Advertisement

Animal Cognition

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 229–238 | Cite as

Visual laterality in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) interacting with humans

  • Kate Farmer
  • Konstanze Krueger
  • Richard W. Byrne
Original Paper

Abstract

Most horses have a side on which they are easier to handle and a direction they favour when working on a circle, and recent studies have suggested a correlation between emotion and visual laterality when horses observe inanimate objects. As such lateralisation could provide important clues regarding the horse’s cognitive processes, we investigated whether horses also show laterality in association with people. We gave horses the choice of entering a chute to left or right, with and without the passive, non-interactive presence of a person unknown to them. The left eye was preferred for scanning under both conditions, but significantly more so when a person was present. Traditionally, riders handle horses only from the left, so we repeated the experiment with horses specifically trained on both sides. Again, there was a consistent preference for left eye scanning in the presence of a person, whether known to the horses or not. We also examined horses interacting with a person, using both traditionally and bilaterally trained horses. Both groups showed left eye preference for viewing the person, regardless of training and test procedure. For those horses tested under both passive and interactive conditions, the left eye was preferred significantly more during interaction. We suggest that most horses prefer to use their left eye for assessment and evaluation, and that there is an emotional aspect to the choice which may be positive or negative, depending on the circumstances. We believe these results have important practical implications and that emotional laterality should be taken into account in training methods.

Keywords

Horse Laterality Eye preference Emotion Vision 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Christianne Torkelsen for her work in testing the group 1 horses. We would also like to thank all the horse owners who allowed their horses to take part in the tests, and all the helpers for their time and efforts during the testing procedures, in particular Petra Studeny, for her invaluable help in collecting data, organising the testing and taking part in the test procedures, Hal Rock for his tremendous help and support, and the many volunteers who kindly gave their time and energy to assist in this research. We also thank Knut Krueger for his help with the statistical analysis, and Birgit Flauger for her valuable suggestions and input.

References

  1. Austin NP, Rogers LJ (2007) Asymmetry of flight and escape turning responses in horses. Laterality 12(5):464–474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Basile M, Boivin S, Boutin A, Blois Beulin C, Hausberger M, Lemasson A (2009) Socially dependent auditory laterlity in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 12:611–619CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bisazza A, Rogers L, Vallortigara G (1998) The origins of cerebral asymmetry: a review of evidence of behavioural and brain lateralization in fishes, amphibians, and reptiles. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22:411–426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brannaman B (1997) Groundwork: the first impression. Rancho Deluxe Design, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  5. Cantalupo C, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (1995) Lateralisation of predator-evasion response in teleost fish (Girardinus falcatus). Neuropsychologia 32:1637–1646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapelain AS, Blois-Heulin CL (2009) Lateralization for visual processes: eye preference in Campbell’s monkeys (Cercopithecus c. campbelli). Anim Cogn 12(1):11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. De Boyer Des Roches A, Richard-Yris M-A, Henry S, Hausberger M (2008) Laterality and emotions: visual laterality in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) differs with objects’ emotional value. Physiol Behav 94(3):487–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Deng C, Rogers LJ (1997) Differential contributions of the two visual pathways to functional lateralization in chicks. Behav Brain Res 87(2):173–182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Eftimie R, de Vries G, Lewis MA (2007) Complex spatial group patterns result from different animal communication mechanisms. PNAS 104:6974–6979CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fureix C, Jego P, Sankey C, Hausberger M (2009) How horses (Equus caballus) see the world: humans as significant “objects”. Anim Cogn 12:643–654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghirlanda S, Vallortigara G (2004) The evolution of brain lateralization: a game theoretical analysis of population structure. Proc Roy Soc B 271:853–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanggi EB (1999) Interocular transfer in horses (Equus caballus). J Equine Vet Sci 19(8):518–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Humle T, Matsuzawa T (2009) Laterality in hand use across four tool-use behaviors among the wild chimpanzees of Bossou, Guinea, West Africa. Am J Primatol 70:40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krueger K (2007) Behaviour of horses in the ‘round pen technique’. Appl Anim Behav Sci 104:162–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Larose C, Richard-Yris M-A, Hausberger M (2006) Laterality of horses associated with emotionality in novel situations. Laterality 11(4):355–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lippolis G, Bisazza A, Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G (2002) Lateralization of predator avoidance responses in three species of toads. Laterality 7:163–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lonsdorf EV, Hopkins WD (2005) Wild chimpanzees show population-level handedness for tool use. PNAS 102:12634–12638CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Marchant LF, McGrew WC (1991) Laterality of function in apes: a meta-analysis of methods. J Hum Evol 21:425–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McDonnell SM (2003) The equid ethogram: a practical field guide to horse behavior. Eclipse Press, LexingtonGoogle Scholar
  20. McGreevy PD, Rogers LJ (2004) Motor and sensory laterality in thoroughbred horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 92:337–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Murphy J, Arkins S (2008) Facial hair whorls (trichoglyphs) and the incidence of motor laterality in the horse. Behav Process 79(1):7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Murphy J, Sutherland A, Arkins S (2004) Idiosyncratic motor laterality in the horse. Appl Anim Behav Sci 91:297–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nedellec-Bienvenue D, Blois-Heulin C (2005) Eye preferences in red-capped mangabeys. Folia Primatol 76:234–237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pfungst O (1911) Clever Hans (the Horse of Mr. Von Osten). Henry Holt, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Podhajsky A (1967) The complete training of horse and rider. The Sportsman’s Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Roberts M (2002) From my hands to yours. Lessons from a lifetime of training companionship horses. Monty and Pat Roberts Inc., SolvangGoogle Scholar
  27. Rogers LJ (2000) Evolution of hemispheric specialisation: advantages and disadvantages. Brain Lang 73:236–253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rogers LJ, Ward JP, Stafford D (1994) Eye dominance in the small-eared bushbaby, Otolemur garnettii. Neuropsychologia 32:257–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sovrano VV, Rainoldi C, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (1999) Roots of brain specializations: preferential left-eye use during mirror-image inspection in six species of teleost fish. Behav Brain Res 106:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Steinbrecht G (1886) Das gymnasium des pferdes. Döring Verlag, PotsdamGoogle Scholar
  31. Vallortigara G, Andrew RJ (1991) Lateralization of response by chicks to change in a model partner. Anim Behav 41:187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ (2005) Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization. Behav Brain Sci 28:575–589PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ward JP, Hopkins WD (1993) Primate laterality: current behavioural evidence of primate asymmetries. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  34. Williams DE, Norris BJ (2007) Laterality in stride pattern preferences in racehorses. Anim Behav 74:941–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zucca P, Sovrano VA (2008) Animal lateralization and social recognition: quails use their left visual hemifield when approaching a companion and their right visual hemifield when approaching a stranger. Cortex 44:13–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate Farmer
    • 1
  • Konstanze Krueger
    • 2
  • Richard W. Byrne
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of PsychologyUniversity of St AndrewsFifeScotland, UK
  2. 2.Department of Biology IUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations