Animal Cognition

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 495–503 | Cite as

Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish

  • Christian AgrilloEmail author
  • Marco Dadda
  • Giovanna Serena
  • Angelo Bisazza
Original Paper


The spontaneous tendency to join the largest social group was used to investigate quantity discrimination in fish. Fish discriminated between shoals that differed by one element when the paired numbers were 1vs2, 2vs3 and 3vs4, but not when 4vs5 or larger. Using large numerosities (>4), the ability to discriminate between two numbers improved as the numerical distance between them increased and a significant discrimination was found only with ratios of 1:2 or smaller (4vs8, 8vs16 and 4vs10). Experiments to control for non-numerical variables evidenced the role played by the total area of stimuli with both large and small numerosities; the total quantity of movement of the fish within a shoal appeared also important but only when large numerosities were involved. Even though the pattern of discrimination exhibited by female mosquitofish is not fully consistent with any of the existing models of quantity representation, our results seem to suggest two distinct mechanisms in fish, one used to compare small numbers of objects and one used when larger numerosities are involved.


Fish cognition Quantity discrimination Continuous variable Number 



The authors would like to thank Brian Butterworth, Elizabeth Spelke, Marco Zorzi for useful comments, Jonathan Daisley and Peter Kramer for their suggestions and Maria Anna Posa for her help conducting the experiments. This study was supported by research grants of the University of Padova to AB. The reported experiments comply with all laws of the country (Italy) in which they were performed.


  1. Agrillo C, Dadda M (2007) Discrimination of the larger shoal in the poeciliid fish Girardinus falcatus. Ethol Ecol Evol 19(2):145–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrillo C, Dadda M, Bisazza A (2007) Quantity discrimination in female mosquitofish. Anim Cogn 10:63–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber I, Downey LC, Braithwaite VA (1998) Parasitism, oddity and the mechanism of shoal choice. J Fish Biol 53:1365–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barth H, Kanwisher N, Spelke E (2003) Construction of large number representations in adults. Cognition 86:201–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bisazza A, Marin G (1995) Sexual selection and sexual size dimorphism in the eastern mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Ethol Ecol Evol 7:169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cantlon JF, Brannon EM (2006) The effect of heterogeneity on numerical ordering in rhesus monkeys. Infancy 9(2):173–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clearfield MW, Mix KS (1999) Number versus contour length in infants’ discrimination of small visual sets. Psychol Sci 10:408–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cordes S, Gelman R, Gallistel CR, Whalen J (2001) Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both small and large numbers. Psychon Bull Rev 8:698–707PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dehaene S, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Cohen L (1998) Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain. Trends Neurosci 21:355–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Durgin FH (1995) Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity and distribution of texture. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:149–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feigenson L, Carey S (2005) On the limits of infants’ quantification of small object arrays. Cognition 97:295–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feigenson L, Carey S, Hauser MD (2002a) The representations underlying infants’ choice of more: object files vs. analog magnitudes. Psychol Sci 13:150–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feigenson L, Carey S, Spelke E (2002b) Infants’ discrimination of number vs. continuous extent. Cognit Psychol 44:33–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feigenson L, Dehaene S, Spelke E (2004) Core systems of number. Trends Cogn Sci 7:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gallistel CR, Gelman R (2000) Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers. Trends Cogn Sci 4:59–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gentner TQ (2004) Neural systems for individual song recognition in adult birds. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1016(1):282–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hager MC, Helfman GS (1991) Safety in numbers: shoal size choice by minnows under predatory threat. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:271–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theor Biol 31:295–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hauser MD, Spelke ES (2004) Evolutionary and developmental foundations of human knowledge: a case study of mathematics. In: Gazzaniga M (ed) The cognitive neurosciences, vol 3. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Hauser MD, Carey S, Hauser LB (2000) Spontaneous number representation in semi-free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:829–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hauser MD, Tsao F, Garcia P, Spelke ES (2003) Evolutionary foundations of number: spontaneous representations of numerical magnitudes by cotton-top tamarins. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1441–1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haxby J (2002) Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication. Biol Psychiatry 51(1):59–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoare DJ, Couzin ID, Godin JG, Krause J (2004) Context-dependent group size choice in fish. Anim Behav 67:155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jordan KE, Brannon EM (2006) Weber’s Law influences numerical representations in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Anim Cogn 9(3):159–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krause J, Godin JGJ (1995) Predator preferences for attacking particular prey group sizes: consequences for predator hunting success and predation risk. Anim Behav 50:465–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewis K, Jaffe S, Brannon EM (2005) Analog number representations in mongoose lemurs (Eulemur mongoz): evidence from a search task. Anim Cogn 8(4):247–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lipton JS, Spelke ES (2003) Origins of number sense: large number discrimination in human infants. Psychol Sci 14:396–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meck WH, Church RM (1983) A mode control model of counting and timing processes. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 9:320–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peichel CL (2004) Social behavior: how do fish find their shoal mate? Curr Biol 14(13):R503–R504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pepperberg I (2006) Grey parrot numerical competence: a review. Anim Cogn 9:377–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pritchard VL, Lawrence J, Butlin RK, Krause J (2001) Shoal size in zebrafish, Danio rerio: the influence of shoal size and activity. Anim Behav 62:1085–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pylyshyn ZW, Storm RW (1988) Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spat Vis 3(3):179–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reynolds WW, Casterlin ME (1979) Effect of temperature on locomotor activity in the goldfish (Carassius auratus) and the bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus): presence of an ‘activity well’ in the region of the final preferendum. Hydrobiologia 65(1):3–5Google Scholar
  34. Rohlf FJ (2004) TPSDIG, Version 1.40. Dept. of Ecology and Evolution, State Univ. of New York, Stony BrookGoogle Scholar
  35. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Stevens JR, Wood JN, Hauser MD (2007) When quantity trumps number: discrimination experiments in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) and common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Anim Cogn 10:429–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Trick LM, Pylyshyn ZW (1994) Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychol Rev 101:80–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Uller C, Carey S, Huntley-Fenner G, Klatt L (1999) What representations might underlie infant numerical knowledge. Cogn Dev 14:1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Uller C, Jaeger R, Guidry G, Martin C (2003) Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of number in a species of basal vertebrate. Anim Cogn 6:105–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Vos PG, Van Oeffelen MP, Tibosch HJ, Allik J (1988) Area-numerosity interactions. Psychol Res 50:148–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whalen J, Gallistel CR, Gelman R (1999) Nonverbal counting in humans: the psychophysics of number representation. Psychol Sci 10:130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wood JN, Spelke ES (2005) Infants’ enumeration of actions: numerical discrimination and its signature limits. Dev Sci 8(2):173–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Xu F (2003) Numerosity discrimination in infants: evidence for two systems of representations. Cognition 89(1):B15–B25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Xu F, Arriaga RI (2007) Number discrimination in 10-month-old infants. Br J Dev Psychol 25(1):103–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Xu F, Spelke ES (2000) Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition 74:B1–B11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Agrillo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marco Dadda
    • 1
  • Giovanna Serena
    • 1
  • Angelo Bisazza
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General PsychologyUniversity of PadovaPaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations