Advertisement

Cue use by foals (Equus caballus) in a discrimination learning task

  • 289 Accesses

  • 13 Citations

Abstract

Discrimination learning studies suggest that horses learn more easily using spatial than visible object-specific (OS) cues. However, spatial cues have generally confounded intra-array, distal and/or egocentric spatial information. It is also unclear whether conflicting cues compete for association or are redundantly encoded, and furthermore, the influence of prior experiences or training has not been quantified so far. We examined the effect of cue modality on unweaned foals’ performance in a discrimination learning task. After a pilot study confirmed that horses could perform the required OS cue discrimination, nine foals learnt to find food in one of three covered buckets, in any of four positions within a test arena. In Stage 1 the rewarded bucket was signified both by OS cues (pattern) and by relative spatial cues (position). On reaching criterion, cues were separated and foals had to ignore the inappropriate cue (Stage 2). Foals assigned to follow spatial cues (n = 5) completed Stage 2 faster than foals for whom OS cues remained consistent (n = 4). Spatial group foals all reached criterion without delay; no foal in the OS group reached criterion within the testing period. OS group foals initially persisted in responding to the previously correct position, adopting spatially-based strategies when this proved unsuccessful. The findings show for the first time that, even in the absence of distal spatial information, intra-array spatial cues were more salient than OS cues for foals in a food-finding task and learning appeared rather inflexible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Bottom SH, Owen H, Lawson RE, Harris PA, Hall S (2004) Equine feeding side preference—incidence and age effect. In: Alliston J, Chadd S, Ede A, Hemmings A, Hyslop J, Longland A, Moreton H, Moore-Colyer M (eds) Emerging equine science. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, pp 223–225

  2. Brodbeck DR (1994) Memory for spatial and local cues—a comparison of a storing and a nonstoring species. Anim Learn Behav 22:119–133

  3. Brodbeck DR, Shettleworth SJ (1995) Matching location and color of a compound stimulus—comparison of a food-storing and a nonstoring bird species. J Exp Psychol 21:64–77

  4. Brown GS (1994) Spatial association learning by rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus): effects of relative spacing among stimuli. J Comp Psychol 108:29–35

  5. Bruce V, Green P, Georgeson M (1996) Visual perception: physiology, psychology and ecology, 3rd edn. Psychology Press, Hove

  6. Church DL, Plowright CMS (2006) Spatial encoding by bumblebees (Bombus impatiens) of a reward within an artificial flower array. Anim Cogn 9:131–140. doi:10.1007/s10071-005-0011-6

  7. Clayton NS, Krebs JR (1994) Memory for spatial and object-specific cues in food-storing and nonstoring birds. J Comp Physiol A 174:371–379

  8. Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112:155–159

  9. Devenport JA, Patterson MR, Devenport LD (2005) Dynamic averaging and foraging decisions in horses (Equus caballus). J Comp Psychol 119:352–358. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.119.3.352

  10. Dumont B, Petit M (1998) Spatial memory of sheep at pasture. Appl Anim Behav Sci 60:43–53

  11. Edwards GR, Newman JA, Parsons AJ, Krebs JR (1996) The use of spatial memory by grazing animals to locate food patches in spatially heterogeneous environments: an example with sheep. Appl Anim Behav Sci 50:147–160

  12. Edwards GR, Newman JA, Parsons AJ, Krebs JR (1997) Use of cues by grazing animals to locate food patches: an example with sheep. Appl Anim Behav Sci 51:59–68

  13. Fiske JC, Potter GD (1979) Discrimination reversal-learning in yearling horses. J Anim Sci 49:583–588

  14. Geisbauer G, Griebel U, Schmid A, Timney B (2004) Brightness discrimination and neutral point testing in the horse. Can J Zool 82:660–670

  15. Gray ER, Spetch ML (2006) Pigeons encode absolute distance but relational direction from landmarks and walls. J Exp Psychol 32:474–480. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.32.4.474

  16. Haag EL, Rudman R, Houpt KA (1980) Avoidance, maze-learning and social-dominance in ponies. J Anim Sci 50:329–335

  17. Hall CA, Cassaday HJ, Derrington AM (2003) The effect of stimulus height on visual discrimination in horses. J Anim Sci 81:1715–1720

  18. Hall CA, Cassaday HJ, Vincent CJ, Derrington AM (2006) Cone excitation ratios correlate with color discrimination performance in the horse (Equus caballus). J Comp Psychol 120:438–448. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.120.4.438

  19. Hanggi EB (1999) Categorization learning in horses (Equus caballus). J Comp Psychol 113:243–252

  20. Hanggi EB (2003) Discrimination learning based on relative size concepts in horses (Equus caballus). Appl Anim Behav Sci 83:201–213. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00136-9

  21. Harman AM, Moore S, Hoskins R, Keller P (1999) Horse vision and an explanation for the visual behaviour originally explained by the ‘ramp retina’. Equine Vet J 31:384–390

  22. Healy SD, Hurly TA (1998) Rufous hummingbords’ (Selasphorus rufus) memory for flowers: patterns or actual spatial locations? J Exp Psychol 24:396–404

  23. Hebel R (1976) Distribution of retinal ganglion-cells in 5 mammalian-species (Pig, Sheep, Ox, Horse, Dog). Anat Embryol (Berl) 150:45–51

  24. Heird JC, Lokey CE, Cogan DC (1986) Repeatability and comparison of 2 maze tests to measure learning-ability in horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 16:103–119

  25. Howery LD, Bailey DW, Ruyle GB, Renken WJ (2000) Cattle use visual cues to track food locations. Appl Anim Behav Sci 67:1–14

  26. Kendrick KM, da Costa AP, Leigh AE, Hinton MR, Peirce JW (2001) Sheep don’t forget a face. Nature 414:165–166

  27. Köhler W (1970) Gestalt psychology: an introduction to new concepts in modern psychology. Liveright, New York

  28. Kratzer DD, Netherland WM, Pulse RE, Baker JP (1977) Maze-learning in quarter horses. J Anim Sci 45:896–902

  29. Krüger K, Flauger B (2008) Social feeding decisions in horses (Equus caballus). Behav Processes 78:76–83. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2008.01.009

  30. Langbein J, Nürnberg G, Pappe B, Manteuffel G (2006) Self-controlled visual discrimination learning of group-housed dwarf goats (Capra hircus): behavioral strategies and effects of relocation on learning and memory. J Comp Psychol 120:58–66

  31. Lansade L, Bertrand M, Bouissou MF (2005) Effects of neonatal handling on subsequent manageability, reactivity and learning ability of foals. Appl Anim Behav Sci 92:143–158. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2004.10.014

  32. Lee C, Colegate S, Fisher AD (2006) Development of a maze test and its application to assess spatial learning and memory in Merino sheep. Appl Anim Behav Sci 96:43–51. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2005.06.001

  33. López JC, Broglio C, Rodríguez F, Thinus-Blanc C, Salas C (1999) Multiple spatial learning strategies in goldfish (Carassius auratus). Anim Cogn 2:109–120

  34. Mader DR, Price EO (1980) Discrimination-learning in horses—effects of breed, age and social-dominance. J Anim Sci 50:962–965

  35. Mal ME, McCall CA, Newland C, Cummins KA (1993) Evaluation of a one-trial learning apparatus to test learning-ability weanling horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 35:305–311

  36. March J, Chamizo VD, Mackintosh NJ (1992) Reciprocal overshadowing between intra-maze and extra-maze cues. Q J Exp Psychol B 45B:49–63

  37. Marinier SL, Alexander AJ (1994) The use of a maze in testing learning and memory in horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 39:177–182

  38. Maros K, Gácsi M, Miklósi A (2008) Comprehension of human pointing gestures in horses, Equus caballus. Anim Cogn 11:457–466. doi:10.1007/s10071-008-0136-5

  39. Martin TI, Zentall TR, Lawrence L (2006) Simple discrimination reversals in the domestic horse (Equus caballus): effect of discriminative stimulus modality on learning to learn. Appl Anim Behav Sci 101:328–338. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.011

  40. Mauck B, Dehnhardt G (2007) Spatial multiple-choice matching in a harbour seal (Phoca vitulina): differential encoding of landscape versus local feature information? Anim Cogn 10:397–405. doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0074-7

  41. McCall CA, Potter GD, Friend TH, Ingram RS (1981) Learning-abilities in yearling horses using the Hebb-Williams closed field maze. J Anim Sci 53:928–933

  42. McGreevy PD (2004) Equine behavior: a guide for veterinarians and equine scientists, 1st edn. Saunders Ltd, Edinburgh

  43. McGreevy PD, Thomson PC (2006) Differences in motor laterality between breeds of performance horse. Appl Anim Behav Sci 99:183–190. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2005.09.010

  44. McGregor A, Healy SD (1999) Spatial accuracy in food-storing and nonstoring birds. Anim Behav 58:727–734

  45. Nicol CJ (2002) Equine learning: progress and suggestions for future research. Appl Anim Behav Sci 78:193–208

  46. Pearce JM (1997) Animal learning and cognition: an introduction, 2nd edn. Psychology Press, Hove

  47. Rybarczyk P, Koba Y, Rushen J, Tanida H, de Passille AM (2001) Can cows discriminate people by their faces? Appl Anim Behav Sci 74:175–189

  48. Sanchez-Moreno J, Rodrigo T, Chamizo VD, MacKintosh NJ (1999) Overshadowing in the spatial domain. Anim Learn Behav 27:391–398

  49. Sappington BKF, McCall CA, Coleman DA, Kuhlers DL, Lishak RS (1997) A preliminary study of the relationship between discrimination reversal learning and performance tasks in yearling and 2-year-old horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 53:157–166

  50. Saslow CA (1999) Factors affecting stimulus visibility for horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 61:273–284

  51. Sherry DF, Duff SJ (1996) Behavioural and neural bases of orientation in food-storing birds. J Exp Biol 199:165–172

  52. Shettleworth SJ, Westwood RP (2002) Divided attention, memory, and spatial discrimination in food-storing and nonstoring birds, black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapilla) and dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis). J Exp Psychol 28:227–241. doi:10.1037//0097-7403.28.3.227

  53. SISA (2008) Simple interactive statistical analysis. Available via http://www.quantitativeskills.com/sisa/distributions/binomial.htm

  54. Spetch ML (1995) Overshadowing in landmark learning—touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans. J Exp Psychol 21:166–181

  55. Timney B, Keil K (1992) Visual-acuity in the horse. Vis Res 32:2289–2293

  56. Timney B, Keil K (1999) Local and global stereopsis in the horse. Vis Res 39:1861–1867

  57. Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M (1989) Place and object learning in chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). J Comp Psychol 103:201–209

  58. Vlasak AN (2006) Global and local spatial landmarks: their role during foraging by Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus). Anim Cogn 9:71–80. doi:10.1007/s10071-005-0006-3

  59. Voith VL (1975) Pattern discrimination, learning set formation, memory retention, spatial and visual reversal learning by the horse (Masters Thesis). Ohio State University, Columbus

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to staff and students of Hartpury College for assistance, to Nina Taylor for useful discussions on mammalian visual systems, and to Nikki Rooney and four anonymous referees for helpful comments on a draft of the manuscript. All of the work described above complied with current UK laws.

Author information

Correspondence to B. Hothersall.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (MPG 2048 kb)

Supplementary material 1 (MPG 2048 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hothersall, B., Gale, E.V., Harris, P. et al. Cue use by foals (Equus caballus) in a discrimination learning task. Anim Cogn 13, 63–74 (2010) doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0245-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cue
  • Spatial
  • Discrimination
  • Equine
  • Horse