Mule cognition: a case of hybrid vigour?
- 595 Downloads
This study compares the behaviour of the mule (Equus asinus × Equus caballus) with that of its parent species to assess the effects of hybridization on cognition. Six mules, six ponies (E. caballus) and six donkeys (E. asinus) were given a two choice visual discrimination learning task. Each session consisted of 12 trials and pass level was reached when subjects chose the correct stimulus for at least 9 out of the 12 trials in three consecutive sessions. A record was made of how many pairs each subject learnt over 25 sessions. The mules’ performance was significantly better than that of either of the parent species (Kruskal-Wallis: Hx = 8.11, P = 0.017). They were also the only group to learn enough pairs to be able to show a successive reduction in the number of sessions required to reach criterion level. This study provides the first empirical evidence that the improved characteristics of mules may be extended from physical attributes to cognitive function.
KeywordsCognition Discrimination learning Heterosis Horse Mule
This experiment complies with the United Kingdom Home Office regulations concerning animal research and welfare as well as the University of Exeter regulations on the use of animals. We are grateful to the members of staff at The Donkey Sanctuary’s Town Barton farm for their support and willingness to facilitate this project. For comments on the manuscript we thank Karen McComb.
- Field A (2005) Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd edn. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Fiske JC, Potter GD (1979) Discrimination reversal learning in yearling horses. J Anim Sci 49:583–588Google Scholar
- Krueger K, Heinze J (2008) Horse sense: social status of horses (Equus caballus) affects their likelihood of copying other horses’ behaviour. Anim Cogn. doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0133-0
- Macphail EM (1982) Brain and intelligence in vertebrates. Clarenden Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Maros K, Gácsi M, Miklósi Á (2008) Comprehension of human pointing gestures in horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0136-5
- McFarland D (1999) Animal behaviour. Pearson Education, Harlow, EssexGoogle Scholar
- Moritz RFA (1988) A reevaluation of the two-locus model for hygenic behaviour in honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). J Hered 79:257–262Google Scholar
- Owen EH, Logue SF, Rasmussen DL, Wehner JM (1997) Assessment of learning by the Morris water task and fear conditioning in inbred mouse strains and F-1 hybrids: implications of genetic background for single gene mutations and quantitative trait loci analyses. Neuroscience 80:1087–1099PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Passingham RE (1981) Primate specializations in brain and intelligence. Symp Zool Soc Lond 46:361–388Google Scholar
- Pearce JM (1997) Animal learning and cognition, 2nd edn. Psychology Press, Hove, UKGoogle Scholar
- Shettleworth SJ (1998) Cognition evolution, and behaviour. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Shull GH (1908) The composition of a field of maize. American Breeder’s Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Travis L (1990) The mule. J. A. Allen & Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Voith VL (1975) Pattern discrimination, learning set formation, memory retention, spatial and visual reversal learning in the horse. MSc thesis, Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Waring G (2003) Horse Behaviour, 2nd edn. Noyes Publishing/William Andrew Publishing, Norwich, NYGoogle Scholar
- Warren JM (1965) Primate learning in comparative perspective. In: Shrier AM, Harlow HF, Stollnittz F (eds) Behaviour of nonhuman primates. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar