Stereotyping starlings are more ‘pessimistic’
- 637 Downloads
Negative affect in humans and animals is known to cause individuals to interpret ambiguous stimuli pessimistically, a phenomenon termed ‘cognitive bias’. Here, we used captive European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) to test the hypothesis that a reduction in environmental conditions, from enriched to non-enriched cages, would engender negative affect, and hence ‘pessimistic’ biases. We also explored whether individual differences in stereotypic behaviour (repetitive somersaulting) predicted ‘pessimism’. Eight birds were trained on a novel conditional discrimination task with differential rewards, in which background shade (light or dark) determined which of two covered dishes contained a food reward. The reward was small when the background was light, but large when the background was dark. We then presented background shades intermediate between those trained to assess the birds’ bias to choose the dish associated with the smaller food reward (a ‘pessimistic’ judgement) when the discriminative stimulus was ambiguous. Contrary to predictions, changes in the level of cage enrichment had no effect on ‘pessimism’. However, changes in the latency to choose and probability of expressing a choice suggested that birds learnt rapidly that trials with ambiguous stimuli were unreinforced. Individual differences in performance of stereotypies did predict ‘pessimism’. Specifically, birds that somersaulted were more likely to choose the dish associated with the smaller food reward in the presence of the most ambiguous discriminative stimulus. We propose that somersaulting is part of a wider suite of behavioural traits indicative of a stress response to captive conditions that is symptomatic of a negative affective state.
KeywordsSturnus vulgaris European starling Stereotypic behaviour Cognitive bias Environmental enrichment Anxiety
We thank Michelle Waddle for technical help. We thank Jim Clapp, Domhnall Jennings, Stephanie Matheson, Mike Mendl, Jeroen Minderman, Liz Paul and several anonymous referees for help and advice. This work was supported by two grants awarded to MB from the UK’s Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/E012000/1 and BB/05623/1).
- Asher L (2007) Welfare of captive European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Ph.D. Thesis. Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon TyneGoogle Scholar
- Bateson M, Matheson SM (2007) Performance on a categorisation task suggests that removal of environmental enrichment induces ‘pessimism’ in captive European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Anim Welfare 16:33–36Google Scholar
- Blumstein DT, Evans CS, Daniel JC (2000) J Watcher 0.9. An introductory user’s guideGoogle Scholar
- Enkel T, Gholizadeh D, von Bohlen Und Halbach O, Sanchis-Segura C, Hurlemann R, Spanagel R, Gass P, Vollmayr B (2009) Ambiguous-cue interpretation is biased under stress- and depression-like states in rats. Neuropsychopharmacol. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.204
- Flaherty CF (1996) Incentive relativity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Mason GJ, Latham NR (2004) Can’t stop, won’t stop: is stereotypy a reliable animal welfare indicator? Anim Welfare 13:S57–S69Google Scholar
- Matheson SM (2007) Using cognitive bias to assess welfare in captive European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). M.Sc. Thesis. Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon TyneGoogle Scholar
- Williams JMG, Watts FN, MacLeod C, Matthews A (1997) Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar