Advertisement

Animal Cognition

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 441–449 | Cite as

Wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) distinguish between different scream types: evidence from a playback study

  • Katie Elizabeth Slocombe
  • Simon W. Townsend
  • Klaus Zuberbühler
Original Paper

Abstract

When experiencing aggression from group members, chimpanzees commonly produce screams. These agonistic screams are graded signals and vary acoustically as a function of the severity of aggression the caller is facing. We conducted a series of field playback experiments with a community of wild chimpanzees in the Budongo Forest, Uganda, to determine whether individuals could meaningfully distinguish between screams given in different agonistic contexts. We compared six subjects’ responses to screams given in response to severe and mild aggression. Subjects consistently discriminated between the two scream types. To address the possibility that the response differences were driven directly by the screams’ peripheral acoustic features, rather than any attached social meaning, we also tested the subjects’ responses to tantrum screams. These screams are given by individuals that experienced social frustration, but no physical threat, yet acoustically they are very similar to screams of victims of severe aggression. We found chimpanzees looked longer at severe victim screams than either mild victim screams or tantrum screams. Our results indicate that chimpanzees attend to the informational content of screams and are able to distinguish between different scream variants, which form part of a graded continuum.

Keywords

Vocalisations Playback experiment Chimpanzees Screams Social cognition 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of the Budongo Conservation Field Station (BCFS), particularly field assistants Monday Gideon, Afeku Alfred, Jackson Okuti, Steven Amati, Sam Adieu, Geresomu Muhamuza and James Kakura for invaluable contributions to running these experiments. We thank Zanna Clay, Tanja Kaller, Anne Marijke Schel and Marion Laporte for assistance with conducting these experiments. We thank Robert Seyfarth, Richard Byrne, Lucy Bates, Drew Rendall and Sarah Papworth for comments on the manuscript. We are grateful to UWA, UNSCT and the Presidents Office for permission to live and work in Uganda. This work complies with the research regulations, ethical guidelines, and laws of Uganda and the guidelines of the University of St Andrews. We thank the Royal Zoological Society of Scotland for providing core funding to BCFS. This research was funded by the BBSRC.

References

  1. Bergman TJ, Beehner JC, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (2003) Hierarchical classification by rank and kinship in baboons. Science 302:1234–1236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Charlton B, Reby D, McComb K (2007) Female red deer prefer the roars of larger males. Biol Lett 3(4):382–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1980) Vocal recognition in free ranging vervet monkeys. Anim Behav 28(2):362–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (2007) Baboon metaphysics: the evolution of a social mind. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM, Silk JB (1995) The responses of female baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus) to anomalous social interactions: evidence for causal reasoning? J Comp Psychol 109:134–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eggeling WJ (1947) Observations on the ecology of Budongo rain forest, Uganda. J Ecol 34:20–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fawcett K, Muhumuza G (2000) Death of a wild chimpanzee community member: possible outcome of intense sexual competition. Am J Primatol 51:243–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fichtel C, Hammerschmidt K (2003) Responses of squirrel monkeys to their experimentally modified mobbing calls. J Acoust Soc Am 113:2927–2932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fischer J (1998) Barbary macaques categorize shrill barks into two call types. Anim Behav 55:799–807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fischer J (2004) Emergence of individual recognition in young macaques. Anim Behav 67:655–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fugate JMB, Gouzoules H, Nygaard LC (2008) Recognition of rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) noisy screams: evidence from conspecifics and human listeners. Am J Primatol 70:594–604PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gouzoules S, Gouzoules H, Marler P (1984) Rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) screams: representational signalling in the recruitment of agonistic aid. Anim Behav 32:182–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gouzoules H, Gouzoules S, Marler P (1986) Vocal communication: a vehicle for the study of social relationships. In: Rawlings RG, Kessler MJ (eds) The Cayo Santiago macaques. SUNY Press, Albany, pp 111–129Google Scholar
  14. Herbinger I (2004) Inter-group aggression in wild West African chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus): mechanisms and functions. PhD thesis, University of Leipzig, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  15. Kojima S, Izumi A, Ceugniet M (2003) Identification of vocalisers by pant hoots, pant grunts and screams in a chimpanzee. Primates 44:225–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liberman AM, Harris KS, Hoffman HS, Griffith BC (1957) The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. J Exp Psychol 54:358–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mundry R, Fischer J (1998) Use of statistical programs for nonparametric tests of small samples often leads to incorrect p values: examples from animal behaviour. Anim Behav 56:256–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Owren MJ, Rendall D (1997) An affect-conditioning model of nonhuman primate vocal signalling. In: Owings DH et al (eds) Perspectives in ethology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 299–346Google Scholar
  19. Owren MJ, Rendall D (2003) Salience of caller identity in rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) coos and screams: perceptual experiments with humans (Homo sapiens) listeners. J Comp Psychol 117:380–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pfefferle D, Heistermann M, Hodges K, Fischer J (2008) Male Barbary macaques eavesdrop on mating outcome: a playback study. Anim Behav 75:1885–1891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rendall D, Rodman PS, Emond RE (1996) Vocal recognition of individuals and kin in free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Anim Behav 51:1007–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reynolds V (2005) The chimpanzees of Budongo Forest: ecology, behaviour and conservation. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2003) Signalers and receivers in animal communication. Annu Rev Psychol 54:145–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL, Marler P (1980) Vervet monkey alarm calls: semantic communication in a free-ranging primate. Anim Behav 28(4):1070–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Silk JB, Brosnan SF, Vonk J, Henrich J, Povinelli DJ, Richardson AS, Lambeth SP, Mascaro J, Schapiro SJ (2005) Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members. Nature 437(7063):1357–1359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Slocombe KE, Zuberbühler K (2005a) Functionally referential communication in a chimpanzee. Curr Biol 15(19):1779–1784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Slocombe KE, Zuberbühler K (2005b) Agonistic screams in wild chimpanzees vary as a function of social role. J Comp Psychol 119(1):67–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Slocombe KE, Zuberbühler K (2007) Chimpanzees modify recruitment screams as a function of audience composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:17228–17233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tomasello M (2008) Origins of human communication. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Townsend SW, Slocombe KE, Emery-Thompson M, Zuberbühler K (2007) Female-led infanticide in wild chimpanzees. Curr Biol 17(10):355–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilson ML, Hauser MD, Wrangham RW (2001) Does participation in intergroup conflict depend on numerical assessment, range location, or rank for wild chimpanzees? Anim Behav 61(6):1203–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wittig RM, Crockford C, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2007a) Vocal alliances in chacma baboons, Papio hamadryas ursinus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:899–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wittig RM, Crockford C, Wikberg E, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2007b) Kin-mediated reconciliation substitutes for direct reconciliation in female baboons. Proc R Soc B 274:1109–1115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zuberbühler K (2003) Referential signaling in non-human primates: cognitive precursors and limitations for the evolution of language. Adv Study Behav 33:265–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katie Elizabeth Slocombe
    • 1
    • 3
  • Simon W. Townsend
    • 2
    • 3
  • Klaus Zuberbühler
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of YorkYorkUK
  2. 2.School of PsychologyUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK
  3. 3.Budongo Conservation Field StationMasindiUganda

Personalised recommendations