Advertisement

Animal Cognition

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 197–205 | Cite as

Attributing attention: the use of human-given cues by domestic horses (Equus caballus)

  • Leanne Proops
  • Karen McComb
Original Paper

Abstract

Recent research has shown that domestic dogs are particularly good at determining the focus of human attention, often outperforming chimpanzees and hand-reared wolves. It has been suggested that the close evolutionary relationship between humans and dogs has led to the development of this ability; however, very few other domestic species have been studied. We tested the ability of 36 domestic horses to discriminate between an attentive and inattentive person in determining whom to approach for food. The cues provided were body orientation, head orientation or whether the experimenters’ eyes were open or closed. A fourth, mixed condition was included where the attentive person stood with their body facing away from the subjects but their head turned towards the subject while the inattentive person stood with their body facing the subject but their head turned away. Horses chose the attentive person significantly more often using the body cue, head cue, and eye cue but not the mixed cue. This result suggests that domestic horses are highly sensitive to human attentional cues, including gaze. The possible role of evolutionary and environmental factors in the development of this ability is discussed.

Keywords

Animal–human interaction Social cognition Domestication Gaze Begging task 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the members of staff at The Sussex Horse Rescue Trust and the owners of the horses at the Woodingdean livery yard for their support and willingness to facilitate this project. We also thank Ben Colwell and Laura Hazelton who contributed to this study in the course of their final year undergraduate research projects and Graeme Shannon and James McMichen for their help with data collection. The study complies with the United Kingdom Home Office regulations concerning animal research and welfare as well as the University of Sussex regulations on the use of animals. This work is supported by a quota studentship from the BBSRC (to L.P., supervised by K.M.).

References

  1. Agnetta B, Hare B, Tomasello M (2000) Cues to food location that domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) of different ages do and do not use. Anim Cogn 3:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen IL, Naevdal E, Boe KE, Bakken M (2006) The significance of theories in behavioural ecology for solving problems in applied ethology—possibilities and limitations. Appl Anim Behav Sci 97:85–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barth J, Reaux JE, Povinelli DJ (2005) Chimpanzees’ (Pan troglodytes) use of gaze cues in object-choice tasks: different methods yield different results. Anim Cogn 8:84–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartosova J, Dvorakova R, Vancatova M, Svobodova I (2008) Comprehension of human pointing gesture in domestic horses: effect of training method. In: Krueger K (ed) International Equine Science Meeting, University of Regensburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  5. Brauer J, Call J, Tomasello M (2004) Visual perspective taking in dogs (Canis familiaris) in the presence of barriers. Appl Anim Behav Sci 88:299–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bulloch MJ, Boysen ST, Furlong EE (2008) Visual attention and its relation to knowledge states in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Anim Behav 76:1147–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Call J, Brauer J, Kaminski J, Tomasello M (2003) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. J Comp Psychol 117:257–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Clutton-Brock J (1999) A natural history of domesticated animals. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper JJ (2007) Equine learning behaviour: common knowledge and systematic research. Behav Processes 76:24–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferrari PF, Kohler E, Fogassi L, Gallese V (2000) The ability to follow eye gaze and its emergence during development in macaque monkeys. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:13997–14002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Flombaum JI, Santos LR (2005) Rhesus monkeys attribute perceptions to others. Curr Biol 15:447–452CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gácsi M, Miklósi A, Varga O, Topál J, Csányi V (2004) Are readers of our face readers of our minds? Dogs (Canis familiaris) show situation-dependent recognition of human’s attention. Anim Cogn 7:144–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gácsi M, Kara E, Belényi B, Topál J, Miklósi Á (2008) The effect of development and individual differences in pointing comprehension of dogs. Anim Cogn 12:471–479. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0208-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giret N, Miklósi Á, Kreutzer M, Bovet D (2008) Use of experimenter-given cues by African gray parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Anim Cogn 12:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0163-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodwin D (1999) The importance of ethology in understanding the behaviour of the horse. Equine Vet J Suppl 28:15–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodwin D (2002) Horse behaviour: evolution, domestication and feralisation. In: Waran N (ed) The welfare of horses. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 19–44Google Scholar
  17. Hare B, Tomasello M (2004) Chimpanzees are more skilful in competitive than in cooperative cognitive tasks. Anim Behav 68:571–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hare B, Call J, Agnetta B, Tomasello M (2000) Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see. Anim Behav 59:771–785CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M (2001) Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know? Anim Behav 61:139–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1634–1636CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Harman AM, Moore S, Hoskins R, Keller P (1999) Horse vision and an explanation for the visual behaviour originally explained by the ‘ramp retina’. Equine Vet J 31:384–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hattori Y, Kuroshima H, Fujita K (2007) I know you are not looking at me: capuchin monkeys’ (Cebus apella) sensitivity to human attentional states. Anim Cogn 10:141–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hostetter AB, Cantero M, Hopkins WD (2001) Differential use of vocal and gestural communication by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in response to the attentional status of a human (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 115:337–343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hostetter AB, Russel JL, Freeman H, Hopkins WD (2007) Now you see me now you don’t: evidence that chimpanzees understand the role of the eyes in attention. Anim Cogn 10:55–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Itakura S, Bryan A, Hare B, Tomasello M (1999) Chimpanzee use of human and conspecific social cues to locate hidden food. Dev Sci 2:448–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jensen P (2002) The ethology of domestic animals: an introductory text. CABI, WallingfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaminski J, Call J, Tomasello M (2004) Body orientation and face orientation: two factors controlling apes’ begging behavior from humans. Anim Cogn 7:216–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M (2005) Domestic goats, Capra hircus, follow gaze direction and use social cues in an object choice task. Anim Behav 69:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leavens DA, Hostetter AB, Wesley MJ, Hopkins WD (2004) Tactical use of unimodal and bimodal communication by chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Anim Behav 67:467–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maros K, Gácsi M, Miklósi Á (2008) Comprehension of human pointing gestures in horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 11:457–466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. McComb K, Moss C, Sayialel S, Baker L (2000) Unusually extensive networks of vocal recognition in African elephants. Anim Behav 59:1103–1109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. McComb K, Moss C, Durant SM, Baker L, Sayialel S (2001) Matriarchs as repositories of social knowledge in African elephants. Science 292:491–494CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. McKinley J, Sambrook TD (2000) Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 3:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miklósi A, Polgárdi R, Topál J, Csányi V (1998) Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs. Anim Cogn 1:113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miklósi A, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Gácsi M, Virányi Z, Csányi V (2003) A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. Curr Biol 13:763–766CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Miklósi A, Pongrácz N, Lakatos G, Topál J, Csányi V (2005) A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans and cats (Felis catus) and humans. J Comp Psychol 119:179–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Outram AK, Stear NA, Bendrey R, Olsen S, Kasparov A, Zaibert V, Thorpe N, Evershed RP (2009) The earliest horse harnessing and milking. Science 323:1332–1335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pack AA, Herman LM (2004) Bottlenosed dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) comprehend the referent of both static and dynamic human gazing and pointing in an object-choice task. J Comp Psychol 118:160–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pfungst O (1965) Clever Hans (the horse of Mr. von Osten). In: Rosenthal R (ed) Holst (Rinehardt & Winston), New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Povinelli DJ, Eddy TJ (1996) What young chimpanzees know about seeing. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 61:153–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Proops L, McComb K, Reby D (2009) Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:947–951CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Riedel J, Schumann K, Kaminski J, Call J, Tomasello M (2008) The early ontogeny of human-dog communication. Anim Behav 75:1003–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scheumann M, Call J (2004) The use of experimenter-given cues by South African fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus). Anim Cogn 7:224–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Schloegl C, Kotrschal K, Bugnyar T (2008) Modifying the object-choice task: is the way you look important for ravens? Behav Processes 77:61–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Schwab C, Huber L (2006) Obey or not obey? Dogs (Canis familiaris) behave differently in response to attentional states of their owners. J Comp Psychol 120:169–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Shapiro AD, Janik VM, Slater PJB (2003) A gray seal’s (Halichoerus grypus) responses to experimenter-given pointing and directional cues. J Comp Psychol 117:355–362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Soproni K, Miklósi A, Topál J, Csányi V (2001) Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 115:122–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Soproni K, Miklósi A, Topál J, Csányi V (2002) Dogs’ (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. J Comp Psychol 116:27–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Takimoto A, Fujita K (2008) Are horses (Equus caballus) sensitive to human attentional states? In: Krueger K (ed) International Equine Science Meeting, University of Regensburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  50. Timney B, Keil K (1992) Visual acuity in the horse. Vis Res 32:2289–2293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Tomasello M, Hare B, Lehmann H, Call J (2007) Reliance on head versus eyes in the gaze following of great apes and human infants: the cooperative eye hypothesis. J Hum Evol 52:314–320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Tschudin A, Call J, Dunbar RIM, Harris G, van der Elst C (2001) Comprehension of signs by dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). J Comp Psychol 115:100–105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Udell MAR, Dorey NR, Wynne CDL (2008) Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues. Anim Behav 76:1767–1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vervill S, McDonnell S (2008) Equal outcomes with and without human-to-horse eye contact when catching horses and ponies in an open pasture. J Equine Vet Sci 28:309–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vick SJ, Anderson JR (2003) Use of human visual attention cues by olive baboons (Papio anubis) in a competitive task. J Comp Psychol 117:209–216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Virányi Z, Topál J, Gácsi M, Miklósi A, Csányi V (2004) Dogs respond appropriately to cues of humans’ attentional focus. Behav Processes 66:161–172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Virányi Z, Gácsi M, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Belényi B, Ujfalussy D, Miklósi Á (2008) Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn 11:373–397CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Waring G (2003) Horse behaviour, 2nd edn. Noyes & William Andrew, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  59. Wells SM, Goldschmidt-Rothschild BV (1979) Social behavior and relationships in a herd of Camargue horses. Z Tierpsychol 49:363–380Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Mammal Vocal Communication Research, School of PsychologyUniversity of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations