Animal Cognition

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 663–670 | Cite as

Donor payoffs and other-regarding preferences in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus)

Short Communication

Abstract

Helping others at no cost to oneself is a simple way to demonstrate other-regarding preferences. Yet, primates exhibit mixed results for other-regarding preferences: chimpanzees and tamarins do not show these effects, whereas capuchin monkeys and marmosets preferentially give food to others. One factor of relevance to this no-cost food donation is the payoff to the donor. Though donors always receive the same payoffs regardless of their choice, previous work varies in whether they receive either a food reward or no food reward. Here, I tested cotton-top tamarins in a preferential giving task. Subjects could choose from two tools, one of which delivered food to a partner in an adjacent cage and the other of which delivered food to an empty cage. Thus, subjects could preferentially give or withhold food from a partner. I varied whether subjects received food payoffs, whether a partner was present or absent, and whether the partner was a non-cagemate or the subject’s mate. Results showed that the subjects’ overall motivation to pull either tool declined when they did not receive any food. Additionally, they did not preferentially donate or withhold food, regardless of their own payoff or their relationship with the partner. Thus, cotton-top tamarins do not take advantage of cost-free food giving, either when they might gain in the future (mates) or when they have no opportunity for future interactions (non-cagemates).

Keywords

Altruism Callitrichid Cooperative breeding Inequity Payoff Self-interest 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am grateful for funding from the Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (National Institutes of Health). I am particularly thankful to Marc Hauser for help in designing the experiment, for providing the facilities to run the experiment, and for comments on an early version of the manuscript. I appreciate feedback from three anonymous referees. I wish to thank Walt Gardner, Justus Meyer, Nina Strohminger, Heather Trevino, and Abby Wild for assistance in testing the tamarins, and I thank the members the Cognitive Evolution Laboratory at Harvard for valuable discussions about the project. This experiment was conducted in compliance with the Harvard University Animal Care protocols 92-16 and 22-07 and the APA Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in the Care and Use of Animals.

References

  1. Bräuer J, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) Are apes really inequity averse? Proc R Soc Lond B 273:3123–3128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2003) Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425:297–299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brosnan SF, Schiff HC, de Waal FBM (2005) Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burkart JM, van Schaik C (2009) Cognitive consequences of cooperative breeding in primates? Anim Cogn 13:1–19. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0263-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Burkart JM, Fehr E, Efferson C, van Schaik CP (2007) Other-regarding preferences in a non-human primate: common marmosets provision food altruistically. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104:19762–19766CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Camerer C (2003) Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen MK, Hauser M (2005) Modeling reciprocation and cooperation in primates: evidence for a punishing strategy. J Theor Biol 235:5–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cronin KA, Schroeder KKE, Rothwell ES, Silk JB, Snowdon CT (2009) Cooperatively breeding cottontop tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) do not donate rewards to their long-term mates. J Comp Psychol 123:231–241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. de Waal FBM (2003) The chimpanzee’s service economy: evidence for cognition-based reciprocal exchange. In: Ostrom E, Walker J (eds) Trust and reciprocity: interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 128–143Google Scholar
  10. de Waal FBM, Leimgruber K, Greenberg AR (2008) Giving is self-rewarding for monkeys. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105:13685–13689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dubreuil D, Gentile SM, Visalberghi E (2006) Are capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) inequity averse? Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1223–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dugatkin LA (1997) Cooperation among animals: an evolutionary perspective. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Fehr E, Schmidt K (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ 114:817–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fehr E, Bernhard H, Rockenbach B (2008) Egalitarianism in young children. Nature 454:1079–1083CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fontenot MB, Watson SL, Roberts KA, Miller RW (2007) Effects of food preferences on token exchange and behavioural responses to inequality in tufted capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Anim Behav 74:487–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hauser MD, Chen MK, Chen F, Chuang E (2003) Give unto others: genetically unrelated cotton-top tamarin monkeys preferentially give food to those who altruistically give food back. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:2363–2370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hrdy SB (2005) Evolutionary context of human development: the cooperative breeding model. In: Carter CS, Ahnert L, Grossmann KE, Hrdy SB (eds) Attachment and bonding: a new synthesis. (vol. 92). MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 9–32Google Scholar
  18. Jensen K, Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) What’s in it for me? Self-regard precludes altruism and spite in chimpanzees. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1013–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lakshminarayanan VR, Santos LR (2008) Capuchin monkeys are sensitive to others’ welfare. Curr Biol 18:R999–R1000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Melis AP, Hare B, Tomasello M (2006a) Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators. Science 311:1297–1300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Melis AP, Hare B, Tomasello M (2006b) Engineering cooperation in chimpanzees: tolerance constraints on cooperation. Anim Behav 72:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muller MN, Mitani JC (2005) Conflict and cooperation in wild chimpanzees. Adv Stud Behav 35:275–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neiworth JJ, Johnson ET, Whillock K, Greenberg J, Brown V (2009) Is a sense of inequity an ancestral primate trait? Testing social inequity in cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). J Comp Psychol 123:10–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Roma PG, Silberberg A, Ruggiero AM, Suomi SJ (2006) Capuchin monkeys, inequity aversion, and the frustration effect. J Comp Psychol 120:67–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Silberberg A, Crescimbene L, Addessi E, Anderson J, Visalberghi E (2009) Does inequity aversion depend on a frustration effect? A test with capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Animal Cognition 12:505–509CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Silk JB, Brosnan SF, Vonk J, Henrich J, Povinelli DJ, Richardson AS, Lambeth S, Susan A, Mascaro J, Shapiro S (2005) Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members. Nature 437:1357–1359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Stevens JR, Stephens DW (2004) The economic basis of cooperation: trade-offs between selfishness and generosity. Behav Ecol 15:255–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Takimoto A, Kuroshima H, Fujita K (2009) Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) are sensitive to others’ reward: an experimental analysis of food-choice for conspecifics. Animal Cognition. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0248-6
  29. van Wolkenten M, Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2007) Inequity responses of monkeys modified by effort. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104:18854–18859CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of games and economic behavior, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  31. Vonk J, Brosnan SF, Silk JB, Henrich J, Richardson AS, Lambeth SP, Henrich J, Shapiro S, Richardson A, Lambeth S, Povinelli DJ (2008) Chimpanzees do not take advantage of very low cost opportunities to deliver food to unrelated group members. Anim Behav 75:1757–1770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Warneken F, Tomasello M (2006) Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science 311:1301–1303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Warneken F, Hare B, Melis AP, Hanus D, Tomasello M (2007) Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children. PLoS Biol 5:e184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Yamamoto S, Tanaka M (2009) How did altruism and reciprocity evolve in humans? Interact Stud 10:150–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Adaptive Behavior and CognitionMax Planck Institute for Human DevelopmentBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations