical hand use in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in tactually and visually regulated tasks. J Comp Psychol 105:260–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Faurie C (2004) L’évolution du polymorphisme de latéralité dans les populations humaines. Doctorate thesis, Université de Montpellier (France)Google Scholar
  27. Faurie C, Raymond M (2004) Handedness frequency over more than ten thousand years. Proc R Soc Lond 271:43–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gautier-Hion A, Colyn M, Gautier JP (1999) Histoire Naturelle des Primates d’Afrique Centrale. Libreville Multipress Gabon, LibrevilleGoogle Scholar
  29. Hopkins WD (1993) Posture and reaching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 107:162–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hopkins WD (1994) Hand preferences for bimanual feeding in 140 captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): rearing and ontogenetic determinants. Dev Psychobiol 27:395–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hopkins WD (2006) Comparative and familial analysis of handedness in great apes. Psychol Bull 132:538–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hopkins WD, Cantalupo C (2005) Individual and setting differences in the hand preferences of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): a critical analysis and some alternative explanations. Laterality 10:65–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hopkins WD, Russell JL, Cantalupo C, Freeman H (2005a) Factors influencing the prevalence and handedness for throwing in captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 119:363–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hopkins WD, Russell J, Freeman H, Buehler N, Reynolds E, Schapiro SJ (2005b) The distribution and development of handedness for manual gestures in captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Psychol Sci 16:487–493PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hunkeler C, Bourliere F, Bertrand M (1972) Le comportement social chez la Mone de Lowe (Cercopithecus campbelli lowei). Folia Primatol 17:218–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jacquet AY, Esseily R, Rider D, Fagard J (2012) Handedness for grasping objects and declarative pointing: a longitudinal study. Dev Psychobiol 54:36–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laurence A, Wallez C, Blois-Heulin C (2011) Task complexity, posture, age, sex: which is the main factor influencing manual laterality in captive Cercocebus torquatus torquatus? Laterality 4:1–21Google Scholar
  38. Leconte P, Fagard J (2004) Influence of object spatial location and task complexity on children’s use of their preferred hand depending on their handedness consistency. Dev Psychobiol 45:51–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lehman RAW (1970) Hand preference and cerebral predominance in 24 rhesus monkeys. J Neurol Sci 10:185–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lehman RAW (1978) The handedness of rhesus monkeys- I. Neuropsychologia 16:33–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lehman RAW (1980) Distribution and changes in strength of hand preference of cynomolgus monkeys. Brain Behav Evol 17:209–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Llaurens M, Mosquera M, Fabré M (2009) Manual laterality for simple reaching and bimanual coordinated task in naturalistic housed Pan troglodytes. Int J Primatol 30:183–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marchant LF, McGrew WC (1991) Laterality of function in apes: a meta-analysis of methods. J Hum Evol 21:425–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marchant LF, McGrew WC (1998) Human handedness: an ethological perspective. Hum Evol 13:221–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marchant LF, McGrew WC (2007) Ant fishing by wild chimpanzees is not lateralised. Primates 48:22–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marchant LF, Steklis HD (1986) Hand preference in a captive island group of chimpanzees. Am J Primatol 10:301–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marchant LF, McGrew WC, Eibl-Eibesfeldt I (1995) Is human handedness universal? Ethological analyses from three traditional cultures. Ethology 101:239–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McGrew WC, Marchant LF (1996) On which side of the apes? Ethological study of hand use. In: McGrew WC, Marchant LF (eds) Great ape societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 255–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McGrew WC, Marchant LF (1997) On the other hand: current issues in and meta-analysis of the behavioral laterality of hand function in non-human primates. Yearb Phys Anthropol 40:201–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McManus C (2002) Right hand, left hand. The origins of asymmetry in brains, bodies, atoms and cultures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USAGoogle Scholar
  51. McNeilage PF (1993) Implications of primate functional asymmetries for the evolution of cerebral hemispheric specialisations. In: Ward JP, Hopkins WD (eds) Primate laterality: current behavioural evidence of primate asymmetries. Springer, New York, pp 319–341Google Scholar
  52. McNeilage PF, Studdert-Kennedy MG, Lindblom B (1987) Primate handedness reconsidered. Behav Brain Sci 10:247–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Meguerditchian A, Vauclair J, Hopkins WD (2010) Captive chimpanzees use their right hand to communicate with each other: implications for the origin of the cerebral substrate for language. Cortex 46:40–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Meguerditchian A, Molesti S, Vauclair J (2011) Right-handedness predominance in 162 baboons for gestural communication: consistency across time and groups. Behav Neurosci 125:653–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Meunier H, Blois-Heulin C, Vauclair J (2011) A new tool for measuring hand preference in non-human primates: adaptation of Bishop’s Quantifying Hand Preference task for Olive baboons. Behav Brain Res 218:1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Oates JF (1988) The distribution of Cercopithecus monkeys in West African forests. In: Gautier-Hion A, Bourlière F, Gautier JP, Kingdon J (eds) A Primate radiation, evolutionary biology of the African guenons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 79–103Google Scholar
  57. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Olson DA, Ellis JE, Nadler RD (1990) Hand preferences in captive gorillas, orang-utans and gibbons. Am J Primatol 20:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Palmer AR (2002) Chimpanzee right-handedness reconsidered: evaluating the evidence with funnel plots. Am J Phys Anthropol 118:191–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Papademetriou E, Sheu CF, Michel GF (2005) A meta-analysis of primate hand preferences, particularly for reaching. J Comp Psychol 119:33–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Raczkowski D, Kalat JW, Nebes R (1974) Reliability and validity of some handedness questionnaire items. Neuropsychologia 12:43–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Raymond M, Pontier D (2004) Is there geographical variation in human handedness? Laterality 9:35–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. McGraw-Hill, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  64. Tapley SM, Bryden MP (1985) A group test for the assessment of performance between the hands. Neuropsychologia 23:215–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Uomini N (2009) The prehistory of handedness: archaeological data and comparative ethology. J Hum Evol 57:411–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vauclair J, Fagot J (1987) Spontaneous hand usage and handedness in a troop of baboons. Cortex 23:265–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Vuoksimaa E, Koskenvuo M, Rose RJ, Kaprio J (2009) Origins of handedness: a nationwide study of 30161 adults. Neuropsychologia 47:1294–1301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Warren JM (1980) Handedness and laterality in humans and other animals. Physiological psychology 8:351–359Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amandine Chapelain
    • 1
    Email author
  • Agathe Laurence
    • 1
  • Marie Vimond
    • 1
  • Audrey Maille
    • 1
  • Hélène Meunier
    • 2
  • Jacqueline Fagard
    • 3
  • Jacques Vauclair
    • 4
  • Catherine Blois-Heulin
    • 1
  1. 1.ETHOS, Université de Rennes 1, CNRS UMR 6552PaimpontFrance
  2. 2.Centre de Primatologie, Université de StrasbourgNiederhausbergenFrance
  3. 3.Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, CNRS UMR 8158, Université Paris Descartes, Centre Biomédical des Saints PèresParis cedex 06France
  4. 4.Research Center in the Psychology of Cognition, Language and Emotion, Université de ProvenceAix-en-Provence Cedex 1France

Personalised recommendations