Advertisement

Animal Cognition

, 13:175 | Cite as

Landmark use by Clark’s nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana): influence of disorientation and cue rotation on distance and direction estimates

  • Debbie M. Kelly
  • Alan C. Kamil
  • Ken Cheng
Original Paper

Abstract

Many species have been shown to encode multiple sources of information to orient. To examine what kinds of information animals use to locate a goal we manipulated cue rotation, cue availability, and inertial orientation when the food-storing Clark’s nutcracker (Nucifraga columbiana) was searching for a hidden goal in a circular arena. Three groups of birds were used, each with a different goal–landmark distance. As the distance between the goal and the landmark increased, nutcrackers were less accurate in finding the correct direction to the goal than they were at estimating the distance (Experiment 1). To further examine what cues the birds were using to calculate direction, the featural cues within the environment were rotated by 90° and the birds were either oriented when searching (Experiments 2 and 3) or disoriented (Experiment 3). In Experiment 4, all distinctive visual cues were removed (both internal and external to the environment), a novel point of entry was used and the birds were either oriented or disoriented. We found that disorienting the nutcrackers so that they could not use inertial cues did not influence the birds’ total search error. The birds relied heavily but not completely on cues within the environment, as rotating available cues caused them to systematically shift their search behavior. In addition, the birds also relied to some extent on Earth-based cues. These results show the flexible nature of cue use by the Clark’s nutcracker. Our study shows how multiple sources of spatial information may be important for extracting multiple bearings for navigation.

Keywords

Landmark use Distance and direction estimation Intra-environmental cues Clark’s nutcracker 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Research was supported by a grant from National Institute of Mental Health to ACK and a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to DMK. We thank Brian Nuest, Tim Suhr, Tamara Griesel, and Jeff Wallace for assistance with conducting the experimental trials. We also wish to thank Walter F. Bischof for assisting with the development of data analyses programs. All experiments reported in this manuscript complied with the current laws of the United States and Canada.

References

  1. Balda RP (1987) Avian impacts on pinyon-juniper woodlands. In: Everett RL (ed) Proceedings of the Pinyon-Juniper conference: U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report No. 1NT-215, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 525–533Google Scholar
  2. Basil JA (1993) Neuroanatomical and behavioral correlates of spatial memory in Clark’s nutcrackers. University of Massachusetts. Unpublished dissertationGoogle Scholar
  3. Beason RC, Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W (1997) Pigeon homing: effects of magnetic pulses on initial orientation. Auk 114:405–415Google Scholar
  4. Bennett ATD (1993) Spatial memory in a food storing corvid I. Near tall landmarks are primarily used. J Comp Physiol A 173:193–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cartwright BA, Collett TS (1983) Landmark learning in bees. J Comp Physiol A 151:521–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng K (1986) A purely geometric module in the rat’s spatial representation. Cognition 23:149–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng K (1988) Some psychophysics of the pigeon’s use of landmarks. J Comp Physiol A 162:815–826CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng K (1989) The vector sum model of pigeon landmark use. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 15:366–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng K (1994) The determination of direction in landmark-based spatial search in pigeons: a further test of the vector sum model. Anim Learn Behav 22:291–301Google Scholar
  10. Cheng K (1998) Distances and directions are computed separately by honeybees in landmark-based search. Anim Learn Behav 26:455–548Google Scholar
  11. Cheng K (2008) Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module. Trends Cogn Sci 12:355–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng K, Newcombe NS (2005) Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence. Psychonom Bull Rev 12:1–23Google Scholar
  13. Cheng K, Narendra A, Wehner R (2006) Behavioral ecology of odometric memories in desert ants: acquisition, retention and integration. Behav Ecol 17:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheng K, Shettleworth SJ, Huttenlocher J, Rieser JJ (2007) Bayesian integration of spatial information. Psychol Bull 133:625–637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Collett TS, Cartwright BA, Smith BA (1986) Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils. J Comp Physiol A 158:835–851CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Della Chiesa A, Pecchia T, Tommasi L, Vallortigara G (2006) Multiple landmarks, the encoding of environmental geometry and the spatial logics of a dual brain. Anim Cogn 9:281–293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Doeller CF, Burgess N (2008) Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning of location relative to landmarks and boundaries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:5909–5914CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Doeller CF, King JA, Burgess N (2008) Parallel striatal hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:5915–5920CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Emlen ST (1970) Celestial rotation—its importance in development of migratory orientation. Science 170:1198–1201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Etienne AS (2003) How does path integration interact with olfaction, vision, and the representation of space? In: Jeffery KJ (ed) The neurobiology of spatial behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 48–66Google Scholar
  21. Etienne AS, Jeffery KJ (2004) Path integration in mammals. Hippocampus 14:180–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fiset S (2007) Landmark-based search memory in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 121:345–353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gagliardo A, Ioalè P, Savini M, Wild M (2008) Navigational abilities of homing pigeons deprived of olfactory or trigeminally mediated magnetic information when young. J Exp Biol 211:2046–2051CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gallistel CR (1990) The organization of learning. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodyear AJ, Kamil AC (2004) Clark’s nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) and the effects of goal–landmark distance on overshadowing. J Comp Psychol 118:258–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gould-Beierle K (2000) A comparison of four corvid species in a working and reference memory task using a radial maze. J Comp Psychol 114:347–356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hagstrum JT (2000) Infrasound and the avian navigational map. J Exp Biol 203:1103–1111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Healy SA (1998) Spatial representation in animals. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Jeffery KJ (2003) The neurobiology of spatial behaviour. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Jouventin P, Weimerskirch H (1990) Satellite tracking of wandering albatrosses. Nature 343:746–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kamil AC, Balda RP (1985) Cache recovery and spatial memory in Clark’s nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 11:95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kamil AC, Cheng K (2001) Way-finding and landmarks: the multiple-bearings hypothesis. J Exp Biol 2043:103–113Google Scholar
  33. Kamil AC, Jones JE (1997) The seed-storing corvid Clark’s nutcracker learns geometric relationship among landmarks. Nature 390:276–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kamil AC, Jones JE (2000) Geometric rule learning by Clark’s nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 26:439–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kamil AC, Goodyear AJ, Cheng K (2001) The use of landmarks by Clark’s nutcrackers: first tests of a new model. J Navig 54:429–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kelly DM, Spetch ML (2001) Pigeons encode relative geometry. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 27:417–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kelly DM, Spetch ML, Heth CD (1998) Pigeons’ (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. J Comp Psychol 112:259–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Körding K (2007) Decision theory: what “should” the nervous system so? Science 318:606–610CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Körding K, Beierholm U, Ma JW, Quartz S, Tenenbaum JB, Shams L (2007) Casual inference in multisensory perception. PLoS ONE 2:e943CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. LaDage LD, Roth TC, Fox RA, Pravosudov VV (2009) Flexible cue use in food-caching birds. Anim Cogn 12:419–426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lohmann KJ, Lohmann CMF, Endres CS (2008) The sensory ecology of ocean navigation. J Exp Biol 211:1719–1728CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Margules J, Gallistel CR (1998) Heading in the rat: determination by environmental shape. Anim Learn Behav 16:404–410Google Scholar
  43. Menzel R, Greggers U, Smith A, Berger S, Brandt R, Brunke S, Bundrock G et al (2005) Honey bees navigate according to a map-like memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:3040–3045CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Müller M, Wehner R (1994) The hidden spiral—systematic search and path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. J Comp Physiol A 175:525–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nevitt GA (2008) Sensory ecology on the high seas: the odor world of the procellariiform seabirds. J Exp Biol 211:1706–1713CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Phillips JB, Schmidt-Koenig K, Muheim R (2006) True navigation: sensory bases of gradient maps. In: Brown MF, Cook RG (eds) Animal spatial cognition: comparative, neural, and computational approaches. Available: http://www.pigeon.tufts.edu/asc/phillips. Accessed 18 May 2009
  47. Shettleworth SJ (1998) Cognition, evolution and behavior. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  48. Sutton JE, Shettleworth SJ (2005) Internal sense of direction and landmark use in pigeons (Columba livia). J Comp Psychol 119:273–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Thalau P, Holtkamp-Rötzler E, Fleissner G, Wiltschko W (2007) Homing pigeons (Columba livia f. domestica) can use magnetic cues for locating food. Naturwissenschaften 94:813–819CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Tomback DF (1980) How nutcrackers find their seeds. Condor 82:10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Towne WF, Moscrip H (2008) The connection between landscapes and the solar ephemeris in honeybees. J Exp Biol 211:3729–3736CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M, Pasti G (1990) Geometric modules in animals’ spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). J Comp Psychol 104:248–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Vander Wall SB (1982) An experimental analysis of cache recovery in Clark’s nutcrackers. Anim Behav 30:84–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vlasak AN (2006) Global and local spatial landmarks: their role during foraging by Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus). Anim Cogn 9:71–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. von Frisch K, Lindauer M (1954) Himmel und Erde in Konkurrenz bei der Orientierung der Bienen [Sky and Earth in competition in the orientation of bees]. Naturwissenschaften 41:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. von Saint Paul U (1982) Do geese use path integration for walking home? In: Papi FP, Wallraff HG (eds) Avian navigation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 298–307Google Scholar
  57. Wallraff HG (2004) Avian olfactory navigation: its empirical foundation and conceptual state. Anim Behav 67:189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wehner R (2003) Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks. J Comp Physiol A 189:579–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wehner R, Räber F (1979) Visual spatial memory in desert ants, genus Cataglyphis (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). Experientia 35:1569–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wehner R, Srinivasan MV (2003) Path integration in insects. In: Jeffery KJ (ed) The neurobiology of spatial behaviour. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 9–30Google Scholar
  61. Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W (2004) Clock-shift experiments with homing pigeons: a compromise between solar and magnetic information? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:393–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wiltschko W, Balda RP, Jahnel M, Wiltschko R (1999) Sun compass orientation in seed-caching corvids: its role in spatial memory. Anim Cogn 2:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zeil J, Hemmi JM (2006) The visual ecology of fiddler crabs. J Comp Physiol A 192:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada
  2. 2.University of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA
  3. 3.Macquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations