Animal Cognition

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 181–192

Social attention in keas, dogs, and human children

  • Friederike Range
  • Lisa Horn
  • Thomas Bugnyar
  • Gyula K. Gajdon
  • Ludwig Huber
Original Paper

Abstract

Understanding animals’ abilities to cooperate with and learn from each other has been an active field of research in recent years. One important basis for all types of social interactions is the disposition of animals to pay attention to each other—a factor often neglected in discussions and experiments. Since attention differs between species as well as between individuals, it is likely to influence the amount and type of information different species and/or observers may extract from conspecifics in any given situation. Here, we carried out a standardized comparative study on attention towards a model demonstrating food-related behavior in keas, dogs and children. In a series of experimental sessions, individuals watched different conspecific models while searching, manipulating and feeding. Visual access to the demonstration was provided by two observation holes, which allowed us to determine exactly how often and for how long observers watched the model. We found profound differences in the factors that influence attention within as well as between the tested species. This study suggests that attention should be incorporated as an important variable when testing species in social situations.

Keywords

Attention Species comparison Children Keas Dogs Social learning experiments Observing conspecifics 

References

  1. Anderson DR, Levin SR (1976) Young children’s attention to “Sesame Street”. Child Dev 47:806–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Byrne RW, Russon AE (1998) Learning by imitation: a hierarchical approach. Behav Brain Sci 21:667–721PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Choleris E, Guo C, Liu HF, Mainardi M, Valsecchi P (1997) The effect of model age and number on duration of socially-induced food preferences in house mouse (Mus domesticus). Behav Processes 41:69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Choleris E, Kavaliers M (1999) Social learning in animals: sex differences and neurobiological analysis. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 64:767–776PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen LB (1972) Attention-getting and attention-holding processes of infant visual preferences. Child Dev 43:869–875PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Day RL, Coe RL, Kendal JR, Laland KN (2003) Neophilia, innovation and social learning: a study of intergeneric differences in callitrichid monkeys. Anim Behav 65:559–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diamond A (1991) Neuropsychological insights in into the meaning of object concept development. In: Carey S, Gelman R (eds) The epigenesis of mind: essays on biology and cognition. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  8. Diamond J, Bond AB (1991) Social behavior and the ontogeny of foraging in the kea (Nestor notabilis). Ethology 88:128–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diamond J, Bond AB (1999) Kea, bird of paradox: the evolution and behavior of a New Zealand parrot. University of California Press, BerkleyGoogle Scholar
  10. Fragaszy D, Visalberghi E (1990) Social processes affecting the appearance of innovative behaviours in capuchin monkeys. Folia Primatol 54:155–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fragaszy D, Visalberghi E (2004) Socially biased learning in monkeys. Learn Behav 32:24–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gajdon GK, Stauffacher M (2001) Social influence on early foraging of domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). In: Oester H, Wyss C (eds) 6th European symposium on poultry welfare. Druckerei Arm, Bern, pp 254–260Google Scholar
  13. Ginsburg BE (1991) Origins and dynamics of social organization in primates and wolves: cooperation, aggression and hierarchy. In: Somit A, Wildenmann R (eds) Hierarchy and democracy. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden, pp 45–62Google Scholar
  14. Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1634–1636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Howes C (1988) Peer interaction of young children. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 53 (1, serial no. 217)Google Scholar
  16. Huber L, Rechberger S, Taborsky M (2001) Social learning affects object exploration and manipulation in keas, Nestor notabilis. Anim Behav 62:945–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kubinyi E, Topal J, Miklosi A, Csanyi V (2003) Dogs (Canis familiaris) learn from their owners via observation in a manipulation task. J Comp Psychol 117:156–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McConnell PB, Baylis JR (1985) Interspecific communication in cooperative herding—acoustic and visual signals from human shepherds and herding dogs. Z F Tierpsych J Comp Ethol 67:302–328Google Scholar
  19. Menzel EW (1973) Leadership and communication in young chimpanzees. In: Menzel EW (ed) Precultural primate behaviour. Karger, Basel, pp 192–225Google Scholar
  20. Menzel EW (1974) A group of young chimpanzees in a one acre-field. In: Schrier AM, Stollnitz F (eds) Behaviour of nonhuman primates. Academic Press, New York, pp 83–153Google Scholar
  21. Miklosi A, Kubinyi E, Topal J, Gacsi M, Zs Viranyi, Csanyi V (2003) A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans but dogs do. Curr Biol 13:763–767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miklosi A, Polgardi R, Topal J, Csanyi V (2000) Intentional behaviour in dog-human communication: an experimental analysis of “showing” behaviour in the dog. Anim Cogn 3:159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miklosi A, Soproni K (2006) A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Anim Cogn 9:81–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mineka S, Cook M (1988) Social learning and acquisition of snake fear responses in monkeys. In: Zentall TR, Galef BG Jr (eds) Social learning: psychological and biological perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 51–73Google Scholar
  25. Moscovice LR, Snowdon CT (2006) The role of social context and individual experience in novel task acquisition in cottontop tamarins, Saguinus oedipus. Anim Behav 71:933–943PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nicol CJ, Pope SJ (1999) The effects of model social status and prior foraging success on social learning in laying hens. Anim Behav 57:163–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nishida T (1987) Local traditions and cultural transmission. In: Smuts BB, Cheney D, Seyfarth R, Wrangham R, Struhsaker T (eds) Primate societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 462–474Google Scholar
  28. Pongracz P, Miklosi A, Kubinyi E, Gurobi K, Topal J, Csanyi V (2001) Social learning in dogs: the effect of a human model on the performance of dogs in a detour task. Anim Behav 62:1109–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pongracz P, Miklosi A, Timar-Geng K, Csanyi V (2004) Verbal attention getting as a key factor in social learning between dog (Canis familiaris) and human. J Comp Psychol 118:375–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Porges SW, Smith KM (1980) Defining hyperactivity: psychophysiological behavioral strategies. In: Whalen CK, Henker B (eds) Hyperactive children: the social ecology of identification and treatment. Academic Press, New York, pp 75–104Google Scholar
  31. Range F, Huber L (2007) Attention of common marmosets–implications for social learning experiments. Anim Behav 73:1033–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Range F, Viranyi Zs, Huber L (2007) Selective imitation in domestic dogs. Curr Biol 17:868–872PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rubin KH, Bukowski W, Parker JG (1997) Peer interactions, relationships and groups. In: Damon W, Eisenberg N (eds) Handbook of child psychology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruff HA, Lawson KR (1990) Development of sustained, focused attention in young children during free play. Dev Psychol 26:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ruff HA, Rothbart MK (1996) Attention in early development. Themes and variations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Scheid C, Range F, Bugnyar T (2007) When what and whom to watch? quantifying attention in ravens and jackdaws. J Comp Psychol 121:380–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tebbich S, Taborsky M, Winkler H (1996) Social manipulation causes cooperation in keas. Anim Behav 52:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tomasello M (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  39. Tomasello M, Carpenter M, Call J, Behne T, Moll H (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behav Brain Sci 28:691–735Google Scholar
  40. Valsecchi P, Bosellini I, Mainardi D, Mainardi M (1993) Further analysis of a case of social-learning in the house mouse (Mus-Domesticus). Ethol Ecol Evol 5:121–125Google Scholar
  41. Zs Viranyi, Topal J, Miklosi A, Csanyi V (2006) A nonverbal test of knowledge attribution: a comparative study on dogs and children. Anim Cogn 9:13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Visalberghi E, Addessi E (2000a) Response to changes in food palatability in tufted capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Anim Behav 59:231–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Visalberghi E, Addessi E (2000b) Seeing group members eating a familiar food enhances the acceptance of novel foods in capuchin monkeys. Anim Behav 60:69–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Visalberghi E, Sabbatini G, Stammati M, Addessi E (2003) Preferences towards novel foods in Cebus apella: the role of nutrients and social influences. Physiol Behav 80:341–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Warner RR (1988) Traditionality of mating preferences in a coral reef fish. Nature 335:719–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Washburn DA, Baker LA (2006) Attention as it is manifested across species. In: Wasserman EA, Zentall TR (eds) Comparative cognition. Experimental explorations of animal intelligence. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 127–142Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Friederike Range
    • 1
  • Lisa Horn
    • 1
  • Thomas Bugnyar
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gyula K. Gajdon
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ludwig Huber
    • 1
  1. 1.Department für Neurobiologie und KognitionsforschungUniversität WienViennaAustria
  2. 2.School of PsychologyUniversity of St. AndrewsSt. AndrewsAustria
  3. 3.Konrad-Lorenz-Institute for Comparative EthologyAustrian Academy of SciencesViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations