Animal Cognition

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 435–439 | Cite as

Prairie dog alarm calls encode labels about predator colors

  • C. N. SlobodchikoffEmail author
  • Andrea Paseka
  • Jennifer L. Verdolin
Original Paper


Some animals have the cognitive capacity to differentiate between different species of predators and generate different alarm calls in response. However, the presence of any addition information that might be encoded into alarm calls has been largely unexplored. In the present study, three similar-sized human females walked through a Gunnison’s prairie dog (Cynomys gunnisoni) colony wearing each of three different-colored shirts: blue, green, and yellow. We recorded the alarm calls and used discriminant function analysis to assess whether the calls for the different-colored shirts were significantly different. The results showed that the alarm calls for the blue and the yellow shirts were significantly different, but the green shirt calls were not significantly different from the calls for the yellow shirt. The colors that were detected, with corresponding encoding into alarm calls, reflect the visual perceptual abilities of the prairie dogs. This study suggests that prairie dogs are able to incorporate labels about the individual characteristics of predators into their alarm calls, and that the complexity of information contained in animal alarm calls may be greater than has been previously believed.


Gunnison’s prairie dogs Referential communication Alarm calls 


  1. Beynon P, Rasa OAE (1989) Do dwarf mongooses have a language? warning vocalizations transmit complex information. S Afr Tydsk Weten 85:447Google Scholar
  2. Blumstein DT, Armitage KB (1997) Alarm calling in yellow-bellied marmots: I. The meaning of situationally variable alarm calls. Anim Behav 53:143–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Evans CS (1997) Referential signals. In: Owings DH, Beecher MD, Thompson NS (eds) Perspectives in Ethology, vol 12. Plenum, New York, pp 99–143Google Scholar
  4. Evans CS, Evans L (1999) Chicken calls are functionally referential. Anim Behav 58:307–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Evans CS, Evans L, Marler P (1993) On the meaning of alarm calls: functional reference in an avian vocal system. Anim Behav 46:23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frederiksen JK, Slobodchikoff CN (2007) Referential specificity in the alarm calls of the black-tailed prairie dog. Ethol Ecol Evol 19:87–99Google Scholar
  7. Greene E, Meagher T (1998) Red squirrels, Tamiasciurus hudsonicus, produce predator-class specific alarm calls. Anim Behav 55:511–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gyger M, Marler P, Pickert R (1987) Semantics of an avian alarm call system: the male domestic fowl, Gallus domesticus. Behaviour 102:15–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacobs GH, Pulliam KA (1973) Vision in the prairie dog: spectral sensitivity and color vision. J Comp Physiol Psych 84:240–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kirchhof J, Hammerschmidt K (2006) Functionally referential alarm calls in tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis and Saguinus mystax): evidence from playback experiments. Ethology 112:346–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kiriazis J, Slobodchikoff CN (2006) Perceptual specificity in the alarm calls of Gunnison’s prairie dogs. Behav Processes 73:29–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leydet F (1977) The coyote: defiant songdog of the west. Chronicle Books, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  13. Manser MB (2001) The acoustic structure of suricates’ alarm calls varies with predator type and the level of response urgency. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2315–2324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Manser MB, Bell MB, Fletcher LB (2001) The information that receivers extract from alarm calls in suricates. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2185–2491Google Scholar
  15. Owings DH, Hennessy DF (1984) The importance of variation in sciurid visual and vocal communication. In: Murie JO, Michener GR (eds) The biology of ground dwelling squirrels. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp 171–200Google Scholar
  16. Placer J, Slobodchikoff CN (2000) A fuzzy-neural system for identification of species-specific alarm calls of Gunnison’s prairie dogs. Behav Processes 52:1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Placer J, Slobodchikoff CN (2001) Developing new metrics for the investigation of animal vocalizations. Intell Autom Soft Comput 7:1–11Google Scholar
  18. Placer J, Slobodchikoff CN (2004) A method for identifying sounds used in the classification of alarm calls. Behavioural Processes 67:87–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Placer J, Slobodchikoff CN, Burns J, Placer J, Middleton R (2006) Using self-organizing maps to recognize acoustic units associated with information content in anaimal vocalizations. J Acoust Soc Am 119:3140–3146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL, Marler P (1980) Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence for predator classification and semantic communication. Science 210:801–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Slobodchikoff CN (2002) Cognition and communication in prairie dogs. In: Bekoff M, Allen C, Burgardt GM (eds) The cognitive animal. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 257–264Google Scholar
  22. Slobodchikoff CN, Placer J (2006) Acoustic structures in the alarm calls of Gunnison’s prairie dogs. J Acoust Soc Am 119:3153–3260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Slobodchikoff CN, Kiriazis J, Fischer C, Creef E (1991) Semantic information distinguishing individual predators in the alarm calls of Gunnison’s prairie dogs. Anim Behav 42:712–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Templeton CN, Greene E, Davis K (2005) Allometry of alarm calls: black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size. Science 308:1934–1937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Verdolin J, Slobodchikoff CN (2002) Vigilance and predation risk in Gunnison’s prairie dogs. Can J Zool 80:1197–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Warkentin KJ, Keeley ATH, Hare JF (2001) Repetitive calls of juvenile Richardson’s ground squirrels (Spermophilus richardsonii) communicate response urgency. Can J Zool 79:569–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zuberbühler K (2000) Referential labelling in Diana monkeys. Anim Behav 59:917–927PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zuberbühler K (2001) Predator-specific alarm calls in Campbell’s monkeys, Cercopithecus campbelli. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:414–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. N. Slobodchikoff
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andrea Paseka
    • 2
  • Jennifer L. Verdolin
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of NebraskaLincolnUSA
  3. 3.Department of Ecology and EvolutionStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations