Animal Cognition

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 507–513

A new method for studying problem solving and tool use in stingrays (Potamotrygon castexi)

  • Michael J. Kuba
  • Ruth A. Byrne
  • Gordon M. Burghardt
Original Paper

Abstract

Testing the cognitive abilities of cartilaginous fishes is important in understanding the evolutionary origins of cognitive functions in higher vertebrates. We used five South American fresh water stingrays (Potamotrygon castexi) in a learning and problem-solving task. A tube test apparatus was developed to provide a simple but sophisticated procedure for testing cognitive abilities of aquatic animals. All five subjects quickly learned to use water as a tool to extract food from the testing apparatus. The experimental protocol, which gave the animals the opportunity of correcting a wrong visual cue decision, resulted in four out of five subjects correcting an error rather than making an initial right choice. One of five subjects reached 100% correct trials in the visual discrimination task. The ability to use water as an agent to extract food from the testing apparatus is a first indication of tool use in batoid fishes. Performance in the instrumental task of retrieving food from a novel testing apparatus and the rapid learning in the subsequent discrimination/error correction task shows that cartilaginous fish can be used to study the origins of cognitive functions in the vertebrate lineage.

Keywords

Tool use Problem solving Cognition Learning Fish Stingray Potamotrygon castexi 

Supplementary material

10071_2009_301_MOESM1_ESM.divx.
Supplementary material 1 (DIVX 2136 kb). Animal 2 choosing the correct side of the tasting apparatus. The correct side to extract the food is marked by white tape

