Animal Cognition

, Volume 12, Issue 5, pp 745–750

Learning, memorizing and apparent forgetting of chemical cues from new predators by Iberian green frog tadpoles

Short Communication

Abstract

Many antipredator adaptations are induced by the prey’s ability to recognize chemical cues from predators. However, predator recognition often requires learning by prey individuals. Iberian green frog tadpoles (Pelophylax perezi) have the ability to learn new potential predators. Here, we tested the memory capabilities of Iberian green frog tadpoles. We conditioned tadpoles with chemicals cues from a non-predatory fish in conjunction with conspecific alarm cues, and examined whether tadpoles retained their conditioned response (reduction of activity level). We found that conditioned tadpoles reduced their activity levels in subsequent exposures to the non-predatory fish cues alone. Tadpoles were able to remember this association and reduced movement rate at least for 9 days after. The ability to learn and memorize potential predators may be especially important for the survivorship of prey species that are likely to find a high variety of predators. However, after those 9 days, there was a lack of response to the non-predatory fish cues alone in the absence of reinforcement. This could be explained if tadpoles behave according to the threat-sensitive predator avoidance hypothesis, and the perceived risk to the learning cue diminished over time, or it could be due to an apparent forgetting process to avoid non-adaptative responses to chemical cues of non-dangerous species that were randomly paired with alarm cues. Thus, this study demonstrates that green frog tadpoles in the absence of reinforcement remember the chemical cues of a learned predator only for a limited time that may be adaptative in a threat-sensitive context.

Keywords

Alarm cues Memory Predation risk Predator recognition Frogs Pelophylax perezi 

References

  1. ASIH (2004) Guidelines for use of live amphibians and reptiles in field and laboratory research. Herpetological Animal Care and Use Committee (HACC) of the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists. Lawrence, KansasGoogle Scholar
  2. Berejikian BA, Smith RJF, Tezak EP, Schroder SL, Knudsen CM (1999) Chemical alarm signals and complex hatchery rearing habitats affect antipredator behavior and survival of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) juveniles. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:830–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown GE, Smith RJF (1998) Acquired predator recognition in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): conditioning hatchery-reared fish to recognize chemical cues of a predator. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:611–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown GE, Gershaneck DL, Plata DL, Golub JL (2002) Ontogenetic changes in response to heterospecific alarm cues by juvenile largemouth bass are phenotypically plastic. Behaviour 139:913–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chivers DP, Smith RJF (1994a) Fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, acquire predator recognition when alarm substance is associated with the sight of unfamiliar fish. Anim Behav 48:597–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chivers DP, Smith RJF (1994b) The role of experience and chemical alarm signalling in predator recognition by fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas. J Fish Biol 44:273–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chivers DP, Smith RJF (1998) Chemical alarm signalling in aquatic predator/prey interactions: a review and prospectus. Ecoscience 5:338–352Google Scholar
  8. Dodson SI, Crowl TA, Peckarsky BL, Kats LB, Covich AP, Culp JM (1994) Non-visual communication in freshwater benthos: an overview. J Natl Am Benthol Soc 13:268–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dukas R (2002) Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 357:1539–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferrari MCO, Chivers DP (2006) Learning threat-sensitive predator avoidance: how do fathead minnows incorporate conflicting information? Anim Behav 71:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. García-París M (2000) Rana perezi. In: Ramos MA (ed) Amphibia, Lissamphhibia. Fauna Iberica, vol 24. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Madrid, pp 467–478Google Scholar
  12. Golub JL, Brown GE (2003) Are all signals the same? Ontogenetic changes in the response to conspecific and heterospecific alarm signals by juvenile green sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:113–118Google Scholar
  13. Gonzalo A, López P, Martín J (2007) Iberian green frog tadpoles may learn to recognize novel predators from chemical alarm cues of conspecifics. Anim Behav 74:447–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190Google Scholar
  15. Göz H (1941) Über den art-und individualgeruch bei fischen. Z Verg Physiol 29:1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grafen A, Hails R (2002) Modern statistics for the life sciences. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Hawkins LA, Magurran AE, Armstrong JD (2007) Ontogenetic learning of predator recognition in hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Anim Behav 75:1663–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hazlett BA (2003) Predator recognition and learned irrelevance in the crayfish Orconectes virilis. Ethology 109:765–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hazlett BA, Acquistapace P, Gherardi F (2002) Differences in memory capabilities in invasive and native crayfish. J Crustacean Biol 22:439–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Helfman GS (1989) Threat-sensitive predator avoidance in damselfish–trumpetfish interactions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hendersen RW (1985) Fearful memories: the motivational significance of forgetting. In: Brush FR, Overmier JB (eds) Affect, conditioning, and cognition: essays on the determinants of behaviour. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 43–53Google Scholar
  22. Jacobsen HP, Stabell O-B (2004) Antipredator behaviour mediated by chemical cues: the role of conspecific alarm signalling and predator labelling in the avoidance response of a marine gastropod. Oikos 104:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kats LB, Dill LM (1998) The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation by prey animals. Ecoscience 5:361–394Google Scholar
  24. Kiesecker JM, Chivers DP, Blaustein AR (1996) The use of chemical cues in predator recognition by western toad (Bufo boreas) tadpoles. Anim Behav 52:1237–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kraemer PJ, Golding JM (1997) Adaptive forgetting in animals. Psychon B Rev 4:480–491Google Scholar
  26. Larson JK, McCormick MI (2005) The role of chemical alarm signals in facilitating learned recognition of novel chemical cues in a coral reef fish. Anim Behav 69:51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lima SL (1998) Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator-prey interactions: what are the ecological effects of anti-predator decision-making? Bioscience 48:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Magurran AE (1989) Acquired recognition of predator odour in the European minnow (Phoxinus phoxinus). Ethology 82:216–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mathis A, Smith RJF (1993) Fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, learn to recognize northern pike, Esox lucius, as predators on the basis of chemical stimuli from minnows in the pike’s diet. Anim Behav 46:645–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matzel LD, Collin C, Alkon DL (1992) Biophysical and behavioral correlates of memory storage, degradation, and reactivation. Behav Neurosci 106:954–963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mirza RS, Chivers DP (2000) Predator recognition training enhances survival of brook trout: evidence from laboratory and field-enclosure studies. Can J Zool 78:2198–2208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mirza RS, Ferrari MCO, Kiesecker JM, Chivers DP (2006) Responses of American toad tadpoles to predation cues: behavioural response thresholds, threat-sensitivity and acquired predation recognition. Behaviour 143:877–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Monk CM, Gunderson VM, Grant KS, Mechling JL (1996) A demonstration of the memory savings effect in infant monkeys. Dev Psychol 32:1051–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nicholson DA, Sweet JA, Freeman JH Jr (2003) Long-term retention of the classically conditioned eyeblink response in rats. Behav Neurosci 117:871–875PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Petranka JW, Kats LB, Sih A (1987) Predator–prey interactions among fish and larval amphibians: use of chemical cues to detect predatory fish. Anim Behav 35:420–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Philips GT, Tzvetkova EI, Marinesco S, Carew TJ (2006) Latent memory for sensitization in Aplysia. Learn Mem 13:224–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Plotkin HC, Oakley DA (1975) Backward conditioning in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). J Comp Physiol Psychol 88:586–590PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rohr JR, Madison DM (2001) A chemically mediated trade-off between predation risk and mate search in newts. Anim Behav 62:863–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shettleworth SJ (1998) Cognition, evolution and behaviour. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. WH Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Turner AM, Turner SE, Lappi HM (2005) Learning, memory and predator avoidance by freshwater snails: effects of experience on predator recognition and defensive strategy. Anim Behav 72:1443–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Von Frisch K (1938) Zur psychologie des fische-schwarmes. Naturwissenschaften 26:601–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Woody DR, Mathis A (1998) Acquired recognition of chemical stimuli from an unfamiliar predator: associative learning by adult newts, Notophthalmus viridescens. Copeia 1998:1027–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yunker WK, Wein DE, Wisenden BD (1999) Conditioned alarm behavior in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) resulting from association of chemical alarm pheromone with a nonbiological visual stimulus. J Chem Ecol 25:2677–2686CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Ecología EvolutivaMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, C.S.I.C.MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations