Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: generality across spatial configurations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatial pattern learning permits the learning of the location of objects in space relative to each other without reference to discrete visual landmarks or environmental geometry. In the present experiment, we investigated conditions that facilitate spatial pattern learning. Specifically, human participants searched in a real environment or interactive 3-D computer-generated virtual environment open-field search task for four hidden goal locations arranged in a diamond configuration located in a 5 × 5 matrix of raised bins. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Pattern Only, Landmark + Pattern, or Cues + Pattern. All participants experienced a Training phase followed by a Testing phase. Visual cues were coincident with the goal locations during Training only in the Cues + Pattern group whereas a single visual cue at a non-goal location maintained a consistent spatial relationship with the goal locations during Training only in the Landmark + Pattern group. All groups were then tested in the absence of visual cues. Results in both environments indicated that participants in all three groups learned the spatial configuration of goal locations. The presence of the visual cues during Training facilitated acquisition of the task for the Landmark + Pattern and Cues + Pattern groups compared to the Pattern Only group. During Testing the Landmark + Pattern and Cues + Pattern groups did not differ when their respective visual cues were removed. Furthermore, during Testing the performance of these two groups was superior to the Pattern Only group. Results generalize prior research to a different configuration of spatial locations, isolate spatial pattern learning as the process facilitated by visual cues, and indicate that the facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues does not require coincident visual cues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biegler R, Morris RGM (1993) Landmark stability is a prerequisite for spatial but not discrimination learning. Nature 361:631–633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biegler R, Morris RGM (1996) Landmark stability: further studies pointing to a role in spatial learning. Q J Exp Psychol 49B:307–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown MF (2006a) Abstracting spatial relations among goal locations. In: Brown MF, Cook RG (eds) Animal spatial cognition: comparative, neural, and computational approaches. http://www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/asc/brown/

  • Brown MF (2006b) Spatial patterns: behavioral control and cognitive representation. In: Wasserman EA, Zentall TR (eds) Comparative cognition: experimental explorations of animal intelligence. Oxford, New York, pp 425–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown MF, Terrinoni M (1996) Control of choice by the spatial configuration of goals. J Exp Psychol Anim B 22:438–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MF, Wintersteen (2004) Spatial patterns and memory for locations. Learn Behav 34:391–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown MF, DiGello E, Milewski M, Wilson M, Kozak M (2000) Spatial pattern learning in rats: conditional control by two patterns. Anim Learn Behav 28:278–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown MF, Zeiler C, John A (2001) Spatial pattern learning in rats: control by an iterative pattern. J Exp Psychol Anim B 27:407–416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MF, Yang SY, DiGian KA (2002) No evidence for overshadowing or facilitation of spatial pattern learning by visual cues. Anim Learn Behav 30:363–375

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess N (2006) Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends Cogn Sci 10:551–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chamizo VD (2003) Acquisition of knowledge about spatial location: assessing the generality of the mechanism of learning. Q J Exp Psychol 56B:102–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K (1986) A purely geometric module in the rat’s spatial representation. Cognition 23:149–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K (2008) Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module. Trends Cogn Sci 12:355–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K, Newcombe NS (2005) Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence. Psychon B Rev 12:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K, Newcombe NS (2006) Geometry, features, and orientation in vertebrate animals: a pictorial review. In: Brown MF, Cook RG (eds) Animal spatial cognition: comparative, neural, and computational approaches. http://www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/asc/cheng/

  • Cheng K, Shettleworth SJ, Huttenlocher J, Rieser JJ (2007) Bayesian integration of spatial information. Psychol Bull 133:625–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DiGello E, Brown MF, Affuso J (2002) Negative information: both presence and absence of spatial pattern elements guide rats’ spatial choices. Psychon B Rev 9:706–713

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeller CF, Burgess N (2008) Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning location relative to landmarks and boundaries. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:5909–5914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doeller CF, King JA, Burgess N (2008) Parallel striatal and hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:5915–5920

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durlach PJ, Rescorla RA (1980) Potentiation rather than overshadowing in flavor-aversion learning: an analysis in terms of within-compound associations. J Exp Psychol Anim B 6:175–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellmore TM, McNaughton BL (2004) Human path integration by optic flow. Spat Cogn Comput 4:255–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne AS, Berlie J, Georgakopoulos J, Maurer R (1998) Role of dead reckoning in navigation. In: Healy S (ed) Spatial representation in animals. Oxford, New York, pp 54–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR (1990) The organization of learning. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham M, Good MA, McGregor A, Pearce JM (2006) Spatial learning based on the shape of the environment is influenced by properties of the objects forming the shape. J Exp Psychol Anim B 32:44–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horne MR, Pearce JM (2009) Between-cue associations influence searching for a hidden goal in an environment with a distinctive shape. J Exp Psychol Anim B 35:99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey KJ (1998) Learning of landmark stability and instability by hippocampal place cells. Neuropharmacology 37:677–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns MJ, Warren WH, Duchon AP, Tarr M (2002) Path integration from optic flow and body senses in a homing task. Perception 31:349–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly DM, Gibson BM (2007) Spatial navigation: spatial learning in real and virtual environments. Comp Cogn Behav Rev 2:111–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky RL, Loomis JM, Beall AC, Chance SS, Golledge RG (1998) Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychol Sci 9:293–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Learmonth AE, Newcombe NS, Huttenlocher J (2001) Toddlers’ use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. J Exp Child Psychol 80:225–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara TP, Valiquette CM (2004) Remembering where things are. In: Allen GL (ed) Human spatial memory: remembering where. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 3–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller NY (2009) Modeling the effects of enclosure size on geometry learning. Behav Process 80:306–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller NY, Shettleworth SJ (2007) Learning about environmental geometry: an associative model. J Exp Psychol Anim B 33:191–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montello DR, Waller D, Hegarty M, Richardson AE (2004) Spatial memory of real environments, virtual environments, and maps. In: Allen G (ed) Human spatial memory: remembering where. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 251–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Mou W, McNamara TP (2002) Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. J Exp Psychol Learn 28:162–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardini M, Jones P, Bedford R, Braddick O (2008) Development of cue integration in human navigation. Curr Biol 18:689–693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe NS, Ratliff KR (2007) Explaining the development of spatial reorientation: modularity-plus-language versus the emergence of adaptive combination. In: Plumert JM, Spencer JP (eds) The emerging spatial mind. Oxford, New York, pp 53–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Nico D, Israёl I, Berthoz A (2002) Interaction of visual and ideothetic information in a path completion task. Exp Brain Res 146:379–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce JM, Graham M, Good MA, Jones PM, McGregor A (2006) Potentiation, overshadowing, and blocking of spatial learning based on the shape of the environment. J Exp Psychol Anim B 32:201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plumert JM, Spencer JP (2007) The emerging spatial mind. Oxford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratliff KR, Newcombe NS (2008) Reorienting when cues conflict: evidence for an adaptive combination view. Psychol Sci 19:1301–1307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla RA, Durlach P (1981) Within-event learning in Pavlovian conditioning. In: Spear NE, Miller RR (eds) Information processing in animals: memory mechanisms. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 81–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson AE, Montello D, Hegarty M (1999)  Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps, and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Mem Cogn 27:741–750

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton AL, McNamara TP (2001) Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cogn Psychol 43:274–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth SJ (1998) Cognition, evolution, and behavior. Oxford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturz BR, Kelly DM (2009) Encoding of relative enclosure size in a dynamic three-dimensional virtual environment by humans. Behav Process 82:223–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturz BR, Bodily KD, Katz JS (2006) Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans. Anim Cogn 9:207–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sturz BR, Bodily KD, Katz JS, Kelly DM (2009a) Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans: generality across real and virtual environments. Anim Cogn 12:237–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sturz BR, Brown MF, Kelly DM (2009b) Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: implications for theoretical accounts of spatial learning. Psychon B Rev 16:306–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uttal DH, Chiong C (2004) Seeing space in more than one way: children’s use of higher order patterns in spatial memory and cognition. In: Allen GL (ed) Human spatial memory: remembering where. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 125–142

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was conducted following the relevant ethical guidelines for human research and was supported by an Alzheimer Society of Canada Grant to DMK. We thank Paul Cooke, Randi Dickinson, Stephanie Diemer, Roxanne Dowd, Karen Gwillim, Jenny Lee, Jason Lukich and Martha Forloines for their assistance with data collection and scoring. We would also like to thank three anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Armstrong Atlantic State University, 229 Science Center, 11935 Abercorn Street, Savannah, GA, 31419, USA

    Bradley R. Sturz

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, 9 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A5, Canada

    Debbie M. Kelly

  3. Department of Psychology, Villanova University, 800 Lancaster Ave, Villanova, PA, 19085, USA

    Michael F. Brown

Authors
  1. Bradley R. Sturz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Debbie M. Kelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael F. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley R. Sturz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sturz, B.R., Kelly, D.M. & Brown, M.F. Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: generality across spatial configurations. Anim Cogn 13, 341–349 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0283-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0283-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation