Animal Cognition

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 367–376 | Cite as

Dingoes (Canis dingo) can use human social cues to locate hidden food

Original Paper

Abstract

There is contention concerning the role that domestication plays in the responsiveness of canids to human social cues, with most studies investigating abilities of recognized domestic dog breeds or wolves. Valuable insight regarding the evolution of social communication with humans might be gained by investigating Australian dingoes, which have an early history of domestication, but have been free-ranging in Australia for approximately 3500–5000 years. Seven ‘pure’ dingoes were tested outdoors by a familiar experimenter using the object-choice paradigm to determine whether they could follow nine human communicative gestures previously tested with domestic dogs and captive wolves. Dingoes passed all cues significantly above control, including the “benchmark” momentary distal pointing, with the exception of gaze only, gaze and point, and pointing from the incorrect location. Dingo performance appears to lie somewhere between wolves and dogs, which suggests that domestication may have played a role in their ability to comprehend human gestures.

Keywords

Dingo Dog Human pointing Object-choice task Social cognition Domestication 

References

  1. Agnetta B, Hare B, Tomasello M (2000) Cues to food location that domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) of different ages do and do not use. Anim Cogn 3:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boitani L, Ciucci P (1995) Comparative social ecology of feral dogs and wolves. Ethol Ecol Evol 7:49–72Google Scholar
  3. Bräuer J, Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) Making inferences about the location of hidden food: social dog, causal ape. J Comp Psychol 120:38–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Call J, Bräuer J, Kaminski J, Tomasello M (2003) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. J Comp Psychol 117:257–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Clutton-Brock J (1995) Origins of the early dog: domestication and early history. In: Serpell J (ed) The domestic dog: its evolution, behavior and interactions with people. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 7–20Google Scholar
  6. Cooper J, Ashton C, Bishop S, West R, Mills D, Young R (2003) Clever hounds: social cognition in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Appl Anim Behav Sci 81:229–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corbett L (1985) Morphological comparisons of Australian and Thai dingoes: a reappraisal of dingo status, distribution and ancestry. Proc Ecol Soc Aust 13:277–291Google Scholar
  8. Corbett L (1995) The Dingo in Australia and Asia. University of New South Wales Press, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  9. Fentress J (1967) Observations on the behavioral development of a hand-reared male timber wolf. Am Zool 7:339–351Google Scholar
  10. Field A (2005) Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Frank H, Frank M (1982) On the effects of domestication on canine social development and behaviour. Appl Anim Ethol 8:507–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gácsi M, Miklósi A, Varga O, Topál J, Csányi V (2004) Are readers of our face readers of our minds? Dogs (Canis familiaris) show situation-dependent recognition of human’s attention. Anim Cogn 7:144–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gácsi M, Gyóri B, Miklósi A, Virányi Z, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Csányi V (2005) Species-specific differences and similarities in the behavior of hand-raised dog and wolf pups in social situations with humans. Dev Psychobiol 47:111–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gácsi M, Philip J, Miklósi A (2009) Which way does domestication work: creating new traits or modifying timing? J Vet Beh 4:58Google Scholar
  15. Gollan K (1984) The Australian Dingo: in the shadow of man. In: Archer M, Clayton G (eds) Vertebrate zoogeography and evolution in Australasia: animals in space and time. Hesperian Press, Perth, Australia, pp 921–927Google Scholar
  16. Hare B, Tomasello M (1999) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human and conspecific social cues to locate hidden food. J Comp Psychol 113:173–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hare B, Tomasello M (2005) Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends Cogn Sci 9:439–444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M (1998) Communication of food location between human and dog (Canis familiaris). Evol Comm 2:137–159Google Scholar
  19. Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1634–1636CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hare B, Plyusnina I, Ignacio N, Schepina O, Stepika A, Wrangham R, Trut L (2005) Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication. Curr Biol 15:226–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones R (1970) Tasmanian aborigines and dogs. Mankind 7:256–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koler-Matznick J, Brisbin I, Feinstein M, Bulmer S (2003) An updated description of the New Guinea singing dog (Canis hallstromi, Troughton 1957). J Zool (Lond) 261:109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kruska D (2005) On the evolutionary significance of encephalization in some eutherian mammals: effects of adaptive radiation, domestication, and feralization. Brain Behav Evol 65:73–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lumholtz C (1980) Among cannibals. Australian National University Press, Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  25. Macintosh N (1975) The origin of the dingo: an enigma. In: Fox M (ed) The wild canids: their systematics, behavioural ecology and evolution. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, pp 87–106Google Scholar
  26. McKinley J, Sambrook T (2000) Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 3:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miklósi A, Soproni K (2006) A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Anim Cogn 9:81–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Miklósi A, Polgárdi R, Topál J, Csányi V (1998) Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs. Anim Cogn 1:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Gácsi M, Virányi Z, Csányi V (2003) A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. Curr Biol 13:763–766CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Miklósi A, Topál J, Csányi V (2004) Comparative social cognition: what can dogs teach us? Anim Behav 67:995–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miklósi A, Pongrácz P, Lakatos G, Topál J, Csányi V (2005) A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans and cats (Felis catus) and humans. J Comp Psychol 119:179–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Milham P, Thompson P (1976) Relative antiquity of human occupation and extinct fauna at Madura cave, southeastern Western Australia. Mankind 10:175–180Google Scholar
  33. Price EO (1984) Behavioral aspects of animal domestication. Q Rev Biol 59:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reid PJ (2009) Adapting to the human world: dog’s responsiveness to our social cues. Behav Proc 80:325–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Riedel J, Buttelmann D, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use a physical marker to locate hidden food. Anim Cogn 9:27–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Riedel J, Schumann K, Kaminski J, Call J, Tomasello M (2008) The early ontogeny of human–dog communication. Anim Behav 75:1003–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rooney N, Bradshaw J, Robinson I (2001) Do dogs respond to play signals given by humans? Anim Behav 61:715–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Savolainen P, Zhang Y, Luo J, Lundeberg J, Leitner T (2002) Genetic evidence for an east Asian origin of domestic dogs. Science 298:1610–1613CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Savolainen P, Leitner T, Wilton A, Matisoo-Smith E, Lundeberg J (2004) A detailed picture of the origin of the Australian dingo, obtained from the study of mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:12387–12390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Schwab C, Huber L (2006) Obey or not obey? Dogs (Canis familiaris) behave differently in response to attentional states of their owners. J Comp Psychol 120:169–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith B, Litchfield C (2009) Review of the relationship between Indigenous Australians, dingoes (Canis dingo), and domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Anthrozoös 22:111–128Google Scholar
  42. Soproni K, Miklósi A, Topál J, Csányi V (2001) Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 115:122–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Soproni K, Miklósi A, Topál J, Csányi V (2002) Dogs’ (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. J Comp Psychol 116:27–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Udell M, Dorey N, Wynne C (2008) Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues. Anim Behav 76:1767–1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vas J, Topál J, Gácsi M, Miklósi Á, Csányi V (2005) A friend or an enemy? Dogs’ reaction to an unfamiliar person showing behavioural cues of threat and friendliness at different times. Appl Anim Behav Sci 94:99–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vilà C, Savolainen P, Maldonado J, Amorin I, Rice J, Honeycutt R, Crandall K, Lundeberg J, Wayne R (1997) Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. Science 276:1687–1689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Virányi Z, Gácsi M, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Belényi B, Ujfalussy D, Miklósi A (2008) Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn 11:373–387CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilton A (2001) DNA methods of assessing dingo purity. In: Dickman C, Lunney D (eds) A symposium on the dingo. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, NSW, pp 49–56Google Scholar
  49. Wobber V (2005) The evolution of cooperative signal comprehension in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Unpublished Honours Dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  50. Woolpy J, Ginsburg B (1967) Wolf socialization: a study of temperament in a wild social species. Am Zool 7:357–363Google Scholar
  51. Wynne C, Udell M, Lord K (2008) Ontogeny’s impacts on human–dog communication. Anim Behav 76:e1–e4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zimen E (1987) Ontogeny of approach and flight behavior towards humans in wolves, poodles and wolf- poodle hybrids. In: Frank H (ed) Man and Wolf. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 275–292Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of South AustraliaMagillAustralia

Personalised recommendations