Tool use is of great interest for cognitive research, largely because it can be particularly revealing about the underlying information processing mechanisms. Tool use that is inflexible or requires extensive experience to change, and that is only addressed towards specific targets such as food, is not likely to reflect unusual or particularly complex cognition. On the contrary, if tools are employed flexibly and for a variety of innovative purposes, then conventional combinations of inherited predispositions and associative learning are challenged and interesting questions emerge. Since New Caledonian crows (Corvus moneduloides) are especially adept at using and making tools for food extraction, we decided to examine their ability to generalise this to other contexts. We recorded how five pairs of New Caledonian crows interacted with novel objects that were not associated with food. We observed eight occasions in which the first contact with the novel object was mediated by a tool, suggesting that the function of the tool was for exploration. This is the first report of non-foraging tool use in New Caledonian crows, and it implies that the cognitive operations controlling tool-oriented behaviour in this species are more general than previously thought.
New Caledonian crows Tool use Object exploration Information gathering
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This work was funded by a BBSRC studentship (to JHW), a BBSRC grant (BB/C517392/1 to AK) and a Brasenose College Junior Research Fellowship (to AASW). We thank D. Wilson for technical support and C. Rutz for helpful discussions.
Heinrich B (1995) Neophilia and exploration in juvenile common ravens, Corvus-Corax. Anim Behav 50:695–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohmann G, Fruth B (2003) Culture in Bonobos? Between-species and within-species variation in behavior. Curr Anthropol 44:563–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt GR (1996) Manufacture and use of hook-tools by New Caledonian crows. Nature 379:249–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iriki A, Tanaka M, Iwamura Y (1996) Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport 7:2325–2330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenward B, Rutz C, Weir AAS, Kacelnik A (2006) Development of tool use in New Caledonian crows: inherited action patterns and social influences. Anim Behav 72:1329–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magurran AE (1986) Predator inspection behaviour in minnow shoals: differences between populations and individuals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker ST, Gibson KR (1977) Object manipulation, tool use and sensorimotor intelligence as feeding adaptations in Cebus monkeys and great apes. J Hum Evol 6:623–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povinelli DJ, Reaux JE, Frey SH (2010) Chimpanzees’ context-dependent tool use provides evidence for separable representations of hand and tool even during active use within peripersonal space. Neuropsychologia 48:243–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rjiksen HD (1978) A field study on Sumatran orang utans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii Lesson 1827): ecology, behaviour and conservation. Ph.D. thesis, University of WageningenGoogle Scholar
van Schaik CP, Ancrenaz M, Borgen G, Galdikas B, Knott CD, Singleton I, Suzuki A, Utami SS, Merrill M (2003) Orangutan cultures and the evolution of material culture. Science 299:102–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitale AF, Visalberghi E, Delillo C (1991) Responses to a snake model in captive crab-eating macaques (Macaca-Fascicularis) and captive tufted capuchins (Cebus-Apella). Int J Primatol 12:277–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiten A, Goodall J, McGrew WC, Nishida T, Reynolds V, Sugiyama Y, Tutin CE, Wrangham RW, Boesch C (1999) Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature 399:682–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood GA (1984) Tool use by the palm cockatoo Probosciger aterrimus during display. Corella 8:94–95Google Scholar