References

  1. Agrillo C, Dadda M, Bisazza A (2007) Quantity discrimination in female mosquito fish. Anim Cogn 10:63–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrillo C, Dadda M, Serena G, Bisazza A (2008) Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquito fish. Anim Cogn 11:495–503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrew RJ (2002) The earliest origins and subsequent evolution of lateralization. In: Rogers LJ, Andrews R (eds) Comparative vertebrate lateralization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 70–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aronson LR, Aronson FR, Clark E (1967) Instrumental conditioning and light- dark discrimination in young nurse sharks. Bull Mar Sci 17:249–256Google Scholar
  5. Beck BB (1980) Animal tool use. Garland STPM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergen Y, Laland KN, Hoppit W (2004) Social learing, innovation, and intelligence in fish. In: Rogers LJ, Kaplan G (eds) Comparative vertebrate cognition: are primates superior to non-primates? Kluwer Academic, Plenum, pp 141–168Google Scholar
  7. Bisazza A, Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G (1998) The origins of cerebral asymmetry: a review of evidence of behavioural and brain lateralization in fishes, reptiles and amphibians. Neuro Behav Rev 22:411–426Google Scholar
  8. Bitterman ME (1965) Phyletic differences in learning. Am Psychol 20:396–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bitterman ME, Mackintosh NJ (1969) Reversal and probability learning: comments. In: Gilbert RM, Sutherland NS (eds) Animal discrimination learning. Academic Press, London, pp 163–185Google Scholar
  10. Brown C, Laland KN (2003) Social learning in fishes: a review. Fish Fish 4:280–288Google Scholar
  11. Brown C, Laland K, Krause J (2006) Fish cognition and behavior. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Bshary R, Wickler W, Fricke H (2002) Fish cognition: a primate’s eye view. Anim Cogn 5:1–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bshary R, Grutter AS, Willener AST, Leimar O (2008) Pairs of cooperating cleaner fish provide better service quality than singletons. Nature 455:965–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burghardt GM (1977) Learning processes in reptiles. In: Gans C, Tinkle D (eds) The biology of the reptilia, vol 7. Academic Press, New York, pp 555–681Google Scholar
  15. Burghardt GM (2005) The genesis of animal play: testing the limits. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Butler AB, Hodos W (2005) Comparative vertebrate neuroanatomy: evolution and adaptation. Wiley-Liss, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carrier JC, Musick JA, Heithaus MR (2004) Biology of sharks and their relatives. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark E (1959) Instrumental conditioning in lemon sharks. Science 130:217–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Collin SP, Whitehead D (2004) The functional roles of passive electroreception in non-electric fishes. Anim Biol 54:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fellows BJ (1967) Chance stimulus sequences for discrimination tasks. Psychol Bull 67:87–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gleitman H, Rozin P (1971) Learning and memory. In: Hoar WS, Randall DJ (eds) Fish physiology, vol 6. Academic Press, New York, pp 191–278Google Scholar
  22. Graeber RC (1978) Behavioral studies correlated with central nervous system integration of vision in sharks. In: Hodgson ES, Mathewson RF (eds) Sensory biology of sharks, skates and rays. Office of Naval Research, Arlington, pp 195–225Google Scholar
  23. Grogan ED, Lund R (2004) The origin and relationships of early chondrichthyes. In: Carrier JC, Musick JA, Heithaus MR (eds) Biology of sharks and their relatives. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamlett WC (2005) Reproductive biology and phylogeny of Chondrichthyes: sharks, batoids, and chimaeras. Science Publishers Inc, EnfieldGoogle Scholar
  25. Hodgson ES, Mathewson RF (1978) Sensory biology of sharks, skates and rays. Office of Naval Research, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  26. Horner V, Whiten A (2007) Learning from others’ mistakes? Limits on understanding a trap- tube task by young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 121:12–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hueter RE, Mann DA, Maruska KP, Sisneros JA, Demski LS (2004) Sensory biology of elasmobranchs. In: Carrier JC, Musick JA, Heithaus MR (eds) Biology of sharks and their relatives. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  28. Jerison HJ (1970) Gross brain indices and the analysis of fossil endocasts. In: Noback CR, Montagna W (eds) Advances in primatology, vol 1. Appleton-Century Crofts, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Jerison HJ (1973) Evolution of the brain and intelligence. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Keifer JD, Colgan PW (1992) The role of learning in fish behavior. Rev Fish Biol Fish 2:125–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Klimley PA (2003) The secret life of sharks: a leading marine biologist reveals the mysteries of shark behavior. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Laland KN, Brown C, Krause J (2003) Learning in fishes: from three-seconds memory to culture. Fish Fish 4:192–202Google Scholar
  33. Mackintosh NJ (1969) Comparative studies of reversal and probability learning: rats, birds and fish. In: Gilbert RM, Sutherland NS (eds) Animal discrimination learning. Academic Press, London, pp 137–162Google Scholar
  34. Malashichev YB (2006) One-sided limb preference is linked to alternating-limb locomotion in anuran amphibians. J Comp Psychol 120:401–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. New JG (2001) Comparative neurobiology of the elasmobranch cerebellum: theme and variation on a sensorimotor interface. Environ Biol Fish 60:93–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Northcutt RG (1977) Elasmobranch central nervous system organization and its possible evolutionary significance. Am J Zool 17:411–429Google Scholar
  37. Northcutt R (1978) Brain organization in the cartilaginous fishes. In: Hodgson ES, Mathewson RF (eds) Sensory biology of sharks, skates and rays. Office of Naval Research, Arlington, pp 117–193Google Scholar
  38. Northcutt RG (1989) Brain variation and phylogenetic trends in elasmobranch fishes. J Exp Zool 2:83–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reaux R, Povinelli DJ (2000) The trap-tube problem. In: Povinelli DJ (ed) Folk physics for apes: a chimpanzee’s theory of how the world works. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 108–131Google Scholar
  40. Rodrriguez F (2006) Neural mechanisms of learning in teleost fish. In: Brown C, Laland K, Krause J (eds) Fish cognition and behavior. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 243–277Google Scholar
  41. Rogers LJ (2002) Lateralised brain function in anurans: comparison to lateralisation in other vertebrates. Laterality 7(3):219–293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rogers LJ, Andrew R (2002) Comparative vertebrate lateralization. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schluessel V, Bleckmann H (2005) Spatial memory and orientation strategies in the elasmobranch Potamotrygon motoro. J Comp Physiol A 191:695–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schuster S, Rossel S, Schmidtmann A, Jäger I, Poralla J (2004) Archer fish learn to compensate for complex optical distortions to determine the absolute size of their aerial prey. Curr Biol 14:1565–1568CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Thorpe WH (1963) Learning and instinct in animals. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Visalberghi E, Limongelli L (1994) Lack of Comprehension of cause-effect relationships in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J Comp Psychol 108:15–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Visalberghi E, Fragaszy DM, Savage-Rumbaugh S (1995) Comprehension of causal relations in a tool-using task by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus), orang utans (Pongo pygmaeus), and capuchins (Cebus apella). J Comp Psychol 109:52–60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wodinsky J, Bitterman ME (1957) Discrimination-reversal in the fish. Am J Psychol 70:569–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Yarom Y, Cohen D (2002) The olivocerebellar system as a generator of temporal patterns. Ann N Y Acad Sci 978:122–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Yerkes RM (1943) Chimpanzees: a laboratory colony. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Kuba
    • 1
  • Ruth A. Byrne
    • 2
  • Gordon M. Burghardt
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Life Sciences, Department of Neurobiology and Interdisciplinary Center for Neural ComputationThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Abteilung für Rheumatologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin IIIMedizinische Universität WienViennaAustria
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations