Animal Cognition

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 679–688

Facial perception of conspecifics: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) preferentially attend to proper orientation and open eyes

  • Satoshi Hirata
  • Koki Fuwa
  • Keiko Sugama
  • Kiyo Kusunoki
  • Shin Fujita
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper reports on the use of an eye-tracking technique to examine how chimpanzees look at facial photographs of conspecifics. Six chimpanzees viewed a sequence of pictures presented on a monitor while their eye movements were measured by an eye tracker. The pictures presented conspecific faces with open or closed eyes in an upright or inverted orientation in a frame. The results demonstrated that chimpanzees looked at the eyes, nose, and mouth more frequently than would be expected on the basis of random scanning of faces. More specifically, they looked at the eyes longer than they looked at the nose and mouth when photographs of upright faces with open eyes were presented, suggesting that particular attention to the eyes represents a spontaneous face-scanning strategy shared among monkeys, apes, and humans. In contrast to the results obtained for upright faces with open eyes, the viewing times for the eyes, nose, and mouth of inverted faces with open eyes did not differ from one another. The viewing times for the eyes, nose, and mouth of faces with closed eyes did not differ when faces with closed eyes were presented in either an upright or inverted orientation. These results suggest the possibility that open eyes play an important role in the configural processing of faces and that chimpanzees perceive and process open and closed eyes differently.

Keywords

Chimpanzees Configural processing Eye Inversion effect 

References

  1. Adachi I, Chou DP, Hampton RR (2009) Thatcher effect in monkeys demonstrates conservation of face perception across primates. Curr Biol 19:1270–1273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anastasi J, Rhodes MG (2005) An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults. Psychon Bull Rev 12:1043–1047PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bard K, Myowa-Yamokoshi M, Tomonaga M, Tanaka M, Costal A, Matsuzawa T (2005) Group differences in the mutual gaze of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Dev Psychol 41:616–624CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Batki A, Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Connellan J, Ahluwalia J (2000) Is there an innate gaze module? Evidence from human neonates. Inf Behav Dev 23:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruce C (1982) Face recognition by monkeys: absence of an inversion effect. Neuropsychologia 20:515–521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Collishaw SM, Hole GJ (2000) Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity. Perception 29:893–909CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dahl CD, Logothetis NK, Hoffman KL (2007) Individuation and holistic processing of faces in rhesus monkeys. Proc R Soc B 274:2069–2076CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahl CD, Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH, Logothetis NK (2009) Humans and macaques employ similar face-processing strategies. Curr Biol 19:509–513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. De Waal FBM (1982) Chimpanzee politics: power and sex among apes. Jonathan Cape, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. De Waal FBM (1989) Peacemaking among primates. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Diamond R, Carey S (1986) Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. J Exp Psychol 115:107–117Google Scholar
  12. Dittrich W (1990) Representation of faces in longtailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Ethology 85:265–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Emery NJ (2000) The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24:581–604CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Farroni T, Csibra G, Simion F, Johnson MH (2002) Eye contact detection in humans from birth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:9602–9605CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gallup GG, Nash RF, Ellison AL (1971) Tonic immobility as a reaction to predation: artificial eyes as a fear stimulus for chickens. Psychon Sci 23:79–80Google Scholar
  16. Goffaux V, Hault B, Michel C, Vuong QC, Rossion B (2005) The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces. Perception 34:77–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gómez JC (1996) Non-human primate theories of (non-human primate) minds: some issues concerning the origins of mind-reading. In: Carruthers P, Smith PK (eds) Theories of theories of mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 330–343Google Scholar
  18. Goodall J (1986) The chimpanzees of Gombe: patterns of behavior. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Gothard KM, Erickson CA, Amaral DG (2004) How do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) scan faces in a visual paired comparison task? Anim Cogn 7(1):25–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gothard KM, Brooks KN, Peterson MA (2009) Multiple perceptual strategies used by macaque monkeys for face recognition. Anim Cogn 12:155–167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Guo K, Robertson RG, Mahmoodi S, Tadmor Y, Young MP (2003) How do monkeys view faces? A study of eye movements. Exp Brain Res 150:363–374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hainline L (1978) Developmental changes in visual scanning of face and nonface patterns by infants. J Exp Child Psychol 25:90–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hampton RR (1994) Sensitivity to information specifying the line of gaze of humans in sparrows (Passer domesticus). Behaviour 130:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hare B, Call J, Agnetta B, Tomasello M (2000) Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see. Anim Behav 59:771–785CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hirata S, Fuwa K (2007) Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) learn to act with other individuals in a cooperative task. Primates 48:13–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hirata S, Morimura N, Fuwa K (in press) Intentional communication and comprehension of the partner’s role in experimental cooperative tasks. In: Lonsdorf EV, Ross SR, Matsuzawa T (eds) The mind of the chimpanzees: ecological and experimental perspectives. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones RB (1980) Reactions of male domestic chickens to two-dimensional eye-like shapes. Anim Behav 28:212–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaminski J, Call J, Tomasello M (2004) Body orientation and face orientation: two factors controlling apes’ begging behavior from humans. Anim Cogn 7:216–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kano F, Tomonaga M (2009) How chimpanzees look at pictures: a comparative eye-tracking study. Proc R Soc B 276:1949–1955CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kano F, Tomonaga M (in press) Face scanning in chimpanzees and humans: continuity and discontinuity. Anim Behav in pressGoogle Scholar
  31. Keating CF, Keating EG (1982) Visual scan patterns of rhesus monkeys viewing faces. Perception 11:211–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kobayashi H, Kohshima S (1997) Unique morphology of the human eye. Nature 6635:767–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martin-Malivel J, Fagot J (2001) Perception of pictorial human faces by baboons: effects of stimulus orientation on discrimination performance. Anim Learn Behav 29:10–20Google Scholar
  34. Maurer D, Le Grand R, Mondloch CJ (2002) The many faces of configural processing. Trends Cogn Sci 6:255–260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mondloch CJ, Le Grand R, Maurer D (2002) Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural processing. Perception 31:553–566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Myowa-Yamakoshi M, Tomonaga M, Tanaka M, Matsuzawa T (2003) Preference for human direct gaze in infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Cognition 89:B53–B64Google Scholar
  37. Nahm FKD, Perret A, Amaral DG, Albright TD (1997) How do monkeys look at faces? J Cogn Neurosci 9:611–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Parr LA, Dove T, Hopkins WD (1998) Why faces may be special: evidence of the inversion effect in chimpanzees. J Cogn Neurosci 10:615–622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Parr LA, Winslow JT, Hopkins WD (1999) Is the inversion effect in rhesus monkeys face-specific? Anim Cogn 2:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Povinelli DJ, Bering JM, Giambrone S (2000) Toward a science of other minds: escaping the argument by analogy. Cogn Sci 24:509–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Redican WK (1975) Facial expressions in nonhuman primates. In: Rosenblum LA (ed) Primate behavior, vol 4. Academic Press, New York, pp 103–194Google Scholar
  42. Scaife M (1976a) The response to eye-like shapes by birds I: The effect of context, a predator and a strange bird. Anim Behav 24:195–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scaife M (1976b) The response to eye-like shapes by birds II: the importance of staring, pairedness and shape. Anim Behav 24:200–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Senju A, Csibra G (2008) Gaze following in human infants depends on communicative signals. Curr Biol 18:668–671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Tomasello M, Call J, Hare B (2003) Chimpanzees understand psychological states—the question is which ones and to what extent. Trends Cogn Sci 7:153–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Tomonaga M (1994) How laboratory-raised Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) perceive rotated photographs of monkeys: evidence for an inversion effect in face perception. Primates 35:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tomonaga M (2007) Visual search for orientation of faces by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): face-specific upright superiority and the role of facial configural properties. Primates 48:1–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Valentine T (1988) Upside-down faces: a review of the effects of inversion on face recognition. Br J Psychol 79:471–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Weiss DJ, Kralik JD, Hauser MD (2001) Face processing in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Anim Cogn 4:191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yin RK (1969) Looking at upside down faces. J Exp Psychol 81:141–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Satoshi Hirata
    • 1
  • Koki Fuwa
    • 1
  • Keiko Sugama
    • 1
  • Kiyo Kusunoki
    • 1
  • Shin Fujita
    • 1
  1. 1.Hayashibara Biochemical Laboratories, Inc.Great Ape Research InstituteTamano, OkayamaJapan

Personalised recommendations