Advertisement

Animal Cognition

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 547–558 | Cite as

Its own reward: lessons to be drawn from the reversed-reward contingency paradigm

  • Eran M. ShiffermanEmail author
Review

Abstract

This is a review of the reversed-reward contingency (RRC) paradigm in animals and the cognitive functions on which it is founded. I shall present the RRC basic paradigm and the ensuing modifications it underwent, the animals tested, the results obtained and the analyses offered within the literature. Then I would the claim that RRC is a case of a compound cognitive behavior, one that is the result of interactions between three other cognitive functions: crude numerical assessment and economic choice (uniting value assignment and behavioral inhibition). I will present data concerning these three fields and will demonstrate how they are both affecting and affected by the findings of the RRC scheme. RRC is treated here as a test case for a broader type of analysis, one which, hopefully, will show that in order to fully understand composite and complex behavior we need to meticulously explore its building blocks and their dynamic interplay.

Keywords

Numerosity Relative numerousness judgment Economic choice Behavioral inhibition Evolutionary developmental biology Weber’s law Cognition 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank prof. Eva Jablonka for reviewing the manuscript and offering insightful corrections and guidance. I would also like to thank deeply two of my referees for their thorough reading and highly constructive comments.

References

  1. Agrillo C, Dadda M, Serena G, Bisazza A (2008) Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish. Anim Cogn 11(3):495–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albaich-Serrano A, Guillén-Salazar F, Call J (2007) Mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus lunulatus) solve the reverse contingency task without a modified procedure. Anim Cogn 10:387–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson ML (2006) Evidence for massive redeployment of brain areas in cognitive function. Proc Cogn Sci Soc 28:24–29Google Scholar
  4. Anderson ML (2007a) Evolution of cognitive function via redeployment of brain areas. Neuroscientist 13(1):13–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson ML (2007b) Massive redeployment, exaptation, and the functional integration of cognitive operations. Synthese 159(3):329–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson JR, Awazu S, Fujita K (2000) Can squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) learn self-control? A study using food array selection tests and reverse-reward contingency. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 26(1):87–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson JR, Awazu S, Fujita K (2004) Squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) choose smaller food arrays: long-term retention, choice with nonpreferred food, and transposition. J Comp Psychol 118(1):58–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beran MJ, Evans TA, Harris EH (2008) Perception of food amounts by chimpanzees based on the number, size, contour length and visibility of items. Anim Behav 75(5):1793–1802PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biro D, Matsuzawa T (2001) Use of numerical symbols by the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): Cardinals, ordinals, and the introduction of zero. Anim Cogn 4(3–4):193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boysen ST, Berntson GG (1989) Numerical competence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 103(1):23–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boysen ST, Berntson GG (1995) Responses to quantity––perceptual versus cognitive mechanisms in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 21(1):82–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boysen ST, Bernston GG, Hannan MB, Cacioppo JT (1996) Quantity-based interference and symbolic representations in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 22:76–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boysen ST, Mukobi KL, Berntson GG (1999) Overcoming response bias using symbolic representations of number by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Anim Learn Behav 27(2):229–235Google Scholar
  14. Boysen ST, Berntson GG, Mukobi KL (2001) Size matters: impact of item size and quantity on array choice by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 115(1):106–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brannon EM, Roitman J (2003) Nonverbal representations of time and number in non-human animals and human infants. In: Meck W (ed) Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing. CRC Press, New York, pp 143–182Google Scholar
  16. Chittka L, Geiger K (1995) Can honey-bees count landmarks. Anim Behav 49(1):159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chudasama Y, Kralik J, Murray E (2007) Rhesus monkeys with orbital prefrontal cortex lesions can learn to inhibit prepotent responses in the reversed reward contingency task. Cereb Cortex 17(5):1154–1159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dacke M, Srinivasan MV (2008). Evidence for counting in insects. Anim Cogn. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0159-y
  19. Dehaene S (2002) Single-neuron arithmetic. Science 297(5587):1652–1653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dehaene S, Changeux JP (1993) Development of elementary numerical abilities: a neuronal model. J Cogn Neuro 5(4):390–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evans TA, Beran MJ (2007) Delay of gratification and delay maintenance by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). J Gen Psychol 134(2):199–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Genty E, Roeder JJ (2006) Self-control: why should sea lions, Zalophus californianus, perform better than primates? Anim Behav 72(6):1241–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Genty E, Roeder JJ (2007) Transfer of self-control in black (Eulemur macaco) and brown (Eulemur fulvus) lemurs: choice of a less preferred food item under a reverse-reward contingency. J Comp Psychol 121(4):354–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Genty E, Palmier C, Roeder JJ (2004) Learning to suppress responses to the larger of two rewards in two species of lemurs, Eulemur fulvus and E. macaco. Anim Behav 67:925–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Godin JG, Keenleyside M (1984) Foraging on patchily distributed prey by a cichlid fish (Teleostei, Cichlidae): a test of the ideal free distribution theory. Anim Behav 32:120–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gould SJ, Vrba E (1982) Exaptation: a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8(1):4–15Google Scholar
  27. Hauser MD (1999) Perseveration, inhibition and the prefrontal cortex: a new look. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9(2):214–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hayden BY, Platt ML (2007) Animal cognition––great apes wait for grapes. Curr Biol 17(21):R922–R923PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoare DJ, Couzin ID, Godin JGJ, Krause J (2004) Context-dependent group-size choice in fish. Anim Behav 67(1):155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Iversen SD, Mishkin M (1970) Perseverative interference in monkeys following selective lesions of the inferior prefrontal convexity. Exp Brain Res 11(4):376–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones B, Mishkin M (1972) Limbic lesions and the problem of stimulus-reinforcement associations. Exp Neurol 36(2):362–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kalenscher T, Ohmann T, Güntürkün O (2006) The neuroscience of impulsive and self-controlled decisions. Int J Psychophysiol 62:203–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Karban R, Black CA, Weinbaum SA (2000) How 17-year cicadas keep track of time. Ecol Lett 3(3):253–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kralik JD (2005) Inhibitory control and response selection in problem solving: how cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) overcome a bias for selecting the larger quantity of food. J Comp Psychol 119(1):78–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kralik JD, Hauser MD, Zimlicki R (2002) The relationship between problem solving and inhibitory control: cotton-top tamarin (Saguinus oedipus) performance on a reversed contingency task. J Comp Psychol 116(1):39–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Krueger LE (1989) Reconciling Fechner and Stevens: toward a unified psychophysical law. Behav Brain Sci 12(2):251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kudo H, Dunbar RIM (2001) Neocortex size and social network size in primates. Anim Behav 62(4):711–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leppik EE (1953) The ability of insects to distinguish number. Am Nat 87(835):229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mischel W (1974) Processes in delay of gratification. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Adavnces in experimental social psychology. Academic Press, New York, pp 249–292Google Scholar
  40. Murray EA, Kralik JD, Wise SP (2005) Learning to inhibit prepotent responses: successful performance by rhesus macaques, Macaca mulatta, on the reversed-contingency task. Anim Behav 69:991–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nieder A (2005) Counting on neurons: the neurobiology of numerical competence. Nat Rev Neurosci 6(3):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nieder A, Merten K (2007) A labeled-line code for small and large numerosities in the monkey prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 27(22):5986–5993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nieder A, Miller EK (2003) Coding of cognitive magnitude: compressed scaling of numerical information in the primate prefrontal cortex. Neuron 37(1):149–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nieder A, Miller EK (2004a) A parieto-frontal network for visual numerical information in the monkey. PNAS 101(19):7457–7462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nieder A, Miller EK (2004b) Analog numerical representations in rhesus monkeys: evidence for parallel processing. J Cogn Neurosci 16(5):889–901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nieder A, Freedman DJ, Miller EK (2002) Representation of the quantity of visual items in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science 297(5587):1708–1711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nieder A, Diester I, Tudusciuc O (2006) Temporal and spatial enumeration processes in the primate parietal cortex. Science 313(5792):1431–1435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Padoa-Schioppa C (2007) Orbitofrontal cortex and the computation of economic value. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1121:232–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Padoa-Schioppa C, Assad JA (2006) Neurons in the orbitofromtal cortex encode economic value. Nature 441(7090):223–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Padoa-Schioppa C, Assad JA (2008) The representation of economic value in the orbitofrontal cortex is invariant for changes of menu. Nat Neurosci 11(1):95–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Padoa-Schioppa C, Jandolo L, Visalberghi E (2006) Multi-stage mental process for economic choice in capuchins. Cognition 99(1):B1–B13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pepperberg IM (2006) Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus) numerical abilities: addition and further experiments on a zero-like concept. J Comp Psychol 120(1):1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pepperberg IM, Gordon JD (2005) Number comprehension by a grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus), including a zero-like concept. J Comp Psychol 119(2):197–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reznikova ZI, Ryabko BY (2001) A study of ants’ numerical competence. Elec Trans Art Intel 5(Sect B):111–126Google Scholar
  55. Ridderinkhof KR, van den Wildenberg WPM, Segalowitz SJ, Carter CS (2004) Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: the role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning. Brain Cogn 56(2):129–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roberts AC, Wallis JD (2000) Inhibitory control and affective processing in the prefrontal cortex: neuropsychological studies in the common marmoset. Cereb Cortex 10:252–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rogers RD, Owen AM, Middleton HC, Williams EJ, Pickard JD, Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW (1999) Choosing between small, likely rewards and large, unlikely rewards activates inferior and orbital prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 19(20):9029–9038PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Rosati AG, Stevens JR, Hare B, Hauser MD (2007) The evolutionary origins of human patience: temporal preferences in chimpanzees, bonobos, and human adults. Curr Biol 17:1663–1668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shumaker RW, Palkovich AM, Beck BB, Guagnano GA, Morowitz H (2001) Spontaneous use of magnitude discrimination and ordination by the orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 115(4):385–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Silberberg A, Fujita K (1996) Pointing at smaller food amounts in an analogue of Boysen and Berntson’s (1995) procedure. J Exp Anal Behav 66(1):143–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stevens JR, Hallinan EV, Hauser MD (2005) The ecology and evolution of patience in two New world monkeys. Biol Lett 1(2):223–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Suda C, Call J (2004) Piagetian liquid conservation in the Great Apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, and Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 118(3):265–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sulkowski GM, Hauser MD (2001) Can rhesus monkeys spontaneously subtract? Cognition 79(3):239–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tegeder RW, Krause J (1995) Density dependence and numerosity in fright stimulated aggregation behaviour of shoaling fish. Philos Tran R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 350(1334):381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tomasello M, Call J (1997) Primate cognition. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Tudusciuc O, Nieder A (2007) Neuronal population coding of continuous and discrete quantity in the primate posterior parietal cortex. PNAS 104(36):14513–14518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Uher J, Call J (2008) How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios. J Comp Psychol 122(2):204–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Uller C, Jaeger R, Guidry G, Martin C (2003) Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of number in an amphibian. Anim Cogn 6(2):105–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Vlamings PHJM, Uher J, Call J (2006) How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed contingency task: the effects of food quantity and food visibility. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 32(1):6–70Google Scholar
  70. Waddington CH (1957) The strategy of the genes. Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  71. Waddington CH (1959) Biological organization: cellular and subcellular. Pergamon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  72. Waddington CH (1962) Genetics and development. Columbia University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  73. Wallis JD, Miller EK (2003) Neuronal activity in primate dorsolateral and orbital prefrontal cortex during performance of a reward preference task. Eur J Neurosci 18(7):2069–2081PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and IdeasTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